“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label JCIO complaint. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JCIO complaint. Show all posts

Justice for Sale: £1.1 Million in Disability Damages from the Crown


⟡ The Court That Required My Voice — and Ignored My Lungs ⟡

Filed: 1 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/JCIO/2025-DISABILITY-BREACH
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-01_SWANK_JCIO_EvidenceBundle_CrownCourt_DisabilityViolation_TrialInjustice_£1.1MClaim.pdf

I. Justice for Sale: £1.1 Million in Disability Damages from the Crown

This submission to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) documents:

  • A Crown Court’s refusal to accommodate a written-only disability adjustment

  • Procedural disregard for respiratory collapse risk and trauma diagnoses

  • Institutional coercion masquerading as “trial preparation”

  • Psychological injury and litigation obstruction caused by enforced verbal exposure

The court didn’t need my voice.
It demanded it anyway — and then called that justice.

II. No Adjustment. No Participation. No Justice.

The evidence includes:

  • Chronology of denied accommodations

  • Emails confirming prior clinical documentation

  • Failed judicial oversight

  • Legal exclusion triggered not by law, but by ablist expectation

This wasn’t access to justice.
It was gatekeeping through phonics — in violation of statute, ethics, and human dignity.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because the courtroom is not exempt from law.
Because written-only adjustments are not “preferences” — they are medically grounded legal instruments.
Because when a court demands speech from a disabled claimant, it is no longer a tribunal — it is an engine of exclusion in robes.

Let the record show:

  • The risk was declared

  • The adjustment was dismissed

  • The exclusion was deliberate

  • And SWANK — filed it for £1.1 million

This isn’t contempt of court.
It’s contempt by court — and we returned it in evidence format.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not permit judicial architecture to disguise procedural abuse.
We do not accept that justice must be spoken aloud.
We do not allow the judiciary to reject medical truth without valuation.

Let the record show:

The courtroom wasn’t safe.
The judge ignored the file.
The law was breached.
And SWANK — filed every syllable in PDF.

This isn’t reformable.
It’s an archive of trial injustice, priced at £1.1 million, sealed in breath and refusal.




No comments:

Documented Obsessions