⟡ SWANK Equality Archive: State Retaliation Index ⟡
“They Ignored the Adjustment. Then They Ignored the Law.”
Filed: 1 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/EHRC/DISABILITY-RETALIATION
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-01_SWANK_EHRC_Complaint_DisabilityRetaliation_IntersectionalDiscrimination.pdf
I. This Was Not a Plea. It Was an Indictment.
On 1 May 2025, SWANK London Ltd. issued a formal complaint to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) — naming every public body, every failure, and every retaliatory act waged against a disabled parent who dared to file back.
This was not sent in hope.
It was sent as evidence under jurisdiction.
The submission cites:
Disability discrimination: refusal to honour a written-only adjustment
Safeguarding misuse: escalation without lawful threshold
Institutional indifference: GPs, councils, regulators shrugging in chorus
Intersectional bias: as a disabled woman, parent, and survivor of state intrusion
II. What the Complaint Documents
A family medically exempt from verbal communication
Repeated safeguarding referrals filed:
Without cause
After legal filings
In breach of disability protections
Named actors from:
Westminster City Council
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC)
Pembridge Surgery
St Thomas’ Hospital
And a public archive — SWANK London Ltd. — that has already documented every file, date, and name.
This wasn’t a summary.
It was a structured timeline of systemic harm.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because Equality Law is not a suggestion.
And no public body is immune from its obligations — least of all when the discrimination is deliberate, coordinated, and retaliatory.
We filed this because:
Written-only was ignored.
Illness was framed as instability.
Complaint became cause for escalation.
And institutional silence functioned as collusion.
This isn’t about awareness.
It’s about accountability.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not wait to be heard.
We submit.
We file.
And we publish.
We do not ask for equality.
We document its violation.
Let the record show:
The law was cited.
The actors were named.
The evidence was filed.
And now — it is public.
This wasn’t a complaint.
It was a legal witness statement, served with formatting.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.