⟡ SWANK Resubmission Record ⟡
“The Complaint They Ignored. The Resubmission They Can’t.”
Filed: 2 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/GSTT/RESUBMIT/2025-06-02
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-02_SWANK_Resubmission_GSTT_DisabilityNegligence_NoResponse_EqualityAct.pdf
I. When Silence Is a Strategy, Filing Is a Weapon
This is not a new complaint.
It is the same one they ignored — returned, escalated, and now recorded.
On 2 June 2025, SWANK London Ltd. formally resubmitted a complaint to Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust concerning:
Disability discrimination
Clinical negligence
Safeguarding abuse
Procedural delay
Breach of the Equality Act 2010
They had 8 weeks to respond.
They chose not to.
So we filed it again — publicly, and with improved tone.
II. What They Tried to Avoid
The original complaint, submitted in March 2025, detailed:
Eosinophilic asthma neglected
Written-only communication breached
NHS staff retaliation disguised as “concern”
Psychological and physiological harm
No resolution. No final letter. No closure.
PHSO refused to investigate without a final reply.
GSTT simply never sent one.
So we gave them another opportunity — with a timestamp.
They used silence as defence.
We used resubmission as evidence.
III. Why This Is Now a Public Filing
Because delay is not neutral.
Because the Equality Act does not allow NHS bodies to ignore disabled patients.
Because your “final response” cannot be: no response.
This document now functions as:
A trigger for PHSO escalation
A formal record of institutional avoidance
A statement of intent from SWANK: we don’t go away — we resubmit louder
IV. SWANK’s Position
They didn’t reject the complaint.
They erased it.
And in doing so, proved the very allegation at its core: that disability complaint invites punishment — or disappearance.
We do not wait politely.
We file permanently.
This document is now part of the public archive.
Let the record show:
They were told once.
They were told again.
And now the silence speaks louder than anything they could write.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.