⟡ They Ignored Her Oxygen Levels. So I Escalated to the Police. ⟡
“Your safeguarding concern was noted. So was your failure to treat her.”
Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS-MPS/EMAILS-15
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_EmailEscalation_NHSStMarys_HonorMistreatment_PoliceReportIntent.pdf
Escalation email following emergency mistreatment of Heir at St Mary’s Hospital A&E. Forwarded to safeguarding teams with notice of police report and refusal to remain silent.
I. What Happened
On 21 November 2024, shortly after her daughter Heir was dismissed from emergency care despite respiratory distress, the parent:
Forwarded the complaint to Westminster Children’s Services
Included medical context, oxygen data, and details of hostile treatment
Noted that the hospital had escalated a safeguarding concern against her — instead of addressing their own clinical failure
Stated plainly that she would report the incident to police
Reminded all recipients that documented medical neglect was not excused by filing against the parent
The email stood as both evidence and warning: the system may escalate, but so will the archive.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
That Heir’s mistreatment at A&E was witnessed, recorded, and reported immediately
That NHS staff attempted to reframe the incident by filing against the parent
That the parent proactively responded with a clear paper trail, not silence
That Westminster Children’s Services was informed in real-time and could not later claim ignorance
That the escalation to police was not for show — it was for legal accountability
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because when your daughter needs help breathing and the hospital staff refuse to act —
and then file a concern about you —
that’s not safeguarding.
That’s cover-up protocol.
Because when you respond with oxygen readings, a timeline, and legal escalation —
you are not “uncooperative.”
You are documenting the scene.
And because when they send in safeguarding,
you send them the truth —
in PDF format.
IV. Violations
NHS Constitution – Duty of Care
Breach of clinical responsibility in emergency paediatric careHuman Rights Act 1998 – Article 3 and 8
Degrading treatment and interference in family lifeChildren Act 1989 / 2004
Endangerment of a child by systemic inactionPolice and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE)
Valid grounds for police report on clinical misconductEquality Act 2010 – Section 27
Retaliatory safeguarding action following assertion of disability rights
V. SWANK’s Position
You didn’t treat her.
You dismissed her.
And then you filed against me.
So now I’ve filed back.
And this time, the police aren’t the only ones who’ll see it.
This wasn’t care.
It was cowardice in uniform.
We didn’t need a report.
We needed oxygen.
Now you’re the ones under review.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.