⟡ Postal, Please: A SAR, but Make It Tangible ⟡
“I therefore require the SAR response to be sent in physical printed format.”
Filed: 2 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/RBKC/SAR-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-02_SWANK_SAR_RBKC_PostalDeliveryRequest.pdf
A formal request to the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea for hard-copy delivery of a Subject Access Request, citing disability rights and procedural accessibility.
I. What Happened
On 2 June 2025, Polly Chromatic, Director of SWANK London Ltd., wrote to RBKC’s Data Protection Teamregarding SAR Ref: 15106629. The request was simple: comply with UK GDPR Article 15 and deliver the SAR in physical form by post.
Why? Because encrypted portals and restricted digital formats violate her medically mandated written-only policy.
No fuss. No fight. Just typography that files before they can forget.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
Assertion of GDPR-compliant access under documented disability
Clear rejection of digital-only coercion in SAR delivery
A preemptive record of accessibility expectation
RBKC now fully on notice — and fully in the archive
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because institutions love to pretend they didn’t know.
This document removes the luxury of forgetting.
Before they deny the accommodation, before they send an inaccessible email, before they claim “we didn’t realise” — this letter sits waiting. With the date. With the law. With the address.
This isn’t drama.
It’s procedural choreography.
And it’s filed.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept SAR responses hidden behind login walls.
We do not accept exclusion-by-format.
We do not accept "access" that requires a portal and a prayer.
We accept hard copy.
We accept law.
And we accept receipts.
This one’s already printed.
Theirs better be.⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.