“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label systemic trauma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label systemic trauma. Show all posts

Twelve Legal Questions. Zero Legal Answers.

 ⚖️ SWANK Dispatch: When a Lawyer Has to Ask Why Your Children Were Touched

πŸ—“️ 25 August 2020

Filed Under: legal intervention, forced medical exams, investigation without cause, rights breach, family life violation, child protection misconduct, lack of disclosure, systemic harassment, trauma documentation


“Was there a report of abuse? If so, where is it?
If not — then what gave you the right to examine my sons’ genitals?”

— A Mother, Represented and Still Waiting for Answers


This letter from attorney Lara Maroof of James Law Chambers to Ashley Adams, Deputy Director of Social Development, formalises the case that Polly Chromatic has been trying to make for over three years:
That no lawful cause has been given for the intrusion, medical violations, and trauma inflicted upon her and her children.


🧾 I. What This Letter Demands

Twelve direct legal questions, including:

  1. Was any report of suspected abuse ever made in 2017 or 2019?

  2. Was any assessment carried out before police and social worker visits?

  3. On what grounds were her three sons subjected to genital examinations?

  4. Why was no interview conducted with Polly prior to these exams?

  5. Why were the children not spoken to before being touched?

  6. What legal section was used to justify action — or inaction — under the Children (Care and Protection) Ordinance?

  7. What lawful grounds existed for the 26 March 2020 home intrusion during national lockdown?

  8. Is there an active investigation or not?

These are basic statutory questions.
Yet none had ever been answered.
Even after three years.
Even after a lawyer asked in writing.


⚠️ II. What This Reveals

  • There is no record of a proper cause for any investigation

  • The department violated both medical ethics and legal procedure

  • No closure was given. No actions were explained.

  • The result has been chronic, legally sanctioned distress for Noelle and her children

“After three years, it is reasonable to expect your Department would have been able to form a very clear opinion…”
Instead — they formed no opinionno case, and no lawful conclusion.


πŸ“Œ Final Note:

The letter is from a lawyer.
The trauma is from a government.
The burden is on a mother.
And the silence, still —
is from the State.



I Had to Write the Constitution Back to the People Who Forgot It

 πŸ“œ SWANK Dispatch: When Human Rights Must Be Petitioned to Protect Children from the State

πŸ—“️ 15 July 2020

Filed Under: human rights petition, social work abuse, illegal medical examination, lawful homeschooling, systemic trauma, constitutional breach, public health endangerment, procedural failure, retaliation for complaints


“You have not treated us fairly. You have not protected our lives.
You have broken the law, and called it care.”

— A Mother Who Petitioned the Human Rights Commission with a Timeline Longer Than the Pandemic


In this ten-page letter to the Human Rights CommissionPolly Chromatic lays bare 3.5 years of sustained abuse by the Department of Social Development, escalating from unwanted visits to medical assault — all under the guise of safeguarding. With statutes cited, timelines presented, and health risks documented, this is not a complaint.
It is an indictment.


🧾 I. The Legal Core

Section 17(6) of the Children (Care and Protection) Ordinance, 2015
States that parents must receive a written report of any investigation.

Status: Not once. Not ever.

Emergency Powers (COVID-19) Regulations, 2020
Restricted entry into private residences except under clear emergency or essential worker capacity, with ID.

Status: Breached on 26 March 2020.

Education Ordinance, 2009
Recognises homeschool as a valid educational path with Ministerial approval.

Status: Approval granted — then ignored by every other department.


⚠️ II. Documented Harms

  • Sexual assault of her sons during forced hospital exams in front of 9 adults (2017)

  • Repeated home invasions, including fence removal (2019)

  • Property defacement, neighbour violence, and threats

  • Medical instructions from a doctor contradicting UK NHS guidance

  • Emotional abuse, gaslighting, and repeated interruptions of homeschooling

All while suffering from severe eosinophilic asthma — a condition that makes every uninvited visit a potential death sentence.


πŸ“… III. The Timeline of Lawbreaking

  • 2016–2020: Dozens of interventions, no reports

  • 2017: Approval to homeschool granted by Mark Garland

  • 2017–2020: Truancy threats continue regardless

  • 2020: COVID violations escalate with visits during lockdown

“They questioned my compost toilet.
They never questioned whether their actions were lawful.”


🧠 IV. Fundamental Rights Violated

  • πŸ›‘ Right to Life

  • πŸ›‘ Protection from Inhuman Treatment

  • πŸ›‘ Right to Private and Family Life

  • πŸ›‘ Protection of Religion, Conscience, and Health Standards

  • πŸ›‘ Right to Education

  • πŸ›‘ Protection from Discrimination

  • πŸ›‘ Lawful Administrative Action

This isn’t accidental.
This is a pattern of procedural contempt.



Documented Obsessions