⟡ Atlas of AI — On the Aesthetic Cartography of Extraction ⟡
Filed: 16 October 2025
Reference: SWANK/BIBLIOGRAPHIC-EVIDENCE/PC-1135
Download PDF: 2025-10-16_SWANK_Addendum_AtlasOfAI_BibliographicEvidence.pdf
Summary: The definitive treatise on how artificial intelligence plunders the planet, repackages inequality as progress, and insists on applause.
I. What Happened
Kate Crawford’s Atlas of AI performs a slow autopsy on the myth of intelligence.
Each chapter traces a crime scene disguised as innovation — the mine posing as a laboratory, the data centre masquerading as a brain.
It is a geography of hubris: a system that consumes minerals, labour, and meaning, and calls it “thinking.”
II. What the Document Establishes
That artificial intelligence is a supply chain of delusion.
That data is not neutral but colonial, and every algorithm is a bureaucrat with amnesia.
That efficiency is merely cruelty written in code.
That progress, when unexamined, is indistinguishable from extraction.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because SWANK recognises the same pathology in public administration as Crawford maps in computation — an addiction to abstraction.
Both social workers and silicon chips claim impartiality while performing surveillance.
Both reduce human lives to “manageable data.”
SWANK therefore admits Atlas of AI as corroborating evidence in The Case of Humanity v. Administrative Convenience.
IV. Applicable Standards & Violations
• Article 8 ECHR – Interference with private and family life under algorithmic pretence.
• Equality Act 2010 – Indirect discrimination via automated policy.
• UN Declaration on the Rights of Data Subjects – Ignored entirely.
• The basic decency clause – repealed by software update.
V. SWANK’s Position
This is not a book review.
This is an evidentiary curation of technological narcissism.
SWANK does not admire the “AI revolution.”
SWANK documents it as the latest administrative costume for old empire.
Automation, like safeguarding, is simply obedience with better branding.
⟡ This Entry Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every paragraph is jurisdictional. Every adjective is admissible. Every keystroke is an indictment.
This is not commentary.
This is jurisprudence wearing couture.
Because evidence deserves elegance —
and extraction deserves exposure.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting rights reserved. Unlicensed reproduction will be cited as panic, not authorship.
⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer
This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd (United Kingdom)
and SWANK London LLC (United States of America).
Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected.
Every division operates under dual sovereignty: UK evidentiary law and U.S. constitutional speech protection.
This document does not contain confidential family court material.
It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings —
including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints.
All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation.
This is not a breach of privacy.
It is the preservation of truth.
Protected under Article 10 ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act (UK), and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,
alongside all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive,
and writing is how I survive this pain.
Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed
in accordance with SWANK International Protocols — dual-jurisdiction evidentiary standards,
registered under SWANK London Ltd (UK) and SWANK London LLC (USA).
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd (UK) & SWANK London LLC (USA)
All formatting, typographic, and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence.
Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.