“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label EPO Origin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EPO Origin. Show all posts

In re Inflation by Inhalation: Oxygen at 44%, Damages at 118 Million


๐Ÿชž WHEN A LIE COSTS MILLIONS: Raising the Damages on a Government-Imposed Myth

⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive

Filed: 9 July 2025
Reference Code: SWANK-DMG-0711-INCREASE
Filename: 2025-07-11_SWANK_DamagesClaim_Update_FalseReferralTrigger.pdf
Summary: A false medical allegation built this case. SWANK will now invoice it accordingly.

I. What Happened

On the strength of a provably false medical claim — alleging intoxication during a critical asthma event — the safeguarding system launched a full intervention against Polly Chromatic and her four U.S. citizen children.

The social work apparatus did not investigate the medical context.
They did not verify the hospital metrics.
They repeated the accusation as gospel — and structured an entire case around it.

Now, the truth is court-filed.
And the civil claim must be revised to reflect the scale of the harm.

II. Updated Damages Summary by Category

๐Ÿ”น Medical Negligence (St Thomas’ NHS Trust)

  • False referral from hospital misreporting 44% oxygen as “intoxication”

  • Failure to retrieve and preserve medical records (CCTV, staff notes)

  • Resulting in mislabelled risk, psychological trauma, and social work escalation
    Increase: +£8,000,000

๐Ÿ”น Safeguarding Retaliation (Westminster/RBKC)

  • Removal via EPO based on disproven event

  • Failure to conduct independent assessments or validate medical history

  • Sustained obstruction and misrepresentation of “risk”
    Increase: +£10,000,000

๐Ÿ”น Disability Discrimination

  • Failure to accommodate diagnosed asthma, PTSD, and vocal disability

  • Suppression of medical facts in decision-making

  • Use of misdiagnosis as a justification for child removal
    Increase: +£5,000,000

๐Ÿ”น Procedural Harassment & Emotional Harm

  • False intoxication narrative caused lasting reputational damage

  • Public agencies failed to amend or retract false records

  • Ongoing stress, trauma, and litigation burden placed on parent and children
    Increase: +£7,000,000

๐Ÿงฎ Total Claim Increase:

+£30,000,000, bringing the current N1 damages claim total to:
£118,000,000.00

III. SWANK’s Position

This isn’t just about inflated numbers — it’s about exact calibration.

One falsehood triggered this state machinery.
That falsehood has now been unmasked in the evidentiary record.
The system must now pay accordingly for the harm it scaled upon a lie.

Every court that ruled on this matter did so without the truth.
That truth is now filed.

⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Downloaded via www.swanklondon.com
Not edited. Not deleted. Only documented.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

In Re: The Origin of the Error – Gaslighting at 44 Percent Saturation


๐’ช๐“๐“Ž๐‘”๐‘’๐“ƒ, ๐’ช๐“…๐“‰๐’พ๐’ธ๐“ˆ & ๐’ช๐“‹๐‘’๐“‡๐“‡๐‘’๐’ถ๐’ธ๐’ฝ

A SWANK London Ltd. Postmortem on the Allegation That Launched a Case

๐Ÿ“Ž Filed: 9 July 2025

Reference Code: SWANK-ADD-0711-INTX-OXYGEN
Court File Name: 2025-07-09_Addendum_EPOOrigin_FalseIntoxication_44PercentO2
Case No: ZC25C50281
Jurisdiction: Public Law – Central Family Court
PDF Download: Included in bundle filed to court and UN
Summary: The only cited “safeguarding risk” that justified Local Authority involvement was a hospital misreading — from a woman gasping for oxygen to a woman accused of being drunk.

I. What Happened

On 2 November 2023, Polly Chromatic attended St Thomas’ Hospital with a venous oxygen saturation of 44% — a medical emergency. Rather than recognise the visible respiratory collapse and neurological distress, hospital staff misread the situation as intoxication and falsely reported her to safeguarding authorities.

There was no tox screen. No diagnosis of intoxication. Just: “no abnormality detected” and a report filed.

This was the only event ever cited as the origin of Westminster Children’s Services’ involvement.

II. What the Addendum Establishes

The full blood gas panel submitted as Exhibit A (see PDF) confirms:

  • Oxygen saturation (SO2): 44.0%

  • Oxyhaemoglobin: 43.4%

  • Deoxyhaemoglobin: 55.2%

These are not the markers of drunkenness — they are the markers of a dying person.

The court has now been provided with the data that disproves the only trigger for the entire safeguarding apparatus.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

This wasn’t a referral — it was a misdiagnosis weaponised into a child protection case.

From this one false referral grew a two-year campaign of surveillance, hostility, and eventual child removal, culminating in an Emergency Protection Order with no new incident, no risk threshold, and no legitimate procedural ground.

To protect face, the authorities created procedural theatre, relied on institutional muscle memory, and ignored both the parent’s evidence and the hospital’s original sin.

IV. Violations

  • Safeguarding Weaponisation

  • Medical Negligence & Misreporting

  • False Referral and Defamatory Assumption

  • Disability Misunderstanding (Asthma & Dysphonia)

  • Procedural Abuse under Children Act 1989 and Human Rights Act 1998

V. SWANK’s Position

The EPO is not simply “flawed.”
It is invalid at origin.
A foundation built on falsehood cannot support any lawful order.

This post and court filing will stand as a permanent record of the fact that a woman with 44% oxygen saturation — who survived to advocate — was falsely accused and punished for seeking medical help.
Her children were taken.
This is what started the case.
This is what ends it.

⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Downloaded via www.swanklondon.com
Not edited. Not deleted. Only documented.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments: