Filed in Ink. Written in Retaliation. Archived in Public.

---

⟡ “Chronology of Harm, Addendum of Shame.” ⟡

This addendum provides the condensed timeline of retaliatory safeguarding, disability discrimination, and communication obstruction, naming specific staff and filing it as legal evidence.

Filed: 18 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/RBKC-WCC/CHRONOLOGY-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-18_SWANK_MasterAddendum_RBKC_Westminster_AbuseChronology.pdf
This document is filed alongside the Master Abuse Record and forms part of both the N1 civil claim and judicial review.

---

I. What Happened

Between December 2023 and May 2024, Polly Chromatic faced:

• False safeguarding referrals

• Retaliation for medical complaints

• Written objections to unlawful procedures

• Escalations by professionals who ignored medical disability

• Chronic violation of Equality Act adjustments and ECHR protections

---

II. What the Addendum Establishes

• That specific individuals (Issa, Kendall, Hornal, Peache, Gabby) engaged in provable misconduct

• That objections were made in writing and ignored

• That legal rights were bypassed under the guise of “child protection”

• That this file is intended for regulators, international protections, and active litigation

---

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because memory can be contested — but chronology cannot.
Because they escalated while she was medically incapacitated.
Because this record doesn’t just speak — it testifies.

---

IV. Violations

• Equality Act 2010 – Sections 20 & 26: Adjustment refusal and disability-based harassment

• Working Together 2018 – Misuse of safeguarding process

• ECHR Articles 3 & 8 – Cruel, degrading treatment and family interference

• GDPR Articles 5 & 16 – Factual inaccuracy and misuse of data

• Human Rights Act 1998 – Ignoring disability risk in social care escalation

---

V. SWANK’s Position

This is the addendum they hoped wouldn’t exist.
A clear, sealed file naming them all.
No email they send now can undo this record.

And no denial can erase the date it was filed.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

She Wrote Their Code of Conduct for Them. They Declined to Read It.

---

⟡ She Sent Them a Guide to Ethics. They Left It Unread. ⟡
When the only professional development offered is by the person they’re targeting.

Filed: 12 January 2025
Reference: SWANK/RBKC-WCC/EMAIL-22
📎 Download PDF – 2025-01-12_SWANK_Email_GlenPeache_EthicsGuide_To_CouncilStaff_DisabilityMisconductContext.pdf
A precise and quietly eviscerating email sent by the parent to council staff and legal representatives, offering a structured guide to ethical behaviour — because none had been demonstrated. Not a plea. Not a threat. Just ten universal principles of moral conduct — sent from the target to her investigators.

---

I. What Happened

After months of disability dismissal, procedural gaslighting, and boundary invasion,
she took a new approach:
– No accusation.
– No complaint.
– Just an unsolicited ethics syllabus.

She CC’d every relevant actor — Glen Peache, Sarah Newman, Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Eric Wedge-Bull, Annabelle Kapoor, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara.
She included sections on:
– Honesty, fairness, and justice
– Confidentiality, accountability, and environmental responsibility
– Courage, humility, and professional integrity

They replied to none of it.

---

II. What the Email Establishes

• That the parent attempted a professional and educational intervention in response to misconduct

• That the message was ignored by all parties — including legal counsel and safeguarding leads

• That institutional actors were directly offered ethical standards — and declined the invitation to engage

• That ethical clarity came only from the person being surveilled

• That no one currently involved in the case could claim ignorance of right conduct after this point

---

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because when a parent writes a ten-point code of ethics and no one replies,
it says everything.
Because this was the most polite form of confrontation ever sent.
And because offering grace to your accusers — and watching them ignore it —
makes the misconduct even clearer.

---

IV. Violations Identified

• Institutional Refusal to Acknowledge or Respond to Ethical Accountability Request

• Multi-Agency Disregard for Non-Hostile Communication from Targeted Individual

• Erosion of Professional Standards in Legal and Safeguarding Practice

• Complicity by Inaction Following Ethical Clarification

• Dismissal of Trauma-Informed and Educational Intervention Attempt

---

V. SWANK’s Position

This wasn’t an email.
It was a final offer.
A last attempt to appeal to their decency —
and they proved, by silence, they had none.
If this is what gets ignored,
then they’ve chosen misconduct.
Consciously.

---

Would you like this filed under your Professional Incompetence Chronicle and linked to the Council-wide Ethics Blackout series?⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

Ten Years of Saying the Same Thing, and Still No One Listens.

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 10 January 2025
MISUNDERSTANDINGS? NO, WILLFUL IGNORANCE.
Also titled: “Ten Years of Saying the Same Thing, and Still No One Listens.”

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Communication Breakdown · Panic Attacks · Institutional Neglect · Email Ignorance · Social Worker Defiance · Mental Health Crisis · SWANK Chronic Distress Log

---

To the Selectively Illiterate:

Glen Peache, Sarah Newman, Eric Wedge-Bull, Kirsty Hornal, Rhiannon Hodgson, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Samira Issa
Cc: aaforbes@gov.tc, alsmith@gov.tc, Annabelle Kapoor
Bcc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi, Nannette Nicholson

---

📩 THE EMAILS THAT CAUSED A CRISIS—BECAUSE YOU REFUSED TO READ

“The refusal of humans to read my emails and/or not take me seriously is causing me panic attacks since it’s the only way I can communicate.”
“I don’t know how else to explain it. I’ve been saying the same thing for ten years and no one wants to read or listen.”

This is not ambiguity. This is documentation.
This is not emotional instability. It’s institutional cruelty disguised as procedure.

---

🧠 TRANSLATION FOR THE PROFESSIONALY HARD-OF-READING:

– Written communication is not optional for disabled people.
– Ignoring it is not minor. It is medical malpractice.
– Panic attacks are not personality flaws. They are evidence of your failure.

You are not misunderstood. You are unfit.

---

⚠️ THIS IS A CRISIS, NOT A QUIBBLE

The refusal to accommodate written communication for a disabled mother is not just a bureaucratic blunder.
It is neglect, cloaked in procedure.
It is discrimination, typed in Times New Roman.
It is violence, filed as “no reply necessary.”

---

Polly Chromatic
Typing to be heard. Fighting to breathe. Archiving to outlast.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Distress Logged. All Excuses Rejected.

---

If I Could Speak to You, I Wouldn't Be Writing This

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 12 January 2025
EXHAUSTION IS A MEDICAL CONDITION, NOT A CHARACTER FLAW

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Muscle Tension Dysphonia · Eosinophilic Asthma · Panic Disorder · Verbal Access Denied · Invisible Illness Prejudice · SWANK Medical Boundaries Archive

---

To the Recipients of My Silence:

Glen Peache, Sarah Newman, Eric Wedge-Bull, Kirsty Hornal, Rhiannon Hodgson, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Samira Issa, Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi
Cc: aaforbes@gov.tc, alsmith@gov.tc, Annabelle Kapoor, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Harley Street Mental Health
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson

---

🫁 The Diagnoses You Glance At But Never Grasp

“I’m really struggling with my muscle dysphonia, eosinophilic asthma, and panic attacks…”

These are not feelings. They are documented, indexed, and clinically observed medical realities.
But to you, exhaustion is an attitude, not a pathology. Vocal injury is “tone.” Asthma is “stress.”
And trauma? Something you perform seminars on while triggering it live.

---

🔇 Vocal Rest Is Not a Mood. It Is a Prescription.

“...sometimes taking over a week to recover enough to talk and breathe comfortably again.”

Silence is not opposition. It is triage.
If you require breathlessness to prove I’m ill, you are neither a professional nor a person worth speaking to.

---

🧠 You Call It Drama. I Call It Documentation.

“The hostility or blame from others only makes everything worse.”

This is not non-compliance. This is diagnosed physiological collapse misread as defiance.
And the more you demand verbal performance, the further you expose your own diagnostic illiteracy.

You want compliance? Try competence.

---

Polly Chromatic
Unheard. Unmoved. Unapologetically Unavailable.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breaths Withheld.

---

Ten Things You’d Know If You Were Actually Qualified to Hold Power

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 12 January 2025
PATTERNS OF ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR: A REFRESHER COURSE FOR THE CONSCIENCELESS

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Ethical Remediation Toolkit · Social Worker Re-Education · Professional Dignity Collapse · RBKC/WCC Integrity Vacuum · SWANK Moral Restoration Bureau

---

To the Department Formerly Known as ‘Professionals’:

Glen Peache, Sarah Newman, Eric Wedge-Bull, Kirsty Hornal, Rhiannon Hodgson, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Samira Issa
Cc: aaforbes@gov.tc, alsmith@gov.tc, Annabelle Kapoor
Bcc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi

---

✏️ A Public Service Announcement (Disguised as a Lecture)

Somewhere between your safeguarding theatre and the false allegations you mistook for duties, you misplaced your ethical foundations.
Not to worry. I’ve curated a syllabus.

---

🧭 THE LOST CURRICULUM — AN ETHICAL SKELETON KEY

1. Honesty & Transparency
– State your actions plainly. Conceal nothing you’d penalise in others.
→ Impact: Public trust. Currently absent.

2. Fairness & Justice
– No vendettas. No tokenism. No procedural show trials.
→ Impact: Legitimacy, if you remember what that feels like.

3. Respect for Persons
– Interrupting disabled parents mid-breath? Not noble.
→ Impact: Credibility, faintly possible.

4. Accountability
– Stand behind your own paperwork. No ghostwriters in lanyards.
→ Impact: Consequence, at last.

5. Altruism
– Helping someone while punishing their tone? That’s not altruism. That’s performance.
→ Impact: Actual support.

6. Confidentiality
– Private data is not a whisper network.
→ Impact: One less FOI on your desk.

7. Courage
– Write the truth, even if it contradicts your strategy.
→ Impact: Heroism, albeit unfamiliar.

8. Humility
– Try: “We were wrong.” It won’t kill you.
→ Impact: Professional rebirth.

9. Environmental Responsibility
– Stop triggering asthma in medically fragile homes.
→ Impact: Breathable air. Imagine.

10. Professional Integrity
– No falsified notes. No weaponised minutes. No polished lies.
→ Impact: Legal documents that don’t read like satire.

---

Polly Chromatic
Archivist of Behavioural Decay · Unpaid Ethics Consultant to Her Majesty’s Dismal Services
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Codes of Conduct Archived. All Virtues Filed.

---

If You Don’t Understand This Email, You Shouldn’t Be Working in Child Protection.

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 12 January 2025
ETHICS: A GUIDE FOR THE WOEFULLY UNDERQUALIFIED
(Also known as: The Curriculum You Never Received but Desperately Require)

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Moral Education for State Agents · RBKC Value Deficiency Index · Behavioural Patterning Memo · Anti-Gaslight Correspondence · SWANK Ethical Emergency

---

📬 Circulated To:

Glen Peache, Sarah Newman, Eric Wedge-Bull, Kirsty Hornal, Rhiannon Hodgson, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Samira Issa
Cc: aaforbes@gov.tc, alsmith@gov.tc, Annabelle Kapoor
Bcc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi

---

✨ Ten Patterns of Ethical Behaviour for the Value-Deficient Professional

You claimed to need training.
I obliged.
Here lies the unsolicited induction course from your most persistent accountability specialist.

---

1. Honesty & Transparency
Admit fault. Name truth. Disclose what matters.
🕳 If you’re redacting to self-protect, you’ve already disqualified yourself from service.

2. Fairness & Justice
Equal treatment ≠ equal failure.
📉 Cease targeting whistleblowers while coddling incompetence.

3. Respect for Others
Particularly the disabled. Especially the unafraid.
🎧 Try silence. It’s less oppressive than your standard interruptions.

4. Accountability
Forwarding isn't accountability. Nor is “noted.”
🧾 If you can't carry the consequences, don't issue the decisions.

5. Altruism
Policy compliance is not compassion.
💸 Being paid to care is not the same as caring.

6. Confidentiality
Stop broadcasting family names in mixed-email chains.
🔒 You’re not in reception gossip. You’re in statutory breach.

7. Courage
Draft the real minutes. Submit the real report.
🎙 Integrity is not conditional on office consensus.

8. Humility
Learning is not beneath you. Though perhaps ethics are.
🥀 If you've never said sorry, you're overdue.

9. Environmental Responsibility
Respiratory harm counts too.
🌫 If your visit induces breathlessness, you are not delivering support—you are delivering trauma.

10. Professional Integrity
Post-complaint edits are not policy—they're pathology.
📚 Start showing up like you're human, not rehearsed.

---

Polly Chromatic
Self-Appointed Ethics Instructor to the Bureaucratically Bewildered
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Moral Failures Annotated. All Behavioural Drift Logged.

---

Why My Body Literally Rebels When You Enter the Room.

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 2 February 2025
ON THE PATHOLOGY OF IRRESPONSIBILITY: AN IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Asthma Trigger Documentation · Social Worker Aversion Reflex · Bureaucratic Panic Induction · Irresponsibility Syndrome · SWANK Behavioural Pathogen Memo

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Philip Reid, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Gideon Mpalanyi, Rachel Pullen, Eric Wedge-Bull, Rhiannon Hodgson, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Annabelle Kapoor, Samira Issa, Glen Peache
Cc: alsmith@gov.tc, aaforbes@gov.tc, Nannette Nicholson
Bcc: Documented on the astral plane.

---

🧪 THE MOST DANGEROUS VIRUS I KNOW: IRRESPONSIBILITY

“Social workers are the most consistently irresponsible group of people I’ve ever met.”

Not undertrained.
Not underpaid.
Irresponsible—willfully, institutionally, and without consequence.
Where others bring professionalism, you bring a pathogen.

---

😤 PHYSIOLOGICAL OUTCOME: ASTHMA. PANIC. DISGUST.

“The lack of accountability and the pervasive irresponsibility cause me asthma attacks and panic attacks.”

This isn’t metaphor.
This is a medical reaction.
Your visits, your delays, your bureaucratic theatre—all of it lands in my lungs.
You are not “providing care.”
You are a walking aerosol of neglect.

---

🚫 THIS IS A BOUNDARY. NOT A REQUEST.

“I’m tired of being forced to have these irresponsible people in my home and in my life.”

If your presence makes me sick, your absence is treatment.
I don’t need support. I need quarantine—from you.

---

📎 ADDENDUM: I DO NOT SPEAK. I DO NOT PHONE. I WILL NOT REPEAT.

“Please note: I cannot speak verbally. Please email only. I do not own a phone.”

It’s not a preference.
It’s an adjustment.
And if you can’t handle typing, you’re unfit to safeguard anyone—especially the chronically unheard.

---

Polly Chromatic
Allergic to misconduct. Unvaccinated against bureaucratic ineptitude.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Symptoms Recorded.

---

Why Bureaucratic Incompetence is Literally Gasping-for-Air Material

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 2 February 2025
ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IRRESPONSIBILITY
Also Filed As: "Administrative Allergy and the Case of the Wheezing Plaintiff"

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Social Worker Irresponsibility · Panic-Inducing Bureaucracy · Asthma Exacerbation · Administrative Allergy · SWANK Disgust Index

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Philip Reid, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Gideon Mpalanyi, Rachel Pullen, Eric Wedge-Bull, Rhiannon Hodgson, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Annabelle Kapoor, Samira Issa, Glen Peache
Cc: alsmith@gov.tc, aaforbes@gov.tc, Nannette Nicholson

---

🤧 I’M ALLERGIC TO IRRESPONSIBILITY. LITERALLY.

“The lack of accountability and the pervasive irresponsibility cause me asthma attacks and panic attacks.”

Your names are not on the medication.
But your negligence is in the bloodstream.
You are no longer professionals.
You are airborne irritants—credentialed and chemically destabilising.

---

🧍🏽‍♀️ I DON’T WANT YOU IN MY HOME. I DON’T WANT YOU IN MY AIR.

“I’m tired of being forced to have these irresponsible people in my home and in my life.”

This is not a tantrum.
This is a triage response.
When the so-called service enters the premises, so do the symptoms.
Your visits constitute an environmental hazard.

---

📎 I CAN’T SPEAK. I SHOULDN’T HAVE TO REPEAT MYSELF.

“Please note: I cannot speak verbally. Please email only. I do not own a phone.”

If you require phonation to comprehend safeguarding,
you are categorically unfit for the job.
Refusal to accommodate is not oversight—it is malpractice.

---

Polly Chromatic
Disgusted. Documented. Disqualified from silence.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Symptoms Prosecuted.

---

You Call It Concern. We Call It a Respiratory Virus Every Time You Knock.

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 4 February 2025
WE AREN’T “RESISTANT TO SERVICES.” YOU’RE RESISTANT TO DIAGNOSIS.
Also archived as: “Pathogen Theatre in the Disguised Form of a Welfare Visit.”

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Medical Harassment · Eosinophilic Asthma · Social Worker Contamination · Institutional Denial · Disability Erasure · SWANK Immunocompromised Archives

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Annabelle Kapoor, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Gideon Mpalanyi, Rachel Pullen, Eric Wedge-Bull, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Rhiannon Hodgson, Samira Issa, Glen Peache, Philip Reid, aaforbes@gov.tc, alsmith@gov.tc
Bcc: Phil @ Sangye Yoga

---

🧬 RESPIRATORY COLLAPSE IS NOT “PARENTAL NON-COOPERATION.”

“Every time a social worker comes in our home we are all sick for the next two to four weeks with a respiratory virus.”

This is not a metaphor.
This is viral epidemiology dressed up as safeguarding.
You arrive in lanyards and leave as vectors.

---

📚 THIS ISN’T SUPPORT. IT’S SYSTEMIC VANDALISM.

“Homeschooling, work, social activities, and my kids’ classes have all been negatively affected by your insistence on continuing to interfere…”

Your presence subtracts from every sphere of life.
You’ve weaponised bureaucracy into a domestic pollutant.

---

🩺 TEN YEARS OF MEDICAL EVIDENCE. DENIED BY CLIPBOARD.

“I have stated repeatedly that we all suffer from eosinophilic asthma… you have all refused to take me seriously.”

The condition is real.
The documentation is plentiful.
The disbelief is manufactured.

---

📎 VERBAL REFUSAL REMAINS LEGALLY BINDING.

“Please note: I cannot speak verbally. Please email only. I do not own a phone.”

This is not a preference.
It is a protected adjustment.
Your continued disregard is a breach—medically and legally.

---

Polly Chromatic
Immunocompromised. Impeccably documented. Immune to bureaucratic gaslighting.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Contagion Logged.

---

Why My Lungs Burn When You Talk About Safeguarding.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 4 February 2025
TOXIC GAS, SOCIAL GASLIGHTING, AND THE TEN-YEAR PLAN TO IGNORE US

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Sewer Gas Poisoning · Institutional Harassment · Respiratory Disability · Safeguarding Theatre · Medical Disbelief · Telepathic Correspondence · SWANK Environmental Health Dispatch

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Annabelle Kapoor, Laura Savage, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Simon O'Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Eric Wedge-Bull, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Rhiannon Hodgson, Samira Issa, Glen Peache, Philip Reid, alsmith@gov.tc, aaforbes@gov.tc
Bcc: phil@sangyeyoga.com

---

💨 WE WERE POISONED. YOU MISDIAGNOSED. THEN ESCALATED.

“We all suffered from sewer gas poisoning in October of 2023 and went to the hospital to be treated, where I was attacked by hospital staff five times over six months instead of being treated.”

You saw chemical exposure and inferred behavioural deviance.
You replaced toxicology with prejudice.
And you called it safeguarding.

---

🔁 SICK FROM THE SYSTEM, THEN SICK FROM YOU

“You escalated the case based on the fact that I was so sick at the time that I could barely breathe or talk…”

Rather than assist, you doubled down.
Rather than apologise, you investigated.
You interpreted collapse as non-compliance—and brought more bacteria.

---

🧠 IF YOU REFUSE TO READ, DON’T BLAME ME FOR NOT SPEAKING

“I suffer from a disability… I prefer to communicate telepathically… however, email is fine.”

This is not eccentricity. This is reasonable adjustment.
Refusal to accommodate is not a clerical oversight—it’s unlawful.

---

📎 THE REPORT YOU NEVER COMMISSIONED

Hydrogen sulfide. Methane. Ammonia. Carbon dioxide.
Result: Neurological insult. Respiratory trauma. Systemic dismissal.

Instead of intervention, you offered interrogation.
Instead of empathy, escalation.

---

Polly Chromatic
Poisoned, prosecuted, pathologised—never pacified.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Toxins Tracked.

---

When a Child Collapses, He Replies with Procedural Theatre.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 18 February 2024
GLEN RESPONDED—BUT ONLY TO DOWNPLAY THE DAMAGE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Glen Peache · Post-Collapse Dismissals · NHS Gaslighting Partnership · Email Delays · Council Blame Redirection · SWANK Institutional Failure Index

---

To:

Glen Peache
Cc: Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Simon O’Meara, Laura Savage
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Relevant Medical Neglect Units

---

🧾 YOUR “RESPONSE” ARRIVED ONLY AFTER A CHILD COLLAPSED.

“Thank you for your email. I am sorry to hear about your experiences at the hospital and your daughter’s health.”
“Please let me know how you would like me to respond.”

She collapsed.
You emailed.
And somehow still positioned yourself as passive recipient of instruction, rather than a safeguarding officer tasked with preventing medical catastrophe.

---

🫁 YOUR NHS PARTNERS NEARLY KILLED HER. YOU PASSED THE COMPLAINT TO THEM?

“We would advise discussing any safeguarding concerns you may have directly with the hospital via their complaints or PALS service.”

This is not a hospital review.
It is an incident of interagency neglect.
And your response confirms a pattern of bureaucratic outsourcing in the face of respiratory collapse.

---

📩 THIS IS NOT A BACK-AND-FORTH. IT’S AN EVIDENCE TRAIL.

You are not waiting for my “instruction.”
You are being archived—for lethargy in the face of crisis.
Each polite delay will be used in court to evidence structural gaslighting.

---

Polly Chromatic
Chronically right. Systemically dismissed. Noted accordingly.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Inactions Logged.

---

You Were Notified. You Delayed. She Collapsed.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 18 February 2024
GLEN’S FAILURE TO RESPOND TO CHILD MEDICAL EMERGENCIES, NOW FORMALLY RECORDED.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Glen’s Inaction · Child Respiratory Crisis · Safeguarding Failure · Council Delay Tactics · Asthma Emergency Mismanagement · SWANK Medical Neglect Ledger

---

To:

Glen Peache
Cc: Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Simon O’Meara, Laura Savage
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Hospital Complaint Teams

---

🧒🏽 YOU WERE NOTIFIED—YOU IGNORED IT.

“The council has failed to respond to my reports of discrimination and medical harassment which led to my daughter Honor collapsing.”

This is no longer an oversight.
It is the formalisation of your negligence.

---

⏳ TIMELINE OF YOUR NON-RESPONSE:

• 12 February — NHS incident: mistreatment, harm.

• 13 February — Child gasping for air.

• 14 February — Exhausted mother sends written alert.

• 15–17 February — Silence from you.

• 18 February — Collapse confirmed. Prednisone prescribed. Hospital log activated.

You responded only once it could no longer be denied.
And even then, not with action—but with evasion.

---

📎 DOCUMENTED IN MULTIPLE DIMENSIONS:

• Medical evidence

• Legal timelines

• Emotional cost

• Ethical vacuum

• Respiratory damage

• Maternal wrath

All on file. All ready.

---

👩‍👧 THIS IS NOT A COMPLAINT. THIS IS A NOTICE OF PRE-LITIGIOUS RECORD.

What you failed to treat, I will document.
What you failed to act upon, I will immortalise.

---

Polly Chromatic
Mother. Archivist. The oxygen between collapse and deposition.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Emergencies Filed.

---

Safeguarding Wasn’t the Breach. His Endorsement Was.

---

⟡ The Supervisor Who Approved Retaliation as Policy ⟡

Filed: 21 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/SWE/PEACHE-MISCONDUCT
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-21_SWANK_SWE_Complaint_GlenPeache_SafeguardingRetaliation_DisabilityMisconduct_SupervisoryBreach.pdf

---

I. Safeguarding Wasn’t the Breach. His Endorsement Was.

This complaint to Social Work England names Glen Peache, a senior official whose conduct did not merely overlook abuse — it codified it into workflow.

The charges include:

• Ratification of retaliatory safeguarding action against a disabled parent

• Knowingly breaching a written-only adjustment in a supervisory capacity

• Failing to intervene when caseworkers weaponised contact procedures

• Allowing trauma documentation to be dismissed without consequence

The misconduct wasn’t rogue.
It was managerial — and approved by font.

---

II. When Supervision Becomes Strategy

Peache’s position granted him:

• Oversight of known discriminatory patterns

• Authority to de-escalate harm — which he declined

• Access to protected health data and procedural violations

• A professional obligation to intervene, not amplify

Instead:

• He authorised the very breaches reported

• Shielded staff behind “process”

• Permitted silence as a form of defence

He supervised retaliation.
SWANK supervised the filing.

---

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because supervision is not a loophole.
Because retaliation in the name of “procedure” is still abuse.
Because when misconduct becomes endorsed, every line manager becomes a named party.

Let the record show:

• The adjustment was in writing

• The safeguarding threat was tactical

• The supervision was informed

• And SWANK — filed, formatted, and timestamped the entire structure

This wasn’t inaction.
It was policy-grade harm, notarised at the managerial level.

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not excuse oversight failures when they enable institutional abuse.
We do not accept that managers can feign ignorance of coordinated harm.
We do not redact names once the supervision becomes the strategy.

Let the record show:

He read the files.
He approved the breach.
He oversaw the harm.
And SWANK — filed the evidence to Social Work England.

This isn’t a rogue incident.
It’s the supervisory system as accomplice — and we filed the chain of command.

---

---

---