“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label respiratory harm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label respiratory harm. Show all posts

Chromatic v The Receptionist: On the Institutional Refusal to Accommodate Disabled Breathing


๐ŸชžSWANK LOG ENTRY

The Breathing Capacity Doctrine

Or, When Access to Care Is Denied for Refusing to Perform Phone Politeness

Filed: 1 November 2024
Reference Code: SWK-DISABILITY-ACCESS-2024-11
PDF Filename: 2024-11-01_SWANK_Letter_Westminster_PhoneBasedDiscrimination.pdf
One-Line Summary: Polly Chromatic reminds Westminster that disability accommodations are not optional — and phone-based systems are not neutral.

I. What Happened

In a moment of exhausted clarity, Polly Chromatic sent an email declaring:

“I don’t have time or energy or breathing capacity to argue with people over the phone.”

It was not a complaint. It was a diagnosis of institutional communication failure.

She needed a simple thing:
→ A medical appointment for her son, Regal.
She encountered a predictable thing:
→ Discrimination.
The reason?
→ She does not call. She emails — as required by her disability.

And still, they ask her to phone in. Again.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

This brief email names, precisely:

  • The unlawful expectation that disabled people conform to standard phone systems

  • The total absence of adjustment protocols

  • The emotional, physical, and respiratory toll of being required to “argue” to access care

  • The threat of escalation — because yes, it is a police matter when disability rights are breached

This isn’t about tone. It’s about access.
This isn’t a communication preference. It’s a statutory protection.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this email demonstrates what the Equality Act was written for.

Because no one with a diagnosed respiratory condition should be forced to fight for breath by telephone.

Because every GP surgery and local authority still pretending email isn’t valid deserves to be archived.

And because Polly didn’t just say it was discrimination — she said it was discrimination again.

This is the repeat performance.
The rerun of rights denial.
And it’s being documented — in stereo.

IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 – Failure to provide alternative communication method as reasonable adjustment

  • Article 14 ECHR – Discrimination on the basis of disability in accessing health

  • Health and Care Act 2022 – Non-compliance with patient access obligations

  • Professional Negligence – Blocking respiratory support by design

  • Safeguarding Contradiction – Punishing the parent who seeks medical help for her child

V. SWANK’s Position

We consider this message a flagship example of administrative gatekeeping, wherein public institutions act shocked when you don’t want to plead for help using a method that actively harms you.

Polly Chromatic does not owe anyone a phone call.
She owes her children care.
And anyone who inserts a receptionist between a disabled mother and her son’s medical appointment is not protecting welfare — they are obstructing it.

Let the archive reflect: the next time someone says “just call,” they are asking for an act of violence by design.

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

You Got the Email Before the Collapse. You Just Didn’t Want It to Be Real.


⟡ “It Hurts to Speak. But You Still Expect a Performance.” ⟡
An exhausted but deliberate message from Polly Chromatic to Westminster safeguarding officer Kirsty Hornal and legal counsel Simon O’Meara and Laura Savage. The email is short. Calm. And clear: the parent is in medical crisis. Speech is physically painful. Alternative access options (sign language, email) are proposed. The implication is simple: if you continue to escalate after this, it’s no longer negligence. It’s malice.

Filed: 12 June 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/ACCESS-08
๐Ÿ“Ž Download PDF – 2024-12-06_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_VerbalWithdrawal_SignLanguageRequest_LegalWitnessed.pdf
Message sent to Westminster safeguarding and legal teams during an acute episode of respiratory and verbal disability. Asks for space, minimal contact, and recognition of communication limits. Suggests use of sign language or email. Reinforces that talking causes harm. Does not accuse. Does not plead. Merely informs — and makes the record complete.

I. What Happened

Polly Chromatic sent an email that said:

  • “It hurts too much to talk.”

  • “I feel very sick when I try to speak.”

  • “I know sign language and would rather do that.”

  • “If I have to speak… it could make me pass out.”

She wrote it while struggling to breathe.
She sent it to:

  • Kirsty Hornal

  • Simon O’Meara

  • Laura Savage
    And blind-copied a trusted witness.

No request for sympathy.
Just clarity.
And evidence.

II. What the Email Establishes

  • That verbal communication was medically unsafe

  • That WCC and legal professionals were formally notified

  • That accommodation alternatives were proposed

  • That silence or verbal withdrawal were not avoidance — they were clinical necessity

  • That this message forms part of the “collapse-to-record” sequence

It is the medical moment before the archive went fully non-verbal.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because safeguarding doesn’t mean forcing speech from someone choking. Because access doesn’t mean waiting until it’s convenient for you to care. And because when the system keeps calling meetings you can’t attend, and asking questions you’re not well enough to answer — the only ethical response is a written record that proves they knew.

SWANK archived this because:

  • It is your clearest post-verbal disability notice

  • It introduces alternative access options that were ignored

  • It shows your condition in real time — not theory

  • It is an intake-ready exhibit for clinical negligence and safeguarding retaliation claims

IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 –
    • Section 20: Refusal to adjust procedure when speech is unsafe
    • Section 27: Re-triggering harm through contact after boundary

  • Children Act 1989 –
    • Procedural misuse of CP systems when parent is medically incapacitated

  • Human Rights Act 1998 –
    • Article 3: Psychological and physical harm via procedural aggression
    • Article 8: Violation of family life through unsafe demands

  • SWE / Legal Ethics –
    • Expecting verbal performance from a known disabled parent = misconduct

V. SWANK’s Position

You don’t get to say she was uncooperative when she said: “I’ll use sign language.” You don’t get to treat breathing difficulty like non-engagement. And you definitely don’t get to keep convening meetings when the parent is telling you: “This is making me pass out.”

SWANK London Ltd. classifies this email as a clinical disengagement record, verbal accommodation request, and legal notification of post-verbal communication limits.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

Polly Chromatic v Respiratory Science: A Tragedy in Five Admissions


๐Ÿฉบ “OXYGEN? NO THANK YOU.”

The Medical Mismanagement Timeline That Launched a Safeguarding Fiction

⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive

Filed Date: 11 July 2025
Reference Code: SWK-AUD-0711-MED-RESPCOLL
Filename: 2025-07-11_Audit_MedicalNeglect_RespiratoryCollapse_Timeline.pdf
Summary: The safeguarding claim didn’t begin with neglect — it began with oxygen deprivation and NHS suspicion theatre.

I. What Happened

Before a single social worker rang the doorbell. Before the police ambush. Before the Emergency Protection Order. There was this: a respiratory collapse, a 44% oxygen reading, and a series of non-treatment events masquerading as clinical concern.

Between November 2023 and April 2024, Polly Chromatic presented to four different hospitals in distress. She was:

  • Not treated for asthma.

  • Misread as intoxicated.

  • Falsely accused of racial aggression by a patient who assaulted her.

  • Questioned about her parenting while unable to breathe.

This is not safeguarding. This is sabotage — committed in latex gloves.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

Let’s be clear:
There was no initial “risk.” There was hypoxia, then hysteria — all of it institutional.

Each event on this timeline shows the system:

  • Failing to understand Eosinophilic Asthma

  • Blaming the patient for her own medical crisis

  • Escalating to Local Authority involvement without a single moment of diagnostic clarity

And yet, this timeline became the foundation for the fiction that this mother was unfit. A fiction that spread through safeguarding teams like the respiratory infections they never treated.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because it is no longer enough to say, “There was no threshold.”
Now we must say: “There was a woman whose oxygen was at 44% and nobody helped her.”

Because the removal of four children didn’t begin with any lawful intervention.
It began with a hospital staff member misreading asthma for intoxication, and every agency thereafter choosing to believe the fiction.

This is not “multi-agency safeguarding.”
This is multi-agency defamation — with prescription pads.

IV. Violations

  • ECHR Article 3: Denial of oxygen is not care. It is cruelty.

  • ECHR Article 8: The safeguarding referral destroyed family life on medically disproven grounds.

  • Children Act 1989: Used not to protect, but to persecute.

  • NHS Constitution: Breached. Repeatedly. And with alarming confidence.

V. SWANK’s Position

Every safeguarding act since November 2023 is poisoned by this origin point.
The Local Authority did not identify a risk — they inherited one that never existed.

And the cost?
A mother’s health. Four children’s home.
All because someone couldn’t read an oximeter.

Filed without deletion.
Logged without revision.
Every breath counted.
Except by the people paid to count them.

Polly Chromatic
Founder, SWANK London Ltd.
www.swanklondon.com

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

She Said “We’re Always Sick.” They Said “We’ll Be Back.”


⟡ They Said “Welfare.” She Said “We Get Sick Every Time You Come.” ⟡
When social work investigations cause illness, and no one calls it what it is: medical assault.

Filed: 4 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-19
๐Ÿ“Ž Download PDF – 2025-02-04_SWANK_Email_Kirsty_RespiratoryDisabilityStatement_TenYearsOfHarassment.pdf
A direct and unfiltered email from the parent to Westminster and RBKC officials declaring what their ten years of intrusion have caused: immune compromise, respiratory collapse, and the total erosion of daily life. Her crime? Having a documented disability they refuse to acknowledge.

I. What Happened

She wrote them all — again.
Not to plead, but to document.
Every time they send someone into her home, her entire family falls ill for weeks.
Not once or twice — but every time.
They’ve ignored Eosinophilic Asthma warnings.
They’ve dismissed respiratory triggers.
They’ve chosen suspicion over science.
And for ten years, they’ve taken her life and called it process.

II. What the Email Establishes

  • That safeguarding visits cause clinical illness in the entire household

  • That the parent has disclosed a serious, medically diagnosed condition repeatedly

  • That no accommodations have been made — verbal, spatial, or procedural

  • That ten years of surveillance has resulted in systemic harm

  • That there is no welfare objective — only obsessive control and disbelief

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because when a parent says “you’re making us sick,”
and the State says “we’re just following up,”
someone needs to log the harm.
Because if disbelief causes disease,
you’re no longer doing welfare.
You’re doing damage.

IV. Violations Identified

  • Repeated Exposure of Medically Vulnerable Family to Respiratory Risk

  • Disregard for Disability Disclosures and Required Accommodations

  • Failure to Provide Alternative Contact Methods Despite Verbal Disability

  • Ten-Year Retaliatory Investigation Cycle With No Evidentiary Basis

  • Institutional Denial of Bodily Autonomy and Parental Rights

V. SWANK’s Position

This isn’t “support.”
It’s a biological siege.
They ignore every exemption.
They enter without cause.
They bring illness into a medically fragile household
— and then blame the parent for symptoms.
Ten years.
Still no evidence.
Still no shame.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

Respiratory Harm by Design: Sewer Gas, Safeguarding Theatre, and the Failure to Protect Disabled Families


๐Ÿค SWANK London Ltd.

✒️ Dispatch No. UKHSA-0625-Sewer-Air

Filed Under: Respiratory Negligence, Housing Decay, Public Health Dereliction

To:
UK Health Security Agency
Public Health Directorate

From:
Polly Chromatic
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens
London W2 6JL
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com

Date: June 2025

Subject:
Formal Complaint – Sewer Gas Exposure, Respiratory Harm, and Institutional Failure to Protect a Medically Vulnerable Family

๐Ÿฉบ Public Health in Collapse: A Complaint

Dear Public Health Director,

This correspondence is submitted to report a sustained public health hazard and institutional negligence which, since 2023, has endangered the respiratory and psychological safety of myself and my four children — each medically documented as vulnerable.

I write not in desperation, but in precise remembrance.

I am a disabled mother, diagnosed with:

  • Eosinophilic asthma

  • Muscle tension dysphonia

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) — acquired through prolonged institutional contact

All four of my children have clinically recognised asthma. Despite these clear, codeable vulnerabilities, we have been exposed — repeatedly, preventably — to the following:

⚠️ Documented Environmental Hazards

  • Persistent sewer gas leaks at Flat E, 37 Elgin Crescent, London W11 – acknowledged but unremedied by landlord and council

  • Confirmed mould, airborne contaminants, and water-damage-induced reinfection – triggering respiratory crises, collapse, and loss of consciousness

  • Unprotected home visits by social workers while the household was medically unwell – resulting in cross-infection and symptom escalation

  • Denial of written communication adjustments, worsening conditions by enforcing unsafe verbal contact against medical advice

๐Ÿงพ Public Health Failures Identified

  1. Environmental Neglect
    Despite environmental reports and formal awareness, the housing authority permitted the continued occupation of an uninhabitable property by asthmatic children.

  2. Medical Disregard
    NHS and GP services failed to document or respond to severe respiratory events — including wheezing, collapse, and airway distress.

  3. Safeguarding Theatre
    Safeguarding was weaponised to deflect from environmental accountability. No infection control or protective accommodations were offered.

  4. Medical Suppression
    Social services discouraged hospital attendance and retaliated when environmental hazards were raised through legal channels.

⚖️ Jurisdictional Scope of the UKHSA

This case exemplifies systemic breach in public health protection under the following domains:

  • Indoor air quality oversight

  • Cross-infection policy during state visitation

  • Triage protocols for disabled and respiratory-compromised households

  • Environmental safeguarding blind spots in local authority frameworks

The ongoing refusal to treat environmental illness as a legitimate clinical and safeguarding concern constitutes not only negligence — but policy-level endangerment.

๐ŸŽฏ Relief Sought

I request the UKHSA:

  1. To investigate the conduct of relevant local authorities and NHS bodies in relation to respiratory hazard management

  2. To issue national guidance on sewer gas and air-quality-related asthma in children

  3. To review infection control protocols for state personnel entering medically vulnerable homes

  4. To classify environmental safeguarding negligence as a matter of public health urgency

๐Ÿ—‚ Documentation

All supporting evidence is archived at:
๐Ÿ“‚ www.swanklondon.com

This includes correspondence, medical records, environmental reports, and formal complaints already submitted to:

  • Westminster Children’s Services

  • NHS Trusts

  • CQC

  • Environmental Health

  • PHSO

  • United Nations Special Rapporteurs

๐Ÿ–‹ Access Adjustment

Due to diagnosed disabilities, I am medically exempt from verbal engagement.
All communication must remain in writing.

Yours faithfully,
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Statement


No comments:

The Verbal Refusal of a Breathless Witness

 ๐Ÿ–‹ ๐’ฎ๐’ฒ๐’œ๐’ฉ๐’ฆ Dispatch | 21 November 2024

“๐’ฉ๐‘œ, ๐ผ ๐’ฒ๐‘œ๐“ƒ’๐“‰ ๐’œ๐“‡๐‘”๐“Š๐‘’. ๐ผ’๐“๐“ ๐’œ๐“‡๐’ธ๐’ฝ๐’พ๐“‹๐‘’ ๐’ด๐‘œ๐“Š.”

Filed Under: Verbal Abuse, A&E Misconduct, NHS Deflection, Respiratory Retaliation, SWANK London Ltd

—

“I do not waste my time arguing with people.”

That sentence should be engraved in hospital corridors.

Not because I can’t argue,
but because I no longer perform for systems that weaponise disbelief.

“They either want to help or they don’t.”

And when they don’t?
I don’t escalate. I document.
Because a sovereign woman does not plead for what is hers by right.

“If they don’t want to help, I document it online and move on.”

That’s not passive.
That’s public record management.

“I cannot speak verbally to argue or explain things, period.”

Let me simplify for the NHS:
Verbal interaction is not a diagnostic requirement.
It’s a privileged assumption.

“They bully me every time we have a respiratory issue and don’t believe me.”

You call it triage.
We call it institutional gaslighting with a lanyard.

“My asthma is much worse now because of that ignorant doctor.”

So I won’t argue.
I’ll type. I’ll timestamp. I’ll make the archive louder than your excuses.

—

๐Ÿ“ Typed With Restraint. Published With Precision.
๐’ซ๐‘œ๐“๐“๐“Ž ๐’ž๐’ฝ๐“‡๐‘œ๐“‚๐’ถ๐“‰๐’พ๐’ธ, Oxygen Strategist, Institutional Historian

๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Escalations Digitised.

—

Labels: A&E bullying, asthma exacerbation, verbal ableism, refusal of care, safeguarding distortion, SWANK witness report

—

Search Description:
Mother refuses verbal conflict in A&E due to asthma. Documents NHS bullying and disbelief. Respiratory impact worsened. Institutional response recorded.

No comments:

Verbal Explanations Are Not My Medical Obligation


๐Ÿ–‹ ๐’ฎ๐’ฒ๐’œ๐’ฉ๐’ฆ Dispatch | 21 November 2024

“I’m Not Explaining Myself Verbally Ever Again”
Filed Under: Respiratory Sovereignty · Verbal Violence · Police Reports as Policy · NHS Misconduct · SWANK London Ltd

๐Ÿ’ฌ Declared from the Lungs, Not the Lips

Dear Kirsty (and the institutional entourage):

“I will not explain things to anyone verbally anymore.”
That is not defiance. It is clinical instruction.
Because what you call a “conversation,” my airway registers as collapse.

๐Ÿ“ต Verbal ≠ Safe

“I always get interrupted or the person doesn’t listen.”
That isn’t dialogue. It’s dismissal.

Verbal communication — when weaponised — becomes an arena for:

  • Ableist performance demands

  • Discrediting the disabled

  • Re-traumatisation in real-time

You demand I perform breathlessness for your legitimacy — then penalise me for gasping.

๐Ÿฅ “It’s weird to bully me when I say my daughter can’t breathe.”

It’s not weird.
It’s structural.
It’s the NHS.

Because I documented her asthma —
And you documented me.

๐Ÿš” “From now on, I make police reports every time.”

Every refusal of care.
Every safeguarding ambush.
Every verbal stunt in fluorescent drag — logged, filed, numbered.

Because what you escalate, I indict.

You make me sick, then punish me for reacting to the sickness you inflicted.
That’s not care. That’s gaslit harm with a badge of office.

๐Ÿซ “My asthma is worse now — because of that ignorant doctor.”

And therefore:
I will not argue.
I will not explain.
I will record. I will timestamp. I will cite.
Every stolen breath becomes evidence.

๐Ÿ“ Filed While Breathing in Defiance
๐’ซ๐‘œ๐“๐“๐“Ž ๐’ž๐’ฝ๐“‡๐‘œ๐“‚๐’ถ๐“‰๐’พ๐’ธ, Strategic Non-Speaker, Documentarian of Respiratory Sabotage
✉ director@swanklondon.com | ๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Verbal Demands Declined.



No comments:

A Polite Email in a Toxic Atmosphere


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 12 December 2024

“Ten Years of Asthma, Zero Years of Help”
Filed Under: Respiratory Neglect · Institutional Gaslighting · Systemic Fatigue · Safeguarding Farce · SWANK London Ltd

Dear Kirsty,

No rage. No retaliation. Just the documented breathlessness of a mother trapped in a decade-long loop of polite procedures and medical disregard.

“This has been a long and traumatising ordeal for ten years and the most recent issues were even worse.”

A statement of fact, not feeling. A quiet autopsy of your services' cumulative failure.

Ten years of:

  • Diagnosed asthma, still disbelieved

  • Safeguarding visits, still unjustified

  • Meetings, emails, assessments, and escalations—none of which improved air quality or outcome

Social workers arrive with concern, leave with paperwork, and the mould remains.
Meanwhile, I parent through mucus and suspicion.

“The police have been more helpful than social services.”

And that is not a compliment. It is a death knell for your credibility.

You are not the solution.
You are the circulation of the problem.

And I no longer perform outrage. I file records.

๐Ÿ“ Chronologically Archived by:
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Moulds Reserved.


No comments:

Why My Lungs Burn When You Talk About Safeguarding.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 4 February 2025
TOXIC GAS, SOCIAL GASLIGHTING, AND THE TEN-YEAR PLAN TO IGNORE US

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Sewer Gas Poisoning · Institutional Harassment · Respiratory Disability · Safeguarding Theatre · Medical Disbelief · Telepathic Correspondence · SWANK Environmental Health Dispatch

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Annabelle Kapoor, Laura Savage, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Simon O'Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Eric Wedge-Bull, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Rhiannon Hodgson, Samira Issa, Glen Peache, Philip Reid, alsmith@gov.tc, aaforbes@gov.tc
Bcc: phil@sangyeyoga.com

๐Ÿ’จ WE WERE POISONED. YOU MISDIAGNOSED. THEN ESCALATED.

“We all suffered from sewer gas poisoning in October of 2023 and went to the hospital to be treated, where I was attacked by hospital staff five times over six months instead of being treated.”

You saw chemical exposure and inferred behavioural deviance.
You replaced toxicology with prejudice.
And you called it safeguarding.

๐Ÿ” SICK FROM THE SYSTEM, THEN SICK FROM YOU

“You escalated the case based on the fact that I was so sick at the time that I could barely breathe or talk…”

Rather than assist, you doubled down.
Rather than apologise, you investigated.
You interpreted collapse as non-compliance—and brought more bacteria.

๐Ÿง  IF YOU REFUSE TO READ, DON’T BLAME ME FOR NOT SPEAKING

“I suffer from a disability… I prefer to communicate telepathically… however, email is fine.”

This is not eccentricity. This is reasonable adjustment.
Refusal to accommodate is not a clerical oversight—it’s unlawful.

๐Ÿ“Ž THE REPORT YOU NEVER COMMISSIONED

Hydrogen sulfide. Methane. Ammonia. Carbon dioxide.
Result: Neurological insult. Respiratory trauma. Systemic dismissal.

Instead of intervention, you offered interrogation.
Instead of empathy, escalation.

Polly Chromatic
Poisoned, prosecuted, pathologised—never pacified.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Toxins Tracked.


No comments:

I Filed the Lawsuit and I Couldn’t Breathe — Everyone Got the Email.


⟡ “I Filed My Lawsuit. They Ignored My Lungs.” ⟡

Polly Chromatic Informs Kirsty Hornal, NHS, Legal Counsel, and RBKC of N1 Claim Filing — Links Ongoing Respiratory Harm to Social Work Conduct

Filed: 24 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-10
๐Ÿ“Ž Download PDF – 2025-02-24_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_N1ClaimFiling_DisabilityImpactStatement.pdf
Summary: Email from Polly Chromatic announcing formal N1 lawsuit filing. Sent to Kirsty Hornal, NHS, and legal teams. Cites exacerbated vocal cord injury and asthma from Hornal’s previous visit.

I. What Happened

On 24 February 2025, Polly Chromatic sent a group email to:

  • Kirsty Hornal (Westminster)

  • Laura Savage (Merali Beedle)

  • Simon O’Meara (Blackfords)

  • Gideon Mpalanyi (RBKC)

  • Philip Reid (NHS)

She stated:

“I’m submitting my lawsuit today. Have a nice week.”
“My vocal cords are still extremely exacerbated from Kirsty’s last visit... I can barely talk and also can’t breathe well.”

She attached the N1 Claim Form, making this a formal timestamped filing announcement.

The email was also forwarded to Harley Street Mental Health, requesting delivery to Dr. Rafiq — confirming clinical documentation of harm.

II. What the Record Establishes

• The N1 claim was served and timestamped to all relevant actors on 24 Feb 2025
• A direct health impact (vocal cord damage, asthma exacerbation) from Kirsty’s presence was documented
• This forms part of the disability timeline and adjustment refusal narrative
• NHS staff were made aware that social work visits were causing harm
• No responsive duty of care was triggered — reinforcing deliberate inaction

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because lawsuits don’t begin with papers — they begin with harm.
Because emailing “I can’t breathe” isn’t a metaphor when it follows safeguarding escalation.
Because the harm and the legal filing were in the same sentence — and the system still refused to adjust.

SWANK logs every filing that came with a body count.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that social work visits can physically injure disabled claimants.
We do not accept that such injuries are irrelevant when disclosed alongside legal action.
We do not accept that this message was unclear.

This wasn’t a declaration of intent. It was a declaration of injury — and SWANK preserved it.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

⟡ Hydrate and Hush: When Voice Loss Meets Institutional Decorum ⟡


⟡ Voice, Vapour, and the Velvet No: Dysphonia Diagnosed but Barely Heard ⟡
Filed: 12 August 2024
Reference: SWANK/SLT/Wood-HarleyENT-2024
๐Ÿ“Ž Download PDF — 2024-08-12_SWANK_HarleyStreetENT_DysphoniaAsthmaReflux_SpeechTherapyReport.pdf

I. When the Voice Fails and the System Merely Listens

This entry records the consultation of a 44-year-old mother, disabled scholar, and litigant whose voice began to erode in the wake of environmental exposure to sewage fumes. The response from Harley Street?

Gentle concern.
Technical language.
And the usual quietus: follow-up in 3–6 weeks.

She could not breathe.
She could not speak.
But she could, apparently, hydrate.

II. Clinical Summary (or: What They Admitted Without Acting)

  • Diagnosis: Muscle tension dysphonia

  • Complications: Asthma, reflux, nasal obstruction, suspected MACS

  • Symptoms: Exhaustion from speech, choking episodes, red chest rash, breathing dysfunction

  • Therapy prescribed: Beach pose breathing and Lax Vox

The body speaks in pathology. The clinic responds in metaphors.

III. Why SWANK Filed This

Because it is not acceptable that a woman with a history of eosinophilic asthma, recurrent infections, and vocal strain induced by environmental exposure receives:

  • A breathing worksheet

  • A hydration reminder

  • And an implied invitation to try mindfulness

This report does not document support.
It documents the institutional elegance of not panicking — even when confronted with medical suffocation.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not believe that a history of sewage inhalation, breathing dysfunction, and chronic illness is remedied by posture.

We reject the quiet clinical tradition of sounding learned while doing nothing urgent.

Let the record show:

  • The voice degraded after toxic exposure

  • The patient was a disabled carer and professional

  • The treatment plan was water, patience, and optimism

This was not multidisciplinary care.
It was polite documentation of physiological collapse.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments: