“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label N1 claim support. Show all posts
Showing posts with label N1 claim support. Show all posts

Respiratory Collapse Was the Outcome. Their Procedure Was the Trigger.


⟡ They Scheduled a Child Protection Meeting While I Was Hospitalised — Then Denied It Happened ⟡

Filed: 18 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/N1-COMPANION/MED-ENDANGERMENT
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-18_SWANK_CompanionLetter_MedicalEndangerment_StateSafeguarding_RBKC_Westminster_N1Support.pdf

I. Respiratory Collapse Was the Outcome. Their Procedure Was the Trigger.

This letter was filed as companion evidence to the N1 claim against RBKC and Westminster, and makes explicit what their correspondence tried to veil:

  • That safeguarding threats were timed to coincide with medical crises

  • That lawful disability adjustments were ignored on file and then punished in policy

  • That being too sick to attend a meeting was reframed as a parenting concern

They didn’t support.
They escalated.
And the archive filed it — word by retaliatory word.

II. What They Knew. When They Leveraged It.

This document outlines:

  • A pattern of fabricated safeguarding urgency following each hospitalisation

  • The exact non-engagement email used to frame absence as “lack of cooperation”

  • NHS records evidencing acute symptoms ignored in scheduling and procedure

  • The institutional strategy: initiate harm, then penalise the victim for experiencing it

This wasn’t coincidence.
It was administrative choreography with life-threatening effects.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because safeguarding is not a weapon.
Because scheduling meetings during known incapacity is not care — it is strategic erasure.
Because failure to medically adjust isn’t just discrimination — it’s state-sponsored endangerment.

Let the record show:

  • The condition was diagnosed

  • The policy was manipulated

  • The parent was harmed

  • And SWANK — filed the pattern, with references and footnotes

This isn’t a letter.
It’s the forensic language of a lawsuit in gestation.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not permit health crises to be used as procedural opportunity.
We do not accept safeguarding as cover for institutional backlash.
We do not redact the tactics of those who turned care into surveillance.

Let the record show:

The risk was medical.
The response was bureaucratic.
The collapse was real.
And SWANK — preserved the evidence of systemic causation.

This isn’t parental non-engagement.
It’s institutional entrapment — published in PDF.




No comments:

Documented Obsessions