“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label UN Submission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UN Submission. Show all posts

This Is the File They Can’t Pretend They Didn’t See.


⟡ SWANK Global Evidence Dispatch ⟡

“The Human Rights Record Has Been Filed. And It Names Them All.”
Filed: 21 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/IHRC/EVIDENCE/2025-05-21
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-21_SWANK_InternationalHumanRights_EvidenceIndex_Simlett.pdf

I. They Thought It Was Just a Complaint. It Was an International Dossier.

In May 2025, SWANK London Ltd. compiled and filed a full-spectrum evidence index for international legal scrutiny— spanning seven years of documented retaliation, disability harm, safeguarding misuse, and medical neglect.

This is not correspondence.
It is a litigation map, formatted for UN rapporteurs, human rights investigators, and foreign tribunals.

Not because we expect their help — but because we refuse the silence of domestic institutions.

II. What the Evidence Index Contains

  • Over 60 filings, complaints, legal notices, and witness statements

  • Pattern analysis of:

    • Disability-based safeguarding abuse

    • Medical endangerment (eosinophilic asthma, dysphonia)

    • Housing inaccessibility and environmental exposure

    • Procedural and racial retaliation by state actors

  • Cross-referenced citations to:

    • The Equality Act 2010

    • The Human Rights Act 1998

    • The UNCRPD, UNCRC, and ECHR

This isn’t advocacy.
This is indictment.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because internal complaints disappear.
Because ombudsman inboxes delay.
Because the law is real — but domestic enforcement is performative.

We did not file this for reply.
We filed this to ensure that:

If any international body examines the UK’s treatment of disabled whistleblowers,
our archive will already be on their desk.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We are not waiting for the UK to admit wrongdoing.
We are recording its refusal — in global jurisdictional time.

Let the record show:

The evidence exists.
The links are real.
The names are preserved.
And now, the international record is activated — because we filed it.

This is not escalation.
It is expectation recalibrated.
We’ve left the jurisdiction. And brought the documents with us.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

When Safeguarding Becomes Strategy: A Shadow Report on Disabled Motherhood Under Siege in the UK


👑 SHADOW REPORT SUBMISSION

Filed with Reluctant Majesty to the United Nations Special Rapporteurs
on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
and on Violence Against Women and Girls

Submitted by:
Miss Polly Chromatic
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
📧 complaints@swankarchive.com
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
🗓 June 2025
📂 Submission Type: Public
⚖ Legal Status: Direct witness, targeted mother, and involuntary expert in bureaucratic brutality

🎓 Statement of Purpose

This Shadow Report is submitted not merely in protest, but in documentation of a truth so banal in its cruelty it could only be authored by modern governance.

It addresses the United Kingdom’s systematic breach of its obligations under:

  • The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)

  • The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)

  • The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)

This is not a plea. It is a transcribed refusal to be erased, silenced, or procedurally harassed under the guise of “support.”

🖋 Executive Summary

I am a disabled woman and mother of four disabled children, all thriving despite the full, clumsy weight of British institutions attempting otherwise.

I was denied care, then punished for complaining.
I asked for written communication; I was given false referrals.
I submitted legal filings; I received safeguarding visits.
I parented lawfully; they called it suspicious.
I educated successfully; they called it isolating.

This submission is not a tale of neglect — it is a museum of precision, chronicling exactly how state systems convert disability and motherhood into targets of suspicion.

📉 Key Violations

1. Refusal of Reasonable Adjustments
Written-only communication, clinically mandated, legally protected — systematically denied. Bureaucrats prefer a voice they can interrupt.

2. Retaliatory Safeguarding Interference
Every formal complaint filed was met with escalated intrusion. In Britain, it seems, dissent is a safeguarding risk.

3. Medical Negligence by Design
Asthma erased. Records rewritten. Health needs editorialised to suit the social narrative.

4. Intersectional Stereotyping
A disabled white woman with Black children? Suspicion was preloaded. Gender and race weaponised via bureaucracy.

5. Silencing by Process
I was not just denied services. I was denied the right to document. Denied the right to refuse. Denied the right to speak on my terms.

🕰 Chronology of Orchestrated Collapse

  • 2015 — Survived domestic violence in Turks & Caicos. Fled. Reported. Ignored.

  • 2016 — Harassed by Camden social workers. Fled again.

  • 2021 — Returned to London for medical crisis. Diagnosed with eosinophilic asthma.

  • 2023–24 — Disability accommodations refused. Legal filings punished.

  • Feb 2024 — False safeguarding referral while struggling to breathe.

  • 2024 — Filed: N1, N16A, N461. Complaints to NHS, GMC, LGSCO, ICO.

  • Apr–May 2025 — Police reports filed. EHRC complaint submitted.

  • June 2025 — Shadow Report submitted to the UN.

📚 Legal Instruments Cross-Invoked

CRPD
• Article 5 – Non-discrimination
• Article 9 – Accessibility
• Article 13 – Access to justice
• Article 16 – Protection from exploitation and abuse
• Article 21 – Freedom of expression
• Article 25 – Health

CEDAW
• Article 2 – State discrimination
• Article 5 – Gender stereotypes
• Article 12 – Access to healthcare
• Article 15 – Legal capacity

CRC
• Article 2 – Non-discrimination
• Article 3 – Best interests of the child
• Article 12 – Child voice and participation
• Article 24 – Right to health

📎 Annexes and Exhibits Available Upon Request

  • A. Complaint Letters and Legal Filings — NHS, EHRC, GMC, ICO, LGSCO

  • B. Civil and Judicial Documents — N1, N16A, N461

  • C. Medical Documentation — Diagnoses, GP letters, safeguarding distortion

  • D. SWANK Public Archive — www.swanklondon.com

📢 Requested UN Action

  1. Formal acknowledgement of UK non-compliance with disability and gender rights frameworks

  2. UN inquiry into the weaponisation of safeguarding and social care against disabled mothers

  3. Statement on the right of disabled litigants to communicate on paper, not performance

  4. Protection of those who write instead of weep

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
📧 complaints@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy


No comments:

Documented Obsessions