“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label PTSD retraumatisation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PTSD retraumatisation. Show all posts

A Safeguarding Excuse. A Learning Day Destroyed.


⟡ SWANK Archive Record ⟡

“The Visit Was the Violation”
Filed: 3 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/MET/2025-06-03
📎 Download PDF: 2025-06-03_SWANK_Complaint_DisabilityBreach_MetPolice_HomeVisit.pdf

I. Scene: Disability Adjustment, Ignored

On the morning of 3 June 2025, two officers from the Metropolitan Police attended the private residence of our Director — a disabled mother recovering from institutional trauma — without invitation, urgency, or lawful cause.

They disregarded:

  • A clearly posted front-door adjustment sign:

    Disability Adjustment: Written Communication Only – Do Not Knock.

  • A formal communication adjustment already on police file

  • Three diagnosed conditions: Eosinophilic Asthma, muscle tension dysphonia, and PTSD

The consequences were swift and violent:
❐ Physiological collapse
❐ PTSD resurgence
❐ Educational interruption for legally homeschooled children

There was no emergency. There was no safeguarding trigger.
There was only power — misused.

II. Legal Protections Breached, With Contempt

The conduct in question constitutes violations under:

  • Equality Act 2010
    Section 20: Reasonable Adjustments Ignored
    Section 21: Disability-Linked Discrimination

  • Human Rights Act 1998
    Article 8: Respect for Private and Family Life

The attending officers’ failure to heed well-documented, visible medical instructions is not a procedural lapse.
It is a strategic humiliation masquerading as state presence.

III. Remedies Formally Demanded

This complaint — now officially lodged with both the Metropolitan Police Professional Standards Department and the IOPC — demands the following:

  1. A written apology acknowledging legal breach

  2. Cessation of all in-person police visits without prior written consent

  3. Immediate review of internal systems for disability adjustment flagging

  4. Referral to IOPC for full misconduct investigation

This incident has been formally appended to a live civil N1 claim concerning state retaliation and disability discrimination.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not negotiate the right to be left alone.

To ignore a written-only medical adjustment is not just disrespectful. It is a state-authored health hazard.

This is not a misunderstanding.
It is the bureaucratic fantasy that “safeguarding” gives one license to disregard health, home, and humanity.

Noted. Logged. Filed in velvet.


⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Documented Obsessions