“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label privacy violation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label privacy violation. Show all posts

No Room for Intrusion: My Hotel Door Is Not Your Jurisdiction.



⟡ SWANK Safety Archive: Public Space Misconduct Series ⟡

“This Wasn’t Hospitality. It Was Trespass in Uniform.”
Filed: 6 December 2023
Reference: SWANK/HOTEL/SECURITY-HARASSMENT/HOLIDAYINN-2023
📎 Download PDF – 2023-12-06_SWANK_HolidayInn_SecurityHarassment_EmailComplaint_Simlett_LegalEvidence.pdf


I. I Paid for Privacy. I Received Surveillance.

On 6 December 2023, a Holiday Inn security guard attempted to knock on the hotel room door of a disabled woman travelling alone — at midnight.

Not once.
Twice.
Without cause. Without invitation. Without apology.

The reason? None given.
The effect? Intimidation — dressed in corporate polyester and institutional smirk.

This wasn’t a safety check.
This was harassment with a staff badge.


II. What the Email Documents

  • real-time, written warning to management from the guest

  • A legally literate refusal:

    “Do not ever knock on my hotel room door at 12am again or I will call the police.”

  • The line between paid lodging and state-adjacent intrusion, crossed without hesitation

  • The gendered entitlement of hotel security: assuming access, invoking silence, expecting no reply

This is not about courtesy.
It is about jurisdiction over one’s own door.


III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because they always say:

“It was just a knock.”
“We were only doing our job.”
“She overreacted.”

And yet:

  • They would not knock on a man’s door.

  • They would not do it twice.

  • And they would not have met a line as clear as this one.

We filed it because:

  • The door was paid for.

  • The boundary was physical.

  • And the response was legally immediate.

This is not about discomfort.
It is about legal territory — and the architecture of refusal.


IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not grant informal access to institutional uniforms.
We do not accept midnight knocks as “routine.”
We do not allow hospitality to become surveillance with tea kettles.

Let the record show:

The door was knocked.
The warning was written.
The police were named.
And the guest was not intimidated — she was archived.

This was not service.
This was trespass with corporate backing.
And now, it is filed in the only archive that bites back.


⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.



“This is Part of the Process” Is Not an Excuse for Harassment

 🚪 SWANK Dispatch: Immigration Banged on the Side of My House, Then Sat in a Field and Took Photos

🗓️ 26 August 2021

Filed Under: immigration misconduct, privacy breach, unannounced visit, family disruption, government intimidation, surveillance abuse, home education interference, digital class disruption, administrative coercion, TCI overreach


“I was in class.
My kids were studying.
And your officers were banging on the side of my house like debt collectors
and photographing my house like it was a crime scene.”

— A Mother Who Does Everything at Home and Was Still Not Left Alone


In this sharp letter to William L. Mills, Director of Registration and Citizenship in the Turks and Caicos IslandsPolly Chromatic makes a formal protest against an unannounced and invasive immigration visit on the morning of 26 August 2021.


🧾 I. What Happened

  • Immigration officials arrived without notice

  • They began banging on the side of the house, calling her phone repeatedly

  • She was in the middle of an online university class and could not answer

  • After leaving, they sat in the field across the street photographing her house

  • Her husband was told: “This is part of the process”

  • But during their previous interview, they were told “the process was complete”


🏡 II. Why It Matters

  • Polly works, studies, teaches, and heals entirely from home

  • Her family life is tightly structured around education, wellness, and stability

  • This incident not only breached personal privacy, but disrupted educationviolated boundaries, and reinstated fear under the guise of bureaucratic process


✉️ III. What She Asked For

  • That future visits be by appointment only

  • That immigration staff respect private and family life

  • That she not be treated as if her home is a surveillance target


SWANK Summary:

When a mother says, “You’re welcome here — just ask,”
and your staff chooses banging, calling, and stalking instead,
you’ve exited the realm of immigration
and entered the terrain of intimidation.



Documented Obsessions