⟡ “I’m Not Responding Since No One Responded to Me for a Year” ⟡
The Email That Was Forwarded — and the Evidence That Wasn’t
Filed: 10 January 2025
Reference: SWANK/WESTMINSTER/EMAIL-08
📎 Download PDF – 2025-01-10_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_AttachmentFailure_TelecomNeglectEvidence.pdf
Forwarded email documenting a missed visit, declared withdrawal of engagement, and an implied attachment failure — sent to legal, medical, and local authority contacts.
I. What Happened
On 9 January 2025, Polly Chromatic forwarded her “No show” message regarding Kirsty Hornal to solicitor Laura Savage, GP Philip Reid, and others. The message reiterated her exhaustion: “I’m not responding to emails since no one responded to mine for a full year.”
The attachment, implied in the subject and message context, appears to have failed — either technically or procedurally. The intended telecom evidence never arrived.
This document logs not just the failed visit, but the administrative void that followed: failed responses, failed attachments, failed concern.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
Reiterated withdrawal of consent following extended neglect
Failed submission of supporting telecom documentation
Procedural vacuum — when even evidence delivery is compromised
Silence met with further administrative opacity
Institutional patterns where emotional exhaustion becomes functional disengagement
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because not all silences are accidental — and not all technical failures are meaningless.
This file marks a moment where truth was attempted, again — and again ignored or lost. Whether through email failure or institutional avoidance, the result was the same: a record unacknowledged, a complaint unmet, and a disabled mother forced to repeat herself across multiple jurisdictions just to say she was tired.
SWANK logs it because in systems like these, even forwarding an email becomes an act of resistance.
IV. SWANK’s Position
This was not a tech glitch. It was a structural echo.
We do not accept that medical exhaustion must be sent multiple times to be acknowledged.
We do not accept that missing attachments erase institutional duty.
We will document every attempt to be heard — even when it didn’t land.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.