⟡ “Adjustment Requested. Retaliation Received.” ⟡
A complete evidentiary annex submitted in legal proceedings documenting Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust’s refusal to implement lawful disability adjustments for Polly Chromatic and her children.
Filed: 5 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/GSTT/ADA-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-05_SWANK_GSTT_DisabilityAdjustmentAnnex_FailureToAccommodate.pdf
Includes correspondence, legal declarations, policy references, and clinical context proving discriminatory denial of medical adjustments.
I. What Happened
Polly Chromatic formally requested reasonable adjustments from GSTT due to:
Severe eosinophilic asthma
Muscle dysphonia and verbal communication barriers
PTSD from prior medical trauma
Sole caregiving for four disabled U.S. citizen children
Despite repeated notices, the Trust refused to implement even basic accommodations — instead escalating institutional surveillance and retaliation.
II. What the Record Establishes
That GSTT was provided with medical records, legal rights citations, and clinical justification
That multiple written requests for adjustments were ignored or denied
That denial of care was tied to Polly Chromatic’s lawful resistance and complaint activity
That these failures led to further medical harm and increased safeguarding pressure
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because the NHS is not exempt from the Equality Act.
Because disability rights aren’t suggestions —
they’re statutory obligations.
Because retaliation disguised as “clinical policy” is still retaliation.
IV. Violations
Equality Act 2010: Failure to make reasonable adjustments
Human Rights Act: Violation of right to healthcare and bodily autonomy
GMC Code of Practice breaches by participating clinicians
Retaliatory denial of care in response to complaints and documentation
Disability discrimination under UK and international law
V. SWANK’s Position
This annex was submitted to show the law was clear.
The request was legal. The need was medical. The refusal was ideological.
Now, the public has the file the NHS tried to ignore.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.