🩺 “OXYGEN? NO THANK YOU.”
The Medical Mismanagement Timeline That Launched a Safeguarding Fiction
⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Filed Date: 11 July 2025
Reference Code: SWK-AUD-0711-MED-RESPCOLL
Filename: 2025-07-11_Audit_MedicalNeglect_RespiratoryCollapse_Timeline.pdf
Summary: The safeguarding claim didn’t begin with neglect — it began with oxygen deprivation and NHS suspicion theatre.
I. What Happened
Before a single social worker rang the doorbell. Before the police ambush. Before the Emergency Protection Order. There was this: a respiratory collapse, a 44% oxygen reading, and a series of non-treatment events masquerading as clinical concern.
Between November 2023 and April 2024, Polly Chromatic presented to four different hospitals in distress. She was:
Not treated for asthma.
Misread as intoxicated.
Falsely accused of racial aggression by a patient who assaulted her.
Questioned about her parenting while unable to breathe.
This is not safeguarding. This is sabotage — committed in latex gloves.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
Let’s be clear:
There was no initial “risk.” There was hypoxia, then hysteria — all of it institutional.
Each event on this timeline shows the system:
Failing to understand Eosinophilic Asthma
Blaming the patient for her own medical crisis
Escalating to Local Authority involvement without a single moment of diagnostic clarity
And yet, this timeline became the foundation for the fiction that this mother was unfit. A fiction that spread through safeguarding teams like the respiratory infections they never treated.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because it is no longer enough to say, “There was no threshold.”
Now we must say: “There was a woman whose oxygen was at 44% and nobody helped her.”
Because the removal of four children didn’t begin with any lawful intervention.
It began with a hospital staff member misreading asthma for intoxication, and every agency thereafter choosing to believe the fiction.
This is not “multi-agency safeguarding.”
This is multi-agency defamation — with prescription pads.
IV. Violations
ECHR Article 3: Denial of oxygen is not care. It is cruelty.
ECHR Article 8: The safeguarding referral destroyed family life on medically disproven grounds.
Children Act 1989: Used not to protect, but to persecute.
NHS Constitution: Breached. Repeatedly. And with alarming confidence.
V. SWANK’s Position
Every safeguarding act since November 2023 is poisoned by this origin point.
The Local Authority did not identify a risk — they inherited one that never existed.
And the cost?
A mother’s health. Four children’s home.
All because someone couldn’t read an oximeter.
Filed without deletion.
Logged without revision.
Every breath counted.
Except by the people paid to count them.
Polly Chromatic
Founder, SWANK London Ltd.
www.swanklondon.com
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.