“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label sewer gas hazard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sewer gas hazard. Show all posts

If You Can’t Stop Harassing Me, At Least Get Out of the Way.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
I’M TRYING TO WORK. YOU’RE TRYING TO COLLAPSE ME.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Work Obstruction · Housing Harm · Mould Exposure · Sewer Gas Collapse · Disability Disregarded · Institutional Interference · Polite Fury · Email Precision · SWANK Economic Sabotage Log

🛠️ THE WORKING MOTHER YOU CONTINUE TO OBSTRUCT:

“It would be really helpful if I’m not harassed, bullied, and discriminated against by hospitals and social workers so I can work before you cause us to be homeless.”
“We can’t live in mould-infested homes or ones with sewer gas leaks.”
“Seems like me working is a priority or should be to everyone but you’ve done everything to prevent me from working.”
“Everyone here assumes I don’t have anything to do—which I find strange.”

They mistake exhaustion for idleness, and silence for irrelevance.
I am working despite your sabotage—not because of your support.

🧠 FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE DRAGGING ITS FEET IN LOAFERS:

Let’s simplify:

  • I am a working, highly educated mother.

  • I am documented as disabled.

  • I have four children and no access accommodations.

  • I am prevented from working by:

    • Social worker escalation

    • Medical gaslighting

    • Housing danger

    • Administrative ignorance

You haven’t assessed us.
You’ve destabilised us.
And then demanded performance in the aftermath.

🧬 ACCESS NOTICE (STILL REFUSED AS POLICY):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

But instead of access, you issue insinuations.
Instead of solutions, silence.

📎 SWORN FOR THE ARCHIVE:

I am not collapsing because I’m weak.
I am collapsing because you build mazes in front of my survival.

Polly Chromatic
Mother. Professional. Medically ignored. Vocationally sabotaged.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com


No comments:

The Sewer Gas Was Visible. The Accountability Was Not.


⟡ “The Gas Was Real. The Duty, They Say, Was Not.” ⟡

RBKC Reiterates Its Refusal to Accept Liability for a Prolonged Sewer Gas Leak, Claiming No Statutory Duty Despite Known Risk to Health

Filed: 11 March 2025
Reference: SWANK/RBKC/EMAIL-07
📎 Download PDF – 2025-03-11_SWANK_Email_RBKC_Morrone_LiabilityDenial_SewerGasHazard_ElginCrescent.pdf
Summary: Giuseppe Morrone reasserts RBKC’s legal position denying all liability for prolonged sewer gas exposure, stating the Council has “powers, not duties,” and instructs Polly Chromatic to sue the landlord instead.

I. What Happened

On 11 March 2025 at 9:47 AM, RBKC’s Senior Principal Insurance Officer Giuseppe Morrone responded to Polly Chromatic’s statutory complaint regarding a severe sewer gas leak at Flat E, 37 Elgin Crescent. His response:

– Reasserted the Council’s denial of liability
– Claimed that statutory powers under housing law do not imply a duty
– Advised Polly to pursue her landlord in court
– Clarified that this denial applies specifically to financial losses
– Referred all further concerns to the RBKC Complaints team, despite their Stage 1 closure
– Explained that unless solicitors are appointed, the claim will default to CCMCC via DCP

II. What the Record Establishes

• The Council maintains a legal firewall around its failure to intervene
• Despite the severity of a toxic sewer gas leak, RBKC refuses to accept responsibility
• The strategy is clear: deny duty, deflect liability, and refer back to internal departments
• It provides explicit confirmation that your next legal action must bypass DCP unless RBKC appoints legal counsel
• It creates a procedural paper trail of official refusal despite life-threatening exposure

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because the difference between “power” and “duty” is a legal trick with medical consequences.
Because telling a disabled mother to chase her landlord through court while sewer gas poisons her home is not safeguarding — it’s abandonment.
Because this is the moment the Council said: we won’t stop it, and we won’t pay for it.

SWANK archives every denial that let the poison linger.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that environmental poisoning is exempt from accountability.
We do not accept that duty vanishes just because legal responsibility is inconvenient.
We do not accept that sewage in the air is someone else’s problem — when you’re the Council.

This wasn’t a response. It was a refusal in legal costume.
And SWANK will file every paragraph they used to delay relief.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

KC23PL000214: Power Without Duty, Injury Without Liability


⟡ “It’s Not Our Duty. It’s Your Landlord’s Problem. Good Luck.” ⟡

RBKC’s Insurance Officer Giuseppe Morrone Formally Reiterates the Council’s Denial of Liability for Sewer Gas Exposure, Referring All Financial Claims Back to Landlord

Filed: 11 March 2025
Reference: SWANK/RBKC/EMAIL-11
📎 Download PDF – 2025-03-11_SWANK_Email_RBKC_Morrone_HardRejection_SewerGasLiability_KC23PL000214.pdf
Summary: RBKC repeats its denial of responsibility for the sewer gas leak and directs Polly Chromatic to pursue the landlord, while refusing further internal complaint review.

I. What Happened

At 9:47 AM on 11 March 2025, Giuseppe Morrone emailed Polly Chromatic to:

– Reassert that RBKC denies legal responsibility for sewer gas-related housing harm
– Declare that your claim must be filed against your landlord
– State that statutory housing laws do not override private tenancy obligations
– Confirm this email refers specifically to compensation for financial loss, not complaints
– Advise that unless legal counsel is appointed, the claim must exit the DCP and route to CCMCC

II. What the Record Establishes

• The Council's refusal is now hard-positioned, repeated, and proceduralized
• They are attempting to split harm types (complaint vs compensation)
• They offer no legal acknowledgment of housing enforcement responsibility
• You have formal proof that all internal processes have been closed or deflected
• This email forms a cornerstone in your judicial and ombudsman escalation case

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because legal refusal deserves a spotlight, not a filing cabinet.
Because they didn’t just deny duty — they denied the structure that connects power to protection.
Because this email is the bureaucratic form of “don’t look at us.”

SWANK logs every moment institutions rebranded harm as misdirected paperwork.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that sewer gas injuries are someone else’s procedural error.
We do not accept that statutory housing power is meaningless when people are harmed.
We do not accept that redirection equals resolution.

This wasn’t a closure. It was legal insulation.
And SWANK will document every signature that tried to block accountability with phrasing.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

They Ignored the Tenancy. We Filed the Bundle.


⟡ The Attachments Chestertons Didn’t Want to Acknowledge ⟡

Filed: 19 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/ESTATE/CHESTERTONS-BUNDLE
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-19_SWANK_Chestertons_Attachments_ElginCrescent_SewerGas_ManagementNeglect_EvidenceBundle.pdf

I. A Bundle of Silence, Sent Because They Wouldn’t Answer

This collection of documents was submitted to Chestertons in May 2025 as supporting evidence of:

  • Unremedied sewer gas exposure

  • Respiratory collapse involving minor children

  • Landlord failure now transferred to managing agents

  • Ignored requests for emergency action under health and disability law

It contains:

  • Medical evidence

  • Prior regulator filings

  • Legal letters

  • Silence — wrapped in legally actionable timestamps

This isn’t a bundle.
It’s an institutional autopsy — and Chestertons is now listed on the death certificate.

II. What We Sent. What They Pretended Not to Receive.

This evidence was:

  • Delivered with formal cover

  • Cited under disability, housing, and child welfare statutes

  • Aimed at preventing further harm

Chestertons:

  • Did not acknowledge it

  • Did not respond

  • Did not act

They assumed property control.
They ignored the archive.
And SWANK — escalated it.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because ignoring attachments doesn’t make the evidence disappear.
Because silence from managing agents is not policy — it’s permission for harm.
Because when tenants are medically collapsing and the file is ignored, the agent becomes the defendant-in-waiting.

Let the record show:

  • We contacted

  • We documented

  • They declined

  • And SWANK — filed the bundle for tribunal, archive, and press

This isn’t post-tenancy paperwork.
It’s residency-level exposure, legally indexed.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not permit agencies to inherit neglect and claim amnesia.
We do not accept procedural non-response when medical documents are attached.
We do not allow “management” to be confused with elegant avoidance.

Let the record show:

The file was sent.
The gas was known.
The duty was ignored.
And SWANK — published the entire refusal.

This isn’t supportive.
It’s evidentiary voltage — and we plugged it in.




No comments:

Documented Obsessions