“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label administrative failure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label administrative failure. Show all posts

Respiratory Distress Isn’t a Reason to Deny Documentation

 ๐Ÿ“ SWANK Dispatch: I Was Too Sick to Stand — But Had to Chase My Own Police Report

๐Ÿ—“️ 20 October 2021

Filed Under: police neglect, asthma crisis, medical discrimination, record access obstruction, procedural cruelty, Grand Turk misconduct, emergency documentation, health crisis retaliation, institutional indifference, safeguarding aftermath


“I couldn’t breathe.
I was discharged early from hospital.
And still I had to walk back and forth across town
to beg for a report about the night that nearly killed me.”

— A Mother With a Life-Threatening Illness and a Folder Full of Excuses


In this letter exchange between Polly Chromatic and Acting Assistant Superintendent Drexel Porter, we witness the physical and procedural toll placed on a mother recovering from a near-fatal asthma attack—who simply asked for a copy of the police report related to the asthma attack emergency at her home on 14 October 2021. Why was a police report made for an asthma attack?


๐Ÿงพ I. What She Documented

  • She was still very ill, struggling to breathe

  • She had already visited the police station twice, only to be given the wrong email address

  • She attempted to email Inspector Porter using what was provided, but it bounced

  • She found the correct email herself

  • She arranged a third visit to the station, even though she could barely function physically


๐Ÿซ II. What This Letter Exposes

  • Bureaucratic carelessness in a time of medical crisis

  • No proactive assistance from officers at the Grand Turk station

  • A systemic culture of misdirection and blame-shifting, where the onus of correction falls on the ill and traumatised

  • A complete lack of trauma-informed care from officers involved in a safeguarding-related incident


๐Ÿงฏ III. SWANK Commentary

This isn’t just about a report.

It’s about a woman who survived a respiratory collapse, only to be expected to perform the administrative follow-up that others should have managed.

She didn’t just have to save her own life.
She had to chase the paperwork that explained why it was nearly taken.



“Please Email Me a Letter” — Said 27 Times, Ignored Every One

 ๐Ÿ“š SWANK Dispatch: Exhibit A — The Facebook Record That Should Have Been a Formal Letter

๐Ÿ—“️ 7 August 2020

Filed Under: homeschool obstruction, evidence of compliance, social work escalation, educational gatekeeping, digital documentation, policy evasion, truancy threats, legal overreach


“The record was digital, the neglect was institutional.”
— A Mother With a Screenshot and a Syllabus

In this final escalation to Edgar Howell, Director of Education, Polly Chromatic didn’t just explain the past three years — she documented them. With timestamps. Screenshots. Email threads. And an unassailable transcript of evidence pulled directly from Facebook Messenger, lovingly titled Exhibit A.

What she revealed was not a story.
It was a bureaucratic slow-burn:
Approval dangled.
Letters promised.
Deadlines missed.
Children threatened.


๐Ÿงพ I. The Timeline Is Not Alleged. It’s Archived.

• 15 June 2017 – Initial message to Mark Garland via Facebook
• 26 June 2017 – In-person meeting at 3pm in Grand Turk
• 4 September 2017 – Mark finally requests her curriculum
• 10+ separate written requests asking for written homeschool confirmation
• Dozens of follow-up calls, messages, and apologies for non-response
• Multiple truancy threats, including from the truancy officer (Mr Kennedy)
• Zero formal letters received

All while she followed the UK curriculum and complied with every informal instruction.


๐Ÿ“‰ II. Compliance Was Never the Problem — Communication Was

Polly:

“I am happy to adhere to whatever curriculum you want me to follow but I need to know what that is.”

Instead of clarity, she received:
• Vague emails
• Delayed replies
• Repetitive instructions
• And most devastatingly — continued harassment from the Department of Social Development for lack of a letter that had been promised but never sent.


๐Ÿง  III. Digital Evidence vs Institutional Amnesia

Mark Garland:

“I will email you this evening.”
27 times — Noelle followed up.

What she got:
✓ Approval in conversation
✓ Repeated verbal acknowledgements
✗ No formal protection from truancy accusations
✗ No shielding from social work threats


๐Ÿ“Œ Final Plea:

“Please, I am willing to do whatever is necessary to resolve this matter cooperatively.”

But cooperation is only possible when the institution holds up its end — and responds, formally, in writing, as promised.

SWANK has the receipts.
Exhibit A, archived.



The Thirteenth Day of Silence — A Lesson in Bureaucratic Contempt

 ๐Ÿ“ญ SWANK Dispatch: Still Waiting for the Letter That Was Promised a Week Ago

๐Ÿ—“️ 3 August 2020

Filed Under: broken promises, social work negligence, ignored timelines, communication failure, administrative delay, institutional disrespect, unfulfilled duties, child welfare hypocrisy


“A week, you said. It’s been thirteen days.”
— A Mother Counting Silence as Evidence

Dearest Viewer of Dysfunctional Timelines,

On 20 July 2020Ashley Adams-Forbes, Deputy Director of the Department of Social Development, wrote the following words to Noelle Bonneannรฉe:

“Please give me a week to provide you with an official letter.”

Noelle, as ever, was generous in patience — but today, on 3 August 2020, she followed up. Not with anger. With precision.


๐Ÿ“… I. What Was Promised

A letter.
An official response.
Reports regarding her children’s ongoing cases.
A formal engagement with a detailed timeline she herself had compiled — graciously, professionally.


๐Ÿ“ญ II. What Was Delivered

Nothing.
Thirteen days of silence.
Thirteen days in which Ashley Adams-Forbes simply did not honour her own commitment.

And this from an office allegedly devoted to the well-being of children.


๐Ÿ“Œ III. What the Silence Says

When a government department asks for a week and delivers nothing in thirteen days, it is not a delay.
It is a message.

And the message is this:
We do not take your concerns seriously.
We do not believe we are accountable to you.
We do not care that you are still waiting.


๐Ÿ–‹️ Final Note from Noelle:

“I want my concerns to be taken seriously; however, my concerns seem to be continuously ignored.”

SWANK has taken note.
The archive remembers what they hoped to forget.



Documented Obsessions