“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Referral Repetition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Referral Repetition. Show all posts

I’m Not a Crisis. I’m a Mother. Now Leave Us Alone.

 πŸ–‹️ SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

YOU NEED TO GET A GRIP.


Filed Under: Referral Repetition, Legal Threat Ignored, NHS Collusion, Harassment-as-Procedure, Disabled Mother Stalked, SWANK Documentation


πŸ“Ž SUBJECT: Another Attempt to Manufacture Urgency

Author of Bureaucratic Fiction: Samira Issa
Persistent Co-star: Eric Wedge-Bull
Victim of Systemic Email Harassment: Polly Chromatic

“You need to really get a grip and stop bothering me and my children.”
— Polly, delivering both truth and conclusion.

That is the only sentence in this entire exchange worth remembering.


⚖️ THE CONTEXT YOU REFUSE TO ABSORB:

  • The hospital referral was dated and retaliatory.

  • The “concern” was already addressed.

  • The facts remain static.

  • Medical limitations are documented.

  • The response has not changed.

Yet you wrote:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

To whom, Samira?
To the file? To your compliance quota?
Because it certainly isn’t to the mother who cannot breathe, has refused, and already retained legal counsel.


⛔ THE OFFICIAL POSITION:

  • No phone calls.

  • No in-person meetings.

  • No fabricated urgency.

  • No further participation.


🧠 YOU ARE NOT ACTING ON A REFERRAL.

YOU ARE ACTING ON OBSESSION.

There is no safeguarding action here.
There is no fresh information.
There is no legal footing.

What you are doing is clinging to the echo of a case that never was.


✍️ FROM THE SWANK DESK:

When a mother tells you she has hired a solicitor, cannot speak, and is being medically harmed by your continued contact, and you persist—

That’s no longer contact. That’s litigation bait.


Polly Chromatic
Still not in crisis. Still not available for manufactured concern.
πŸ“§ director@swanklondon.com


Labels: snobby, serious, RBKC harassment, referral recycling, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, NHS collusion, disability ignored, medically silenced, mother refusal, lawful boundary, legal escalation imminent

Bothering Mothers Is Not a Safeguarding Plan.

 πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

YOU NEED TO GET A GRIP.

Filed Under: Referral Repetition, NHS Collusion, Written Refusal Ignored, Disability Harassment, Legal Threats Incoming, Social Worker Obsession


πŸ“Ž SUBJECT: Same Referral. Same Response. Different Mood.

Instigated by: Samira Issa
Still Lurking in the CC: Eric Wedge-Bull
Response Delivered: With finality and elegance.


“You need to really get a grip and stop bothering me and my children.”
“Goodbye.”

A five-star farewell.
Concise. Indisputable. Sublime.


🧾 Yet Again, a Quick Recap:

  • The incident: 2 January 2024

  • The hospital: Chelsea & Westminster (again)

  • The referral: Based on known, documented, fully-addressed matters

  • The response: Written. Explicit. Repeated.

  • The conditions: Asthma. Panic disorder. Medically exempt from verbal contact.

And still, Samira writes:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

To whom?
To you, perhaps. Not to the mother.
Certainly not to the law.


πŸ“΅ YOU WERE ALREADY TOLD:

  • No verbal meetings

  • No new information

  • No legal basis for further inquiry

  • Solicitor already instructed

  • Referral already answered

But here you are — again — staging another episode of unnecessary inquiry dressed in synthetic concern.


🧠 THIS IS NOT PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT.

THIS IS COERCIVE FIXATION.

A social worker's inability to tolerate boundaries does not constitute grounds for escalation.
And "referral fatigue" is not a justification for ignoring medical documentation.


πŸ‘️ THE REALITY:

You are no longer safeguarding.
You are surveilling.
You are stalking through policy, hoping to fabricate a case by sheer repetition.
You are abusing process to override refusal.


Noelle Meline
No longer participating in safeguarding theatre.
πŸ“© complaints@swankarchive.com


Labels: snobby, serious, referral fatigue, safeguarding fraud, NHS collusion, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, mother refusal, legal boundaries breached, medically silenced, RBKC misconduct, SWANK documentation archive, harassment by policy

When You Refuse to Read, I Refuse to Respond.

 πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

CALL A LAWYER. I’M BUSY RAISING CHILDREN.

Filed Under: Referral Repetition, Disability Disregard, Time Theft, Written Refusal, Motherhood Under Siege, RBKC Redundancy


πŸ“Ž SUBJECT: Another Email About the Exact Same Incident

From: Samira Issa
To: A mother already harassed, insulted, and documented.
CC: Eric Wedge-Bull (chief archivist of outdated referrals)


Let’s review the only reply this email deserved:

“I am spending time with my kids. I do not want to waste my time with you. Call a lawyer.”

Read that again. Then frame it.


πŸ“š CONTEXT RECAP:

  • Incident in question: 2 January 2024

  • Referral already addressed.

  • Medical conditions already explained.

  • Legal representation already engaged.

  • Communication boundaries already written.

And still:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

For whom, exactly?

Certainly not the asthmatic mother with documented PTSD and no obligation to reenact a safeguarding pantomime for your inbox.


🧠 THIS IS NOT SAFEGUARDING.

THIS IS EMAIL-BASED CONTROL.

A demand disguised as concern.
A loop disguised as support.
A system designed to monitor the mother, not protect the child.


⛔ NO IS A COMPLETE SENTENCE.

Nothing new has happened.
There is no safeguarding issue.
There is no court instruction.
There is no consent to speak.

There is only a mother with a calendar full of homeschooling, medical advocacy, and breathing.
Not begging.


Noelle Meline
Refusing participation in scripted concern since 2023.
πŸ“© complaints@swankarchive.com


Labels: snobby, serious, written refusal, RBKC harassment, safeguarding theatre, mother not attending, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, referral recycling, NHS-to-social-work pipeline, no consent given, court not consulted, sovereign parenting

Documented Obsessions