“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label GMC evidence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GMC evidence. Show all posts

What the NHS Missed — Filed, Bound, and Worth £23 Million


⟡ The Bundle They Pretended Not to Read ⟡

Filed: 1 March 2025
Reference: SWANK/GMC/ATTACHMENTS-BUNDLE
📎 Download PDF — 2025-03-01_SWANK_GMC_AttachmentsBundle_StThomas_Chelsea_DisabilityNeglect_SafeguardingEvidence_£23MClaim.pdf

I. What the NHS Missed — Filed, Bound, and Worth £23 Million

This supporting bundle accompanies the formal complaint submitted to the General Medical Council against:

  • Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust

  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

The documents within:

  • Confirm written disability adjustments issued and then ignored

  • Detail harm caused by denied treatment, forced verbal demands, and retaliatory escalation

  • Show medical events misrepresented — and then used against the patient

  • Evidence systemic failure not as mistake, but as coordinated indifference

They didn’t lose the paperwork.
They read it — and acted against it.

II. What Was Sent. What They Pretended Wasn’t There.

Included in the bundle:

  • Clinical diagnoses supporting written-only contact

  • Allergy documentation contradicted by treatment

  • Internal NHS notes minimising trauma and bypassing consent

  • A chronology of safeguarding escalation that followed every complaint filed

This isn’t "oversight."
It’s strategic documentation avoidance — and now it’s logged at regulator level.

What they tried to unsee, we printed — and archived.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because harm unfiled is harm unpriced.
Because when a trust ignores adjustment documentation, that is legal liability in draft.
Because retaliation through omission is still retaliation — and the attachments prove it.

Let the record show:

  • The harm was documented

  • The retaliation was traceable

  • The negligence was systemic

  • And SWANK — filed the attachments they pretended didn’t exist

This isn’t a paper trail.
It’s an institutional indictment, bundled in medical contempt.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not allow clinical harm to be reframed as patient miscommunication.
We do not accept regulator shrugs in response to £23 million in injury.
We do not permit omissions to become excuses.

Let the record show:

The evidence was prepared.
The hospitals were informed.
The complaints were punished.
And SWANK — filed every missing paragraph.

This isn’t a follow-up.
It’s the forensic tail of a system trying not to see itself.




No comments:

Documented Obsessions