Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): state failure

Showing posts with label state failure. Show all posts

The Care Plan That Never Was

⟡ SWANK Legal Dispatch II ⟡

A Second Engraving of Institutional Delusion
September 2020

Three Years of Silence and One Letter of Nonsense

I. A Legal Response to a Fabricated Reality

After three years of intrusion without justification, the Department of Social Development (DSD) issued a letter on 11 September 2020, accusing Polly Chromatic of “non-compliance.”

The reply—penned with steel and clarity by Mark A. Fulford of F Chambers—articulated what any legitimate authority should already understand:

"The only point of ‘non-compliance’ would be the alleged Care Plan of August 2019, which, prior to your letter, our client had never seen or heard of."

In other words: You cannot violate a phantom.

II. Absence of Engagement = Institutional Failure

DSD's three-year silence is laid bare as both procedural negligence and a breach of natural justice.

Polly’s correspondence: voluminous, specific, and archived.
DSD’s replies: two in total, only after legal pressure.
Complaints: never disclosed.
Allegations: never served.
Medical reports: withheld entirely.

“Our client has not seen even one complaint, one report, or one shred of documentation.”

A department operating like a rumour mill, not a public authority.

III. Legal Standards Quoted, Institutional Conduct Condemned

“It is trite law that any person, before having their fundamental rights and freedoms infringed, deserves to know the complaint against them.”

The letter is restrained—but humiliating.
It reminds DSD that transparency is not a luxury. It is the law.

IV. A Reasonable Request—Still Unmet

The solicitors at F Chambers requested, plainly and properly:

All documentation relating to the case
All medical records taken during the children’s forced examinations
The mythical August 2019 Care Plan

Only then, the letter stated, could Polly even consider a meeting with a child protection officer.

No reply. No plan. Just bureaucratic mist.

V. Closing Remarks, Laced with Poise

“This does require that all parties and stakeholders act with full transparency, fairness, and reasonableness…”

In SWANK translation:
Produce the paperwork—or stand down.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

A Legal Letter Was Sent. The Harassment Continued.

⟡ SWANK Archive Dispatch ⟡

“The Attorney General Was Notified. The Silence Was Filed.”
Filed: 15 July 2020
Reference: SWANK/TCI/AG-001
📎 Download PDF – 2020-07-15_SWANK_Letter_AG_TCI_SocialDev_Harassment_Homeschool_Trauma.pdf

I. A Letter Was Sent. The Attorney General Did Nothing.

This is the formal complaint addressed to the Attorney General of the Turks and Caicos Islands concerning:

Repeated harassment by Social Development
Systemic intrusion into home education and disability adjustment
The weaponisation of welfare agencies against a medically vulnerable parent

The letter cites trauma, safeguarding misuse, and procedural intimidation.

There was no reply.

No legal rebuttal.
No protective intervention.
Just — silence.

II. The Complaint Was Not Emotional. It Was Evidentiary.

This was not a plea.
It was not a cry for help.
It was a legal letter of record, composed with composure and delivered with jurisdictional clarity.

And like so many others —
it was ignored.

III. What This Document Proves

That legal systems can fail not through action, but through elegant inaction.
That harassment delivered in uniform remains harassment.
That when even Attorneys General refuse to intervene, the public record must.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not consider silence a neutral act.
We do not interpret non-response as innocence.

When the highest legal officer in a territory receives a structured record of harm — and declines to acknowledge it —
that silence becomes part of the misconduct timeline.

We wrote. They didn’t answer.
We archived the void.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.