⟡ Liberty Contacted. State Retaliation Declared. Support Requested. ⟡
“I am writing as the mother of a disabled family facing active state retaliation through fabricated safeguarding and coordinated misconduct.”
Filed: 2 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/LIBERTY/ACCESS-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-02_SWANK_Liberty_RequestForSupport_DisabledFamily_SafeguardingRetaliation.pdf
A formal request for human rights advocacy submitted to Liberty. The letter outlines documented retaliation by police, NHS trusts, and social workers against a medically disabled family pursuing lawful legal claims. Public interest is no longer theoretical — it’s archived.
I. What Happened
On 2 June 2025, Polly Chromatic, Director of SWANK London Ltd., submitted a support request to Liberty, the UK’s leading civil rights organisation.
The letter summarises:
Criminal safeguarding misuse
Retaliation for disability-based legal filings
NHS neglect and obstruction of medical care
Multi-agency coordination across police, social workers, and state services
Ongoing civil and judicial proceedings totalling £23 million in damages
It also attaches:
A written-only communication policy
Evidence-based summaries already submitted to regulators, courts, and journalists
II. What the Filing Establishes
That Liberty is now on record as having received a formal request tied to legal, medical, and human rights abuse
That the state has retaliated against a disabled mother and four children across institutional boundaries
That this is not a local dispute, but a systemic failure of care, access, and law
That support was sought — before the archive simply documented the silence
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because the human rights sector must respond when systems collude.
Because disability retaliation is not accidental.
Because asking for support is an evidentiary act when power fails the vulnerable.
This isn’t a whisper.
It’s a procedural record.
Liberty has been notified — and now, Liberty is archived.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept that advocacy only applies post-detention.
We do not accept the erasure of state-based harm when the survivor is articulate.
We do not accept that a disabled woman must scream for support to deserve it.
SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
If the regulators fail,
We notify the rights groups.
If the rights groups go silent,
We publish that too.
And if no one defends the disabled,
We write it down in font large enough to indict.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.