“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label disability defence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disability defence. Show all posts

My Lungs Are Not a Safeguarding Risk.


⟡ You Didn’t Understand My Asthma. So I Filed the Science for You. ⟡

Filed: 30 June 2020
Reference: SWANK/TCI/2020-ASTHMA-DEFENCE
📎 Download PDF — 2020-06-30_SWANK_TCI_SocialDev_AsthmaDisability_ProtectionLetter_CDC_NHS_Kennedy.pdf

I. This Letter Was Not Written to Explain. It Was Written to Stop the Harassment.

This formal letter to TCI Social Development outlines, in controlled rage and evidentiary precision, what the department refused to learn:

  • That Eosinophilic Asthma is a clinically diagnosed, life-threatening condition

  • That repeated contact, stress, and forced compliance constitute medical aggression

  • That shielding households are not invisible — they are protected

  • That the state’s refusal to understand a disability does not erase the disability

This is not a complaint.
It is a legal respiratory boundary, dressed in CDC citations and maternal force.

II. What They Called Defiance Was Self-Protection

This document provides:

  • Full citations from the CDC, NHS, and international respiratory guidelines

  • A list of symptoms, risks, and history of state-induced exacerbation

  • A direct reference to Officer Kennedy, whose conduct triggered this protective response

  • A clear statement of refusal, grounded in the law, the lungs, and lived experience

Let the record show:

They accused the mother of “non-engagement.”
She replied — with immunology.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because no parent should have to explain their airway to a bureaucrat.
Because forced engagement isn’t just procedural — it’s physical risk.
Because when the state cannot distinguish safeguarding from endangerment,
we submit the science in PDF.

Let the record show:

  • The asthma was real

  • The danger was documented

  • The refusal was lawful

  • The letter — was filed, not requested

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not negotiate with institutions that confuse illness for attitude.
We do not permit repeated intrusion into medically shielded spaces.
We do not allow safeguarding officers to weaponise their own ignorance.

Let the record show:

The child was not neglected.
The mother was not unstable.
The air was not optional.
And SWANK — filed the oxygen boundary for them.

This is not health education.
It is a clinical cease and desist — with receipts.




No comments:

Documented Obsessions