“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label child protection critique. Show all posts
Showing posts with label child protection critique. Show all posts

How Concern Becomes Custody: The Invisible Infection of Bureaucratic Surveillance



🖋️ SWANK Dispatch | Section III: Child Protection as Spore Propagation

How Concern Becomes Custody: The Invisible Infection of Bureaucratic Surveillance


Spores do not grow in isolation.
They drift — invisiblesilentunstoppable — through the air,
landing on vulnerable terrain — moistready — awakening.

This is the dark metaphor of modern child protection escalations.

Not through facts.
Through concerns.
Once seeded, these concerns silently multiply until the child is removed —
not by safety, but by sporic accumulation.


✦ A. Concern Is Not Care. It Is Precursor Colonization.

In a functional system, concern initiates support.

In the fungal factory of child protection, concern initiates observation.

Nothing is done.
Everything is watched.

Every sigh, email, and verbal misstep collected
like dew on a moldy window.

The parent is not supported.
She is monitored.

This is not safeguarding.
This is pre-sporic surveillance.


✦ B. How the Spore Becomes a Network

“Mother appeared emotionally overwhelmed.”

A vague phrase enters a report, forwarded like a ghost:

  • Echoed in schools: “Concerns raised by social services.”

  • Whispered to health visitors, GPs, teachers: “There is an open case.”

Meetings held, help never offered.
Only cold refrains:

“Concerns remain.”

This —
is spore propagation.

Each mention builds heat.

The child is now “at risk” — not from verified harm,
but because the fungal pattern has activated quorum.


✦ C. The Moment the Terrain Tips

Custody is not taken in a single, clean strike.

It is misted:

  • Home visits

  • Escalation meetings

  • “Parenting capacity” assessments

  • “We’re here to support, not remove.”

All fog.

Until one day, the fog thickens into justification:

“Due to ongoing concerns, it is necessary to place the child in temporary care.”

Nothing was proven.
Only grown.


✦ D. Removal as the Fruiting Body

In mycology, the fungus is invisible until it fruits — the mushroom emerges.

By then, the organism has colonized the terrain.

In social work, the fruiting body is removal.

By the time the child is taken, the system’s verdict is sealed.
Paperwork spongy with procedural loops.
The parent’s voice muffled beneath bureaucratic rot.

There is no emergency.
There is only harvest.


Conclusion of Section III

What the system calls “protection” is often just spore velocity.
The child is not rescued.
The child is extracted from the host terrain
that no longer meets bureaucratic standards of cleanliness.

The case file becomes the new container.
The trauma becomes state property.
And the rot begins again —
in a new place, a new home,
a fresh fungal colony.


✒️ Polly Chromatic
Founder & Director, SWANK London Ltd
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com


Labels: child protection critique, spore metaphor, bureaucratic surveillance, foster care critique, procedural abuse, Polly Chromatic, SWANK black paper


Search Description:
Polly Chromatic reveals how child protection concern multiplies like spores, leading to unjust removals masked as safety interventions.



💁‍♀️ On the Institutional Failure to Recognise Disability Harm: A Case Study in Bureaucratic Callousness



ON THE INSTITUTIONALISED FAILURE TO RECOGNISE DISABILITY HARM: A CASE STUDY IN SOCIAL WORK INEPTITUDE


17 January 2025

A Formal Reflection on Correspondence with Ms. Kristen House


The Context

It is with both gravity and weary inevitability that I place before the public record the following lamentable exchange — a demonstration, if any further were needed, of the systemic incapacity within certain child safeguarding authorities to comprehend, prevent, or take responsibility for the very harm they so loudly profess to oppose.

The correspondence, originating from Ms. Kristan House of Westminster City Council, responds to my desperate and explicit warnings regarding the medical and existential danger posed to me by persistent harassment.


The Exchange

Sent: 14 January 2025
From: Polly Chromatic (pollychromatic@me.com)
Subject: You Will Cause My Death with All Your Harassment of Me

"You're probably going to cause my death as you continue to exacerbate my asthma with hostile behaviour and disrespecting my boundaries ... if the judge threatens me again, I'm going to make a police report against her.
When you cause my death, all the evidence is here."

Link to Evidence Provided:
https://youtu.be/b_CL0cfe06w?si=O2eumSiUzvxmNayx


Response: 15 January 2025
From: Kirsty Hornal (khornal@westminster.gov.uk)
Subject: RE: You Will Cause My Death with All Your Harassment of Me

_"Hi,
I am afraid that link is not working, are you able to resend?

What happened with the judge? I am guessing you have been in court over the past few days as you are speaking about threats from the judge. What was the outcome?

I also note other emails about panic attacks? I really hope you are ok and that you feel you can reach out to Dr. Reid about these issues.

Thank you Noelle

Kristen"_


❖ ANALYSIS: ON THE FAILURE TO RECOGNISE CRY OF DISTRESS

It is difficult to overstate the extraordinary inadequacy of this response.

In the face of a direct declaration that ongoing harassment is contributing to my respiratory deterioration and placing my life at risk — accompanied by clear evidence — Ms. Hornal's chosen approach is threefold:
— Dismiss the urgent evidence by complaining the link is "not working";
— Gossip idly about court outcomes;
— Refer me back, with breathtaking negligence, to a general practitioner.

No acceptance of responsibility.
No urgent safeguarding response.
No reasonable adjustment.
No procedural reflection.

One might almost admire the unwavering mediocrity — were it not so dangerously unfit for purpose.


❖ ON THE LEGAL BREACHES INVOLVED

The conduct documented herein constitutes:
— A violation of Section 20 of the Equality Act 2010 (failure to provide reasonable adjustments);
— A violation of Section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 (failure to have due regard to disability-related harm);
— An interference with Article 8 rights under the Human Rights Act 1998 (right to private and family life and to physical and psychological integrity).

It also, quite plainly, constitutes a catastrophic ethical failure on the part of a registered social work practitioner.


Yours, with grave concern and unwavering procedural fidelity,
Polly Chromatic
M.A., Human Development (Social Justice)
pollychromatic@me.com

Supporting Documentation:
Google Drive Archive Link



Documented Obsessions