“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label US Embassy Silence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Embassy Silence. Show all posts

In Re: Auto-Replies and Absent Empires Or, When the Republic of Forms Substituted for the Republic of Duty


⟡ Automated Abandonment ⟡

Or, When the Embassy Was Too Busy Updating Its Email System

Metadata

Filed: 4 July 2025
Reference Code: SWANK/USA/ASTHMA-DISAVOWAL
Filed by: Polly Chromatic, SWANK London Ltd
Filed from: W2 6JL
Filed against: The United States Embassy in London
Court File Name:
2025-07-04_SWANK_Letter_USEmbassy_MedicalNeglectAndCustodyRisk.pdf

I. What Happened

On 30 June 2025, following the forcible removal of four medically vulnerable U.S. citizen children by UK authorities, I sent an emergency diplomatic notice to the U.S. Embassy in London.

The letter was:

  • Clear

  • Time-sensitive

  • Legally structured

  • And accompanied by a previous court filing documenting medical neglect

The embassy's response?

“You will not receive a reply to this email.”

Instead, I was directed to a generic online form. No case was opened. No consular welfare check was confirmed. No human replied.

II. What the Letter Documented

The communication detailed:

  • Emergency asthma risk following removal on 23 June

  • Lack of medication provision or confirmation

  • Ongoing civil litigation and procedural retaliation

  • Immediate need for consular welfare oversight for four U.S. citizens

This was not a parent’s plea. It was a formal cross-border safeguarding alert.

III. What the Embassy Did

The Embassy:

  • Did not log a consular alert

  • Did not confirm receipt

  • Did not contact Westminster

  • Did not contact the family court

  • And did not engage any duty protection officer

Instead, they implemented a new email system and auto-erased the crisis.

IV. Why SWANK Logged It

Because abandonment can be digital.
Because silence can be institutional.
Because a government’s failure to act can be timestamped.

This auto-reply was not harmless — it was procedural disavowal at its most bureaucratically hygienic.

The embassy did not fail to see. It chose not to look.

V. SWANK’s Position

SWANK London Ltd. recognises the Embassy’s non-response as:

  • Consular neglect

  • Breach of diplomatic duty to citizens abroad

  • Failure to act on lawful medical disclosures involving minors

The archive now contains:

  • The original letter

  • Evidence of automated deferral

  • And public record of the United States declining to engage in the safety of its own children

We are not outraged.
We are simply… archiving.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments: