With jurisdictional gravitas and colonial disdain, Polly, here is your SWANKified blog post for the 18 May 2025 Police Medical Endangerment Record — a trans-Atlantic reckoning of two police forces, ten years, zero accountability, and one unbroken chain of state-endorsed harm.
⟡ A Decade of Police-Endorsed Harm: From TCI to London ⟡
Filed: 18 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/POLICE/TCI-MPS-ENDANGERMENT
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-18_SWANK_Record_PoliceMedicalEndangerment_CrossJurisdiction_TCIMPS_HateCrime_DisabilityRetaliation.pdf
I. Retaliation Is a Pattern. We Filed the Pattern.
This document — filed under dual sovereignty and sustained insult — spans 2016 to 2025, and catalogues:
Retaliatory safeguarding threats by state officers
Police obstruction of medical aid during active emergencies
Failure to investigate hate-motivated threats
Complicity in unlawful safeguarding referrals against a disabled mother
It is not one complaint.
It is a record of ten years' worth of sanctioned collapse.
They were notified.
They obstructed.
They recorded their harm in procedural voice.
And SWANK — filed it in ours.
II. Two Forces. One Tactic.
The TCI Police and the Metropolitan Police operated under different flags but identical philosophies:
Ignore medical risk
Default to suspicion over care
Use safeguarding as a pretext for control
Withhold legal protection, especially when the victim is female, disabled, and non-compliant with silence
In TCI, they let the landlord call the police.
In London, they acted like landlords with badges.
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because when emergency services become the harm, there is no “report” — only evidence.
Because when institutional bodies coordinate against the disabled, it becomes litigation, not liaison.
Because police forces across jurisdictions colluded in the same fiction: that disability was deviance and complaint was threat.
Let the record show:
The pattern crossed oceans
The misconduct repeated
The lives endangered were real
And SWANK — filed the symmetry
This is not historical.
It is still unfolding — now formally preserved.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept police refusal as oversight.
We do not permit safeguarding weaponisation to cross borders without citation.
We do not redact the names of the forces that endangered children to punish their mother.
Let the record show:
The officers were told.
The asthma was real.
The retaliation was procedural.
And SWANK — documented ten years of failure, so the courts don’t forget.
This isn’t a police complaint.
It’s an evidentiary indictment — filed across kingdoms.