“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label diplomatic submission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diplomatic submission. Show all posts

Filed to the Foreign Desks: A Dispatch from the Disabled Front


⟡ This Isn’t a Complaint. It’s a Human Rights Dossier. ⟡

Filed: May 2025
Reference: SWANK/DIPLOMACY/UK-RETALIATION
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05_SWANK_IntlHumanRightsBriefing_DisabilityRetaliation_Simlett_v_UK_DiplomaticSubmission.pdf

I. Filed to the Foreign Desks: A Dispatch from the Disabled Front

This document was transmitted directly to:

  • EU diplomatic legal observers

  • U.S. State Department human rights units

  • Canadian federal disability rights offices

It was not shared for sympathy.
It was not styled for activism.
It was filed as a diplomatic intelligence briefing — formal evidence of:

  • Coordinated safeguarding retaliation

  • Housing endangerment by multiple UK boroughs

  • Disability erasure under pretext of policy

  • Procedural cruelty framed as “support”

You failed to protect domestically.
So we filed transnationally.

II. Not Advocacy. Strategy.

This briefing is structured with:

  • Chronological case framing

  • Procedural maps of institutional retaliation

  • Legal reference to the Human Rights Act 1998, UNCRPD, and ICCPR

  • Strategic grounds for diplomatic concern

This is not a request for help.
It is a record of your inaction, sent abroad.

It places the UK’s conduct on the table of foreign legal desks —
not as gossip, but as evidence.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because tribunals protect themselves.
Because local ombudsmen gatekeep harm.
Because the only form of safety is global documentation of what this country has done to disabled families in secret, with forms.

Let the record show:

  • The mother was documented

  • The children were endangered

  • The retaliation was mapped

  • And SWANK — sent it to Geneva, Brussels, Washington, and Ottawa

This isn’t escalation.
It’s sovereign testimony on a transnational stage.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not believe harm ends where jurisdiction begins.
We do not ask domestic regulators to correct abuses they enabled.
We do not wait for apology when we have documentation.

Let the record show:

The UK knew.
The documents were ready.
The retaliation was proven.
And SWANK — filed what Parliament refused to hear.

This isn’t a briefing.
It’s a velvet-wrapped indictment for the international shelf.




No comments:

Documented Obsessions