“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label parental collapse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label parental collapse. Show all posts

She Was Discharged. I Collapsed. You Said Nothing.


⟡ She Got the Medication. I Lost My Breath. You Logged Neither. ⟡
“I sent you the treatment notes. I was the one who stopped breathing.”

Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAILS-24
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_EmailSummary_WCC_HonorDischargeInstructions_ParentRespiratoryCollapse.pdf
Final update sent to Westminster Children’s Services confirming Honor’s hospital discharge plan and reporting parental collapse following the visit — untreated, unacknowledged, and ignored.

I. What Happened

On the evening of 21 November 2024, after securing Heir’s emergency care, the parent:

  • Sent a summary of discharge notes, including medication names and doses

  • Reiterated that Heir was now on prescribed antibiotics following respiratory crisis

  • Confirmed that the parent herself had collapsed shortly after returning home, due to respiratory exhaustion and stress

  • Stated clearly that the family had complied with all medical instructions

  • Received no meaningful response — only escalating safeguarding suspicion

This email was not a request.
It was a declaration of reality — one that Westminster refused to acknowledge.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That Heir’s condition had been formally addressed by medical professionals

  • That parental illness and medical collapse were clearly reported in writing

  • That social services provided no check-in, no support, and no procedural response

  • That this silence was not oversight — it was policy

  • That survival was treated as defiance

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when you’ve completed the treatment,
documented every dose,
and reported your collapse —
and they still escalate against you —
that’s not risk management.
That’s targeted neglect.

Because they want the appearance of concern,
not the burden of accountability.

And because this time, it wasn’t just your daughter who needed medical attention —
it was you.
And they looked the other way.

So now we’ve looked back —
and filed it.

IV. Violations

  • Children Act 1989 / 2004
    Refusal to acknowledge or support a carer after crisis response

  • Equality Act 2010 – Section 20
    Written-only adjustment ignored even during acute respiratory illness

  • Care Act 2014 – Carer Recognition Duty
    No action taken after collapse was formally reported

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Article 3 and 8
    Degrading treatment through institutional silence

V. SWANK’s Position

We didn’t need intervention.
We needed oxygen.

We didn’t refuse support.
We just didn’t beg for it.

This wasn’t neglect on our part.
It was silence on yours.

And now, that silence is documented —
and timestamped.


⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions