🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024
YOU’RE NOT “CHECKING IN”—YOU’RE LOOPING.
Also Titled:
Filed Under: Repeat Referrals, Verbal Coercion, Disregard for Disability, RBKC Redundancy, Court-Evading Safeguarding, NHS Collusion
📎 SUBJECT: Referral from Chelsea & Westminster Hospital
Received by: Samira Issa & Eric Wedge-Bull
Rejected by: Common sense, basic chronology, and every previous reply
“I hope this email is received well.”
— Samira Issa, sending her fourth request for phone or in-person discussion on the same incident already addressed.
You hope it’s received well?
It won’t be.
It’s being received like this:
STOP.
🧾 Recap of Reality:
The “incident” occurred on 2 January 2024.
Referral already answered.
No new event. No new risk.
Court has been informed.
Mother has legal representation.
And still — here you are, again.
⚖️ The Legal Posture:
This is harassment.
This is institutional stalking.
This is retaliation for formal medical complaints.
Your department is not seeking clarity — you’re seeking control.
📞 What Samira asked:
“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation would be beneficial…”
🫁 What the mother replied:
“I cannot breathe.”
“I have repeatedly stated that I cannot talk on the phone.”
“Nothing new has happened.”
“You need to contact the court.”
“Do not contact me again.”
And yet — you came back anyway.
✍️ Let Us Be Clear:
WE DO NOT DO “VERBAL CLARITY.”
We do recorded, time-stamped, documented refusal.
If you need information: Read the file.
If you need direction: Speak to the court.
If you need confirmation: Check the date.
❌ There is no unmet need.
❌ There is no safeguarding risk.
❌ There is no consent to verbal engagement.
But there is plenty of written evidence that you keep ignoring boundaries — even while claiming to “safeguard” them.
Noelle Meline
Already referred. Already replied. Already done.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com
Labels: snobby, formal refusal, safeguarding harassment, verbal coercion, written-only mandate, social work stalking, NHS referral loop, Chelsea & Westminster collusion, RBKC incompetence, court avoidance tactics, asthmatic sovereignty