“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

If You Don’t Respect Written Communication, You Are Not Safeguarding. You’re Stalking.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

YOU’RE NOT “CHECKING IN”—YOU’RE LOOPING.
Also Titled: 

Filed Under: Repeat Referrals, Verbal Coercion, Disregard for Disability, RBKC Redundancy, Court-Evading Safeguarding, NHS Collusion

📎 SUBJECT: Referral from Chelsea & Westminster Hospital

Received by: Samira Issa & Eric Wedge-Bull
Rejected by: Common sense, basic chronology, and every previous reply

“I hope this email is received well.”
— Samira Issa, sending her fourth request for phone or in-person discussion on the same incident already addressed.

You hope it’s received well?

It won’t be.

It’s being received like this:
STOP.

🧾 Recap of Reality:

  • The “incident” occurred on 2 January 2024.

  • Referral already answered.

  • No new event. No new risk.

  • Court has been informed.

  • Mother has legal representation.

And still — here you are, again.

⚖️ The Legal Posture:

This is harassment.
This is institutional stalking.
This is retaliation for formal medical complaints.

Your department is not seeking clarity — you’re seeking control.

📞 What Samira asked:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation would be beneficial…”

🫁 What the mother replied:

“I cannot breathe.”
“I have repeatedly stated that I cannot talk on the phone.”
“Nothing new has happened.”
“You need to contact the court.”
“Do not contact me again.”

And yet — you came back anyway.

✍️ Let Us Be Clear:

WE DO NOT DO “VERBAL CLARITY.”

We do recorded, time-stamped, documented refusal.

If you need information: Read the file.
If you need direction: Speak to the court.
If you need confirmation: Check the date.

❌ There is no unmet need.

❌ There is no safeguarding risk.

❌ There is no consent to verbal engagement.

But there is plenty of written evidence that you keep ignoring boundaries — even while claiming to “safeguard” them.

Noelle Meline
Already referred. Already replied. Already done.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, formal refusal, safeguarding harassment, verbal coercion, written-only mandate, social work stalking, NHS referral loop, Chelsea & Westminster collusion, RBKC incompetence, court avoidance tactics, asthmatic sovereignty

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.

Documented Obsessions