“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

You Said You Were Just Visiting—Then Used It as Surveillance

 ⟡ SWANK Evidence Dispatch: The Visit That Wasn’t Voluntary ⟡


4 July 2023

You Asked for My Address. I Gave It. And You Weaponised It.


Labels: social worker overreach, Eric Wedge-Bull, address misuse, RBKC visit audit, safeguarding entrapment, SWANK consent withdrawal

—

I. The Email That Began with Politeness—and Ended in Procedural Invasion

On 4 July 2023 at 17:22, Noelle Bonneannée sends a courteous message:

“That’s fine. The address is 37 Elgin Crescent basement flat W11 2JD.”

In response to:

“We wondered whether we could come and see you all at your new address next Monday afternoon around 3 pm…” — Eric Wedge-Bull, Advanced Practitioner and Deputy Consultant Social Worker, RBKC

What sounds like a casual check-in was later recoded as a safeguarding visit, then used in documentation as if it had not been consented to voluntarily.

—

II. When a Visit Is Not Just a Visit

Eric's original request:

  • Was warm

  • Referenced a previous visit with Jess

  • Lacked mention of safeguarding

  • Gave the impression of friendly continuity, not concern

But post-visit, this polite exchange was rebranded as if Noelle had been under surveillance.

—

III. The SWANK Principle: Consent Cannot Be Retroactively Redefined

Noelle’s reply demonstrates:

  • Responsiveness

  • Transparency

  • Trust

What she received in return was narrative reengineering.
A slow-motion betrayal staged in procedural formatting.

—

Filed under:
false pretence visitation, weaponised address disclosure, Eric Wedge-Bull archive, RBKC distortion protocol, SWANK trust evidence

© SWANK Archive. All Patterns Reserved. If they needed to pretend it was consented, it means they already knew it wasn’t.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.

Documented Obsessions