⟡ SWANK Conference Dispatch ⟡
28 February 2024
If There’s a Concern, Why Has No One Shared It?
I. A Meeting Invitation—Missing Its Premise
On 28 February 2024, Rhiannon Hodgson, Case Conference Coordinator for the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC), issues a formal letter to Polly Chromatic:
You are invited to attend a Child Protection Conference regarding Regal, Prerogative, Kingdom & Heir on Monday 4 March at 10:30am, at the Malton Road Hub.
Attached: a CPC preparation form.
Absent: any explanation of what the concern actually is.
No allegations. No incident. No cause.
Just a scheduled event demanding presence and submission — without basis.
II. Polly’s Response—Elegant and Devastating
Sent the same morning, timestamped 10:59, from noellebonneannee@me.com, Bcc’d to Nannette Nicholson for institutional memorialisation:
“No one has expressed to me why they are worried about my children.”
“It would be nice if someone could inform me.”
That is the entire response.
A sentence with more dignity than the entire procedure.
A legal haiku of parental defiance.
III. The Pattern: Protecting Children From… What, Exactly?
This is not safeguarding.
This is administrative theatre without a script.
To date, Polly had:
Provided documentation
Repeatedly stated her boundaries
Responded to every referral
Requested clarity multiple times
And yet — RBKC schedules a multi-child protection meeting with no allegation, no trigger, and no procedural legitimacy.
This isn’t protection.
It’s harassment by calendar invite.
📂 Filed under:
protection without premise, safeguarding opacity, child conference performance, parental rights violation, SWANK email rebuke, RBKC procedural breakdown
🔎 Search Description:
RBKC invites parent to child protection conference without stating concern. SWANK response exposes institutional absurdity in one sentence.
© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
If they can’t tell you what you’ve done wrong, you probably haven’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.