⟡ Advance Notice: Police Contact Is a Medical Risk ⟡
“How many times must we say it before it’s called harassment?”
Filed: 15 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/DISABILITY-02
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-15_SWANK-WCC-Advance-Notice-Police-Medical-Risk.pdf
Formal declaration of clinical hazard, legal jurisdiction, and procedural constraints. All communication must be in writing via SWANK London Ltd. Any deviation will be archived as evidence.
I. Read This Before You Knock
Let us proceed without euphemism: police contact constitutes a medical risk, not a misunderstanding.
On 14 June 2025, a man arrived at the private residence of the Director of SWANK London Ltd. He carried a grey plastic-wrapped parcel, knocked repeatedly, called “hello,” and then:
• Photographed the front door
• Opened the private mail chute
• Peered into the home — uninvited, unidentified, and undocumented
No delivery occurred.
No identity was provided.
No apology was issued.
No justification was offered.
No authority was lawfully in play.
This was not logistics.
It was a pantomime of legitimacy, choreographed to resemble procedure, but executed like coercion.
All of it occurred in direct defiance of documented medical notice that such contact induces:
• Acute respiratory reaction
• Psychiatric destabilisation
• Functional verbal shutdown
These are not personal preferences.
They are diagnosed conditions, medically certified and legally protected.
To disregard them is not ignorance. It is institutional malice under administrative costume.
II. Procedural Mandates for Contact
Effective immediately and without exception:
• All communication must be directed in writing to SWANK London Ltd.
✉️ Email: director@swanklondon.com
• No verbal contact. No physical approach. No audio at the threshold.
This includes “hellos,” knocking, or hovering in architectural proximity.
• Attendance by police, state agents, or affiliates shall not occur unless:
◦ Accompanied by a judicial warrant
◦ Justified by a legally admissible safeguarding threshold
◦ Or preceded by formal written consent from the Director — which shall not be presumed, inferred, or theatrically improvised
• The Director of SWANK London Ltd. is medically exempt from verbal engagement.
Silence is not ambiguity.
Silence is not agreement.
Silence is jurisdictional protection, not an opportunity for interpretation.
• Any attempt to circumvent these terms — through photography, body cameras, postal disguise, or visual intrusion via chute or frame — will be immediately archived as escalation.
III. Violations
The above event constitutes material breaches of the following statutory provisions:
• Equality Act 2010, s.20 – Failure to accommodate a legally documented disability
• Human Rights Act 1998, Article 8 – Infringement of private and family life via unauthorised contact
• UK GDPR – Attempted acquisition of interior visual data without consent or notice
• Protection from Harassment Act 1997 – Sustained pattern of conduct following formal withdrawal of consent
• Safeguarding Statutory Guidance – Improper contact misrepresented as concern
• Basic Principles of Clinical Safety – Induced health risk in defiance of declared exemption
IV. SWANK’s Position
This was not an oversight.
It was not miscommunication.
It was state theatre, performed in costume, against instruction, on a medically vulnerable household — for no lawful purpose.
We no longer interpret props as procedural validity.
We no longer accept choreography as care.
We no longer indulge the bureaucratic fantasy that procedural trespass becomes lawful if it arrives in a plastic sleeve.
This was not safeguarding.
It was staged incursion.
And it is now formally entered into the archive as evidence of systemic retaliation against medical constraint.
You were warned.
Now you are recorded.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.