“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label St Thomas Hospital. Show all posts
Showing posts with label St Thomas Hospital. Show all posts

In Re: The Origin of the Error – Gaslighting at 44 Percent Saturation


π’ͺπ“π“Žπ‘”π‘’π“ƒ, π’ͺπ“…π“‰π’Ύπ’Έπ“ˆ & π’ͺ𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓇𝑒𝒢𝒸𝒽

A SWANK London Ltd. Postmortem on the Allegation That Launched a Case

πŸ“Ž Filed: 9 July 2025

Reference Code: SWANK-ADD-0711-INTX-OXYGEN
Court File Name: 2025-07-09_Addendum_EPOOrigin_FalseIntoxication_44PercentO2
Case No: ZC25C50281
Jurisdiction: Public Law – Central Family Court
PDF Download: Included in bundle filed to court and UN
Summary: The only cited “safeguarding risk” that justified Local Authority involvement was a hospital misreading — from a woman gasping for oxygen to a woman accused of being drunk.

I. What Happened

On 2 November 2023, Polly Chromatic attended St Thomas’ Hospital with a venous oxygen saturation of 44% — a medical emergency. Rather than recognise the visible respiratory collapse and neurological distress, hospital staff misread the situation as intoxication and falsely reported her to safeguarding authorities.

There was no tox screen. No diagnosis of intoxication. Just: “no abnormality detected” and a report filed.

This was the only event ever cited as the origin of Westminster Children’s Services’ involvement.

II. What the Addendum Establishes

The full blood gas panel submitted as Exhibit A (see PDF) confirms:

  • Oxygen saturation (SO2): 44.0%

  • Oxyhaemoglobin: 43.4%

  • Deoxyhaemoglobin: 55.2%

These are not the markers of drunkenness — they are the markers of a dying person.

The court has now been provided with the data that disproves the only trigger for the entire safeguarding apparatus.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

This wasn’t a referral — it was a misdiagnosis weaponised into a child protection case.

From this one false referral grew a two-year campaign of surveillance, hostility, and eventual child removal, culminating in an Emergency Protection Order with no new incident, no risk threshold, and no legitimate procedural ground.

To protect face, the authorities created procedural theatre, relied on institutional muscle memory, and ignored both the parent’s evidence and the hospital’s original sin.

IV. Violations

  • Safeguarding Weaponisation

  • Medical Negligence & Misreporting

  • False Referral and Defamatory Assumption

  • Disability Misunderstanding (Asthma & Dysphonia)

  • Procedural Abuse under Children Act 1989 and Human Rights Act 1998

V. SWANK’s Position

The EPO is not simply “flawed.”
It is invalid at origin.
A foundation built on falsehood cannot support any lawful order.

This post and court filing will stand as a permanent record of the fact that a woman with 44% oxygen saturation — who survived to advocate — was falsely accused and punished for seeking medical help.
Her children were taken.
This is what started the case.
This is what ends it.

⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Downloaded via www.swanklondon.com
Not edited. Not deleted. Only documented.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

The Record Says Removed. The Truth Says Suffocating.


⟡ SWANK Criminal Record Correction Notice ⟡

“I Left Because I Couldn’t Breathe. They Filed It as Force.”
Filed: 23 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/CPS/METPOL/2025-05-23
πŸ“Ž Download PDF – 2025-05-23_SWANK_CPSPoliceComplaint_InaccurateSecurityClaim_StThomasIncident.pdf

I. They Filed the Lie. We Filed the Correction.

On 23 May 2025, SWANK London Ltd. issued a formal complaint and correction notice to the Crown Prosecution Service and Metropolitan Police regarding an inaccurate incident claim filed in judicial and police records.

The claim:

That our Director, a disabled patient, was “removed by security” from St Thomas’ Hospital.

The reality:

She left voluntarily, unaided, and in respiratory distress — following clinical mishandling, unlawful delay, and procedural hostility.
She tested positive for COVID-19 the following day.
She had an active diagnosis of eosinophilic asthma.
She was not removed. She was endangered.

II. What the Complaint Clarifies

The submission to CPS and the Metropolitan Police details:

  • The fabrication of “security removal” in the MG5 (case summary)

  • The absence of any such action in hospital CCTV or staff documentation

  • Medical evidence showing the patient was mid-asthma collapse

  • Clinical failure to accommodate disability adjustments

  • Institutional refusal to acknowledge the resulting harm — physical and reputational

This was not a safeguarding incident.
This was a defamatory act of record tampering, committed through silence and assumption.

III. Why This Filing Was Necessary

Because police summaries become court documents.
Because what is said casually on a form becomes lawful myth unless contested.
Because disability should not be rewritten as deviance, and
Because breathlessness is not misconduct.

SWANK issued this complaint not as a plea, but as record control.

We do not allow “security removal” to become shorthand for institutional inconvenience.
We do not permit lies to fossilise.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We left that hospital because breathing became impossible.
They left the truth because accountability was inconvenient.

Let the record show:

We were not removed.
We walked.
And now we’ve filed.

This document now lives in the archive — not for rebuttal, but for citation.
And should the CPS or police decline to correct the falsehood, that omission becomes part of the next filing.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments: