🪞 THE FANTASY OF INTOXICATION: How a 44% Oxygen Reading Triggered State-Sanctioned Seizure
⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Filed: 9 July 2025
Reference Code: SWANK-ADD-0711-INTX-OXYGEN
Filename: 2025-07-11_Addendum_EPOOrigin_FalseIntoxication_44PercentO2.pdf
Summary: This was the lie that started it all.
I. What Happened
In early 2024, Polly Chromatic presented to St Thomas’ Hospital with a critically low oxygen level of 44% — a life-threatening respiratory event consistent with eosinophilic asthma and post-environmental poisoning distress.
Instead of treating this emergency with care, the hospital staff falsely reported her as “intoxicated.” This single, baseless allegation — made in ignorance and received without question — was the spark that launched a two year-long firestorm of safeguarding overreach.
Shortly after, RBKC Children’s Services intervened, citing this claim as the foundation for escalating to Child Protection. The Local Authority never corrected the error. Westminster took the baton and ran with it.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
This was not a misunderstanding. It was:
A false medical narrative constructed during a respiratory emergency
Used to justify escalating state involvement without a lawful threshold
Repeated, referenced, and relied upon by professionals for over a year
The only alleged risk event preceding the 23 June 2025 EPO
Proven factually untrue, with documentary hospital evidence now submitted to court
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because this is where it began — not with parenting failure, not with educational neglect, not with risk. But with a hospital misreading of a dying woman’s oxygen levels.
Because this is not just negligence. It’s institutional theatre.
Because every document filed since — every social work email, every court report, every procedural trap — has been tainted by the lie that the parent was intoxicated, rather than critically hypoxic.
IV. Violations
Article 8 ECHR – Right to private and family life, breached on false medical grounds
Children Act 1989 – No lawful risk threshold ever met
Equality Act 2010 – Disability discrimination, failure to make medical accommodations
Tort of Negligence – Misdiagnosis, reputational harm, procedural harm
Safeguarding Misuse – EPO founded on falsity; no fresh incident preceded removal
V. SWANK’s Position
This isn’t just the origin — it’s the original sin. The entire safeguarding premise collapses once the intoxication myth is corrected. The 44% oxygen reading tells the truth. And the truth renders every action that followed unlawful, retaliatory, and procedurally null.
The children were taken on a lie.
The court was misled by omission.
The agencies escalated rather than investigated.
The lie is now exposed.
⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Downloaded via www.swanklondon.com
Not edited. Not deleted. Only documented.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.