“My Children Deserve Better Than This Government”
⟡ A 10-Page Petition Detailing Safeguarding Abuse, State Harassment, Medical Assault, and Constitutional Erosion
IN THE MATTER OF: Systemic incompetence, sexualised medical violence, lawful homeschooling, and the state’s deep confusion about how laws work
⟡ METADATA
Filed: 15 July 2020
Reference Code: SWANK-TCI-HRC-FINALPETITION
Court File Name: 2020-07-15_Records_HRCComplaintSocialDevelopmentAbuseAndRightsViolations
Summary: This final, exhaustive petition to the Human Rights Commission outlines 3.5 years of harassment by the Department of Social Development. It details unlawful investigations, medical abuse of children, constitutional breaches, homeschooling sabotage, disability discrimination, trespass during COVID lockdown, and the state’s absolute inability to articulate the legal basis of its interference. It is statutorily referenced, medically supported, and completely devastating.
I. What Happened
After obtaining full legal approval to homeschool her children, Polly Chromatic (then Noelle Bonneannée) endured a multi-year campaign of safeguarding “concern” that involved:
Sexual assault of her sons on hospital exam tables in front of 9 adults
Illegal trespass on private property during the COVID lockdown
Unlawful demands to forcibly retract her children’s foreskin
Yelling through her windows
Entering her home without notice
Ignoring her formal complaints and medical documentation
Refusing to close an investigation or provide the mandatory written report
Despite following every procedure, submitting every curriculum, and responding to every demand, she and her children remained targeted. This petition exposes every part of that misconduct.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
That TCI’s Children Ordinance 2015 §17(6) mandates that parents receive investigation reports — which never occurred
That the Emergency Powers (COVID-19) Regulations were violated by social workers entering private property during lockdown
That the Department of Social Development caused emotional and psychological abuse through medical misconduct and invasive, erratic visits
That constitutional rights were violated in no fewer than 11 categories, including:
Right to family life
Protection from inhuman treatment
Right to education
Freedom of conscience and belief
Freedom from discrimination
Protection of property and private life
That the state failed to follow its own laws, ignored documentation, and repeatedly disrupted the wellbeing of a thriving, legally protected homeschool family
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because when safeguarding becomes sexual abuse, someone must file it. Because the law exists to protect children — not to harass their mothers. Because composting toilets are not child endangerment. Because quoting §17(6) for the sixth time in six months is not “excessive” — it’s survival. And because this petition proves, with chilling clarity, that the government of Turks and Caicos was not protecting a family — it was dismantling one.
IV. Violations
Statutory breach of Children Ordinance 2015 §17(6)
Violation of Education Ordinance 2009
Violation of Emergency Powers (COVID-19) Regulations
Unlawful trespass
Sexual assault of children by medical staff
Disability discrimination (eosinophilic asthma)
Procedural harassment and emotional trauma
11 direct constitutional rights violations
Misuse of safeguarding to enforce cultural conformity
V. SWANK’s Position
We log this petition as a constitutional masterpiece. SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
That this case is not about protection — it is about persecution
That forcing foreskin retraction is not “cultural difference” — it is abuse
That social workers yelling through windows during a pandemic are not acting in anyone’s best interest
That quoting 10 laws in 10 pages is not excess — it is defence
That this document belongs in a law school textbook titled “What Happens When the State Forgets Its Place”