🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 10 December 2024
“Child in Need of a Lawyer”
aka Why Are My Children on This Plan Again?
Filed Under: Illegal Planning · Discriminatory Safeguarding · Disability Retaliation · CIN Confusion · Police Report Pending · SWANK London Ltd
—
Dear Kirsty, Sarah, Fiona & Associates in Manufactured Concern,
I asked a very simple question:
“What is the concern about my children?”
And the room—predictably—fell silent.
Because there isn’t one.
You dragged my children through a “significant risk of harm” plan for an entire year,
not because of evidence, but because of disability discrimination.
And now you repackage it—new label, same lie—as a Child in Need plan?
No.
We are not confused.
We are insulted.
I wrote:
“I’ll be making a police report against Sarah for this entire illegal investigation.”
Because I mean it.
Because the law is not a theatre prop.
Because every baseless plan you file will be refiled—as evidence.
This is not support.
This is retaliation with a PowerPoint presentation.
And we do not consent to further performance.
—
📍 Telepathically archived by:
Polly Chromatic
Legally astute · Respiratory sovereign · Full-time witness to procedural theatre
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Papertrails Reserved.