🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 10 December 2024
“Child in Need of a Lawyer”
aka Why Are My Children on This Plan Again?
Filed Under: Illegal Planning · Discriminatory Safeguarding · Disability Retaliation · CIN Confusion · Police Report Pending · SWANK London Ltd
—
Dear Kirsty, Sarah, Fiona & Associates in Manufactured Concern,
I asked a very simple question:
“What is the concern about my children?”
And the room—predictably—fell silent.
Because there isn’t one.
You dragged my children through a “significant risk of harm” plan for an entire year,
not because of evidence, but because of disability discrimination.
And now you repackage it—new label, same lie—as a Child in Need plan?
No.
We are not confused.
We are insulted.
I wrote:
“I’ll be making a police report against Sarah for this entire illegal investigation.”
Because I mean it.
Because the law is not a theatre prop.
Because every baseless plan you file will be refiled—as evidence.
This is not support.
This is retaliation with a PowerPoint presentation.
And we do not consent to further performance.
—
📍 Telepathically archived by:
Polly Chromatic
Legally astute · Respiratory sovereign · Full-time witness to procedural theatre
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Papertrails Reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.