“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Documented Obsessions

She Said He Wasn’t in Education. He Was — She Just Didn’t Like the Truth.


⟡ “She Lied About My Son’s Education — Because the Truth Would Have Protected Him” ⟡
A formal complaint to Social Work England against Kirsty Hornal, documenting professional misconduct, disability retaliation, and the calculated misrepresentation of a child’s educational safety.

Filed: April 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/SWE-02
📎 Download PDF – 2024-04-24_SWANK_Complaint_SWE_KirstyHornal_PLO_DisabilityBreach_EducationHarm.pdf
Complaint to Social Work England naming Kirsty Hornal for breaching professional standards and retaliating against a disabled parent through safeguarding escalation and factual distortion. Accuses Hornal of rewriting Regal’s educational history to justify state intrusion.

I. What Happened

In early 2024, Social Worker Kirsty Hornal — acting on behalf of Westminster Children’s Services — initiated statutory escalation under the Public Law Outline (PLO). Her justification? That the parent wasn’t cooperating, and that the child, Regal, wasn’t in education.

This complaint proves:

  • The parent had formally notified the local authority of lawful homeschooling

  • Regal was engaged in a legally compliant, medically protective, and trauma-informed educational structure

  • Hornal’s claim that “the child is not in education” was not an error — it was defamation, with consequences

Meanwhile, the parent had been repeatedly requesting written-only communication for medical reasons — a request ignored, mocked, and later recharacterised as non-compliance.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That Kirsty Hornal misrepresented Regal’s education to manufacture statutory risk

  • That verbal-only engagement demands were medically contraindicated and legally unsupported

  • That retaliation followed regulatory complaint activity — not any real safeguarding concern

  • That the social worker’s actions inflicted measurable harm, emotional distress, and reputational injury

  • That multiple disability specialists (Dr. José, Dr. Rafiq) had confirmed the necessary adjustments

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because professional misconduct should not be protected by job title. Because defaming a child’s education in order to justify retaliation is not safeguarding — it’s narrative warfare.

SWANK archived this complaint to:

  • Begin the process of regulatory accountability under SWE

  • Refute Westminster’s claims at source — not just in court, but in code

  • Ensure the record reflects who harmed Regal — and who protected him

IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 –
    • Section 20: Failure to adjust communication protocol
    • Section 27: Retaliation for protected activity
    • Section 149: Public duty breached through bias and narrative distortion

  • Social Work England Standards –
    • 3.1: Communicate openly and truthfully
    • 3.4: Respect diverse needs, including disability
    • 5.1: Manage records factually
    • 6.2 & 6.4: Respond to concerns without personal prejudice

  • Education Act 1996 – Misrepresentation of lawful elective home education

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Article 8 (family life), Article 14 (discrimination)

V. SWANK’s Position

You cannot fabricate a child’s absence from education to justify violating his rights. You cannot ignore a parent’s disability and then call her “non-compliant.” And you cannot weaponise your own misinformation and pretend it’s concern.

What Kirsty Hornal did is not just a regulatory breach — it is a factual lie with legal intent. And now, it’s archived.

SWANK London Ltd. demands:

  • Full Social Work England review of Kirsty Hornal’s professional record

  • Immediate correction of Regal’s educational status in all WCC records

  • Regulatory suspension pending resolution of this complaint

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.