“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Documented Obsessions

Chromatic v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis: A Household Seized Without Law or Logic


⟡ FORCED FAMILY DISMANTLING BY UNIFORM ⟡
No Warrant. No Safeguard. No Shame.

Filed: 26 June 2025
Reference: SWK/POL-REMOVAL/0623-2025
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-26_SWANK_Removal_MetPolice_UnlawfulExtraction.pdf
1-line summary: Police removed children from their home without legal grounds, process, or protection.

I. What Happened

On 23 June 2025, five Metropolitan Police officers forced entry into the home of Polly Chromatic — a disabled mother — and extracted her children without any lawful documentation. The removal occurred while the children were peacefully playing and their mother was in her bedroom. No Emergency Protection Order, Police Protection Order, or voluntary consent under Section 20 existed. No safeguarding risk was presented. No trauma-informed worker was present.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • No legal basis for police entry or removal

  • Failure to meet any statutory threshold under Children Act 1989

  • No documentation, no warrant, no prior notice

  • Discriminatory and coercive action targeting a disabled parent

  • Breaches of Articles 6 and 8 of the Human Rights Act

  • Violation of international law under the UNCRC

III. Why SWANK Logged It

This wasn’t safeguarding. It was state-sponsored trauma.
When the system finds no fault, it fabricates one.
The silence around this act of seizure is a howl of institutional complicity — and we archived it.

IV. Violations

  • Children Act 1989, Sections 44, 46, and 20 – No valid protective basis

  • PACE 1984 – No warrant or legal entry justification

  • Equality Act 2010 – No disability accommodations

  • Human Rights Act 1998, Articles 6 & 8 – Denial of due process and family life

  • UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Articles 3 & 9 – Separation without judicial review

V. SWANK’s Position

The Metropolitan Police acted not as protectors of the law, but as enforcers of procedural fiction.
Their actions rewrote a family’s reality — but we rewrote it back.
This was an extraction, not an intervention.

We will escalate to:

  • IOPC

  • EHRC

  • PHSO

  • Judicial Review proceedings (if required)

This is not forgotten. This is archived.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.