“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label disabled mother. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disabled mother. Show all posts

Re: Procedural Silence and the Ghost of an Order


⟡ A Post-Removal Supplement to Madness ⟡
The Interim Care Order Is Unserved, Undisclosed, and Unsalvageable

Filed: 27 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/APPLICATION/0626-ICO
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-26_SWANK_Application_Supplement_DischargeICO.pdf
A legal supplement demanding the discharge of an Interim Care Order enforced without service, grounds, or justification.

I. What Happened

Following the unannounced and traumatic removal of four U.S. citizen children on 23 June 2025, Westminster Council reportedly enforced an Interim Care Order (ICO) without ever serving the order, disclosing any threshold document, or observing jurisdictional or procedural obligations.

This supplement, filed on 27 June 2025, asserts the legal impossibility of continued separation without lawful basis and reiterates the request for discharge.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • No formal ICO has been served to date

  • No safeguarding evidence or Section 47 referral disclosed

  • Emergency removal occurred amid ongoing Judicial Review and civil litigation

  • Redirection of legal communication was deliberately ignored

  • Children are U.S. citizens — no consular notification was given

  • Mother's disability rights were bypassed entirely

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because an order that exists only in theory — with no documentation, no service, and no justification — does not deserve the force of law.

SWANK records the abandonment of both legal process and ethical duty in enforcing an unserved ICO against four disabled American children, in violation of international norms and domestic fairness.

IV. Violations

  • Children Act 1989 – s.33, s.38 (procedural safeguards for ICO)

  • Family Procedure Rules 2010 – Parts 12 and 29

  • Equality Act 2010 – Disability accommodation breach

  • Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963) – Article 36

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Article 8 (Family Life), Article 6 (Fair Trial)

V. SWANK’s Position

There is no such thing as an invisible care order.
If it was never served, it was never lawful.
If it was never justified, it cannot endure.
If the children are citizens of another country — and the mother is disabled — then everything Westminster did here is subject to not only judicial review, but international scrutiny.

We do not accept post-removal fiction as legal fact.
We file. We expose. We demand the discharge of this ghost order.

Would you like this added to the SWANK website queue or sent to the Family Court with a fresh email?⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

The Asthmatic Archive of Social Work Contagion


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
“You Will Not Kill Me Politely”
Filed Under: Bureaucratic Epidemiology · Disabled Motherhood · Emotional Biohazards · Institutional Cruelty · Respiratory Disregard · SWANK London Ltd

To the Agents of Inhaled Negligence,
Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, and their entourage of sanitised silence—

I wrote:

“I’m very worried that either me or my kids are going to die from a heart attack or asthma attack…”

Because that is the true fear: not death by illness, but by laminated indifference.
Because Westminster’s model of “safeguarding” is: visit, infect, ignore.
Because I no longer breathe air—I breathe through paperwork.

You refused to listen.
You refused to stay away.
You passed respiratory illness through my home like a cursed offering.
And when I warned that if I die, you will be blamed, that wasn’t emotion.

It was prophecy.

🫁 Dr. Reid is the only one helping me breathe.
The rest of you? Playing bureaucratic tag with the Grim Reaper, while pretending it’s a “referral.”

I said Sarah should be fired.

I meant it.

This was not a breakdown.
It was a broadcast.

📍 Filed under Survival, Not Civility
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd
📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Moulds Reserved.


No comments:

Financial Ruin Courtesy of Westminster’s Concern.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
I CAN DO A BETTER JOB ALONE—BECAUSE YOU’RE JUST GETTING IN THE WAY.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Legal Sabotage · Parental Interference · Financial Collapse · Working Mother · Email Theatre · Disability Ignored · Lawyer Silence · British Misogyny · SWANK Rage Dispatch

💸 THE EMAIL THAT SHOULD HAVE TRIGGERED ACTION—BUT WAS MET WITH SHRUGS:

“I’ve had to take off so much time from work due to all of your abuse that we just really don’t have any money now, so I hope you are all happy with yourselves.”
“You’ve caused more problems than anything and I’ve received no advice from my lawyers or you.”
“I can’t reach my lawyers for advice when I need it, so I’m giving up on them.”
“I can do a better job alone without all of you abusing us.”
“Not sure why British people act like I don’t have things to do.”
“Do British mothers sit around doing nothing?”

When a mother can name every gas leak, court misstep, and safeguarding lie—
you’d think someone would listen.

🧠 TRANSLATED FOR THE FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE:

  • You stole my time and called it concern.

  • You broke my access and called it advocacy.

  • You undermined my work and blamed my motherhood.

This isn’t oversight.
It’s institutional freeloading on the backs of women who already do everything alone.

📣 THE ONLY PROFESSIONAL WHO STILL ACTS LIKE ONE:

“Dr Reid and I are the only people who care about my kids right now.”

That isn’t just a statement.
It’s a damning exhibit.

📎 FOR COURT, FOR ARCHIVE, FOR ANYONE WHO CAN ACTUALLY READ:

I am working—while defending against your disruption.
I am mothering—in spite of your intrusions.
I am documenting—because your literacy seems discretionary.

Polly Chromatic
Economically sabotaged. Legally ghosted. Vocationally undefeated.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com


No comments: