Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): Dr Arjumand

Showing posts with label Dr Arjumand. Show all posts

The Doctor Who Chose Doubt Over Breath

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 23 November 2024

“Evil Is a Clinical Attitude, Not a Diagnosis”
Filed Under: Clinical Abuse · Diagnostic Gaslighting · Institutional Malice · Verbal Hostility · SWANK London Ltd

Dear Kirsty,

“Maybe you could call that evil doctor and ask her why she didn’t believe me…”

Let’s not be coy.
Let’s be clear.

Dr Arjumand.
St Mary’s Hospital.
A clinician whose diagnostic repertoire consists of disbelief, disdain, and documented harm.

“I can’t verbally argue about it each time I go to A&E.”

Nor should I have to.
Verbal argument is not a prerequisite for care.
It is not a treatment pathway.
It is a trap.

She didn’t assess Heir.
She didn’t listen.
She didn’t care.
She made me worse.

And when I spoke up?
The system did what it always does—retreated into silence, then emerged with blame.

“I won’t put up with being abused and then blamed for it.”

Precisely.
Because post-abuse defamation is not “clinical reflection.” It’s bureaucratic sadism.

“I’m planning an email attack…”

Not threats.
Not violence.
Just: evidence. Elegance. Escalation.
You call it noncompliance.
I call it documented dissent with legal teeth.

📍 Evil Identified. Response Prepared.

Polly Chromatic
Anti-Gaslighting Commander · Institutional Memory Specialist
✉ director@swanklondon.com | 🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Clinical Abusers Archived.

When I Say I Can’t Breathe, I Don’t Mean Emotionally.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
YOU KEEP TREATING ASTHMA AS AN ATTITUDE. IT’S A CONDITION.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Respiratory Prejudice · Paediatric Neglect · Hospital Disbelief · School Blame Loops · Disability Disregard · Access Failure · Asthma Stigma · SWANK Respiratory Defence Files

To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Harley Street Mental Health, Nannette Nicholson

🧬 THREE SIMPLE FAILURES (THAT DESTROY BREATH AND DIGNITY):

Hospital staff who argue instead of assess
Inaccurate measurements used as emotional cudgels
Lifelong disbelief masquerading as protocol

You’ve mistaken medical emergency for personality flaw.
Our lungs don’t require your opinion—just air.

💬 A BREATHLESS TESTIMONY:

“Dr Arjumand asked for the history and then told me: I don’t believe you.”
“She said it several times while I was struggling to breathe.”
“Before that moment, my breathing was amazing—a first in over a year.”
“I don’t want to argue about it. They can check us, and if they don’t want to help, we leave.”

You don’t assess.
You antagonise.

👁 A LIFETIME OF NON-BELIEF:

“My whole life I’ve had to do this because no one believes me when I say I can’t breathe.”
“This includes schools, universities, parents, employers. Everyone.”
“Now I watch my children get treated the same way. And I get blamed for defending them.”

What you call "concern," we recognise as generational disbelief.
And it’s been archived.

🫁 WE WANT ASTHMATIC FRIENDS, NOT GASLIGHTERS:

“Blind people have blind friends. Deaf people have deaf friends. Even races stick to their own.”
“We want friends who have asthma. Severe asthma.”
“People who understand what it means to live like this.”
“We create our own fun. We invite those who respect our lungs.”

We are not antisocial.
We are allergically selective.

⚠️ SOCIETY IS THE ISOLATOR. NOT US:

“We are isolated due to our asthma and society’s unwillingness to accept us.”
“We want to be social, but not with people who deny our experience.”
“It is traumatising because no one understands us.”

Inclusion without understanding is surveillance, not solidarity.
We decline the invitation.

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT (FOR THE RECORD, AGAIN):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

You ignore our lungs and interrogate our tone.
We are done performing for your disbelief.

Polly Chromatic
Mother of four. Each one breathes truth louder than your policy.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breaths Backed Up.

Three Problems, One Condition, No Compassion.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE JUST WANT TO BREATHE—NOT BE BLAMED FOR EXISTING.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Medical Disbelief · Respiratory Torture · Social Rejection · Asthma Isolation · Telepathic Clarity · NHS Hostility · School Gaslighting · Chronic Misunderstanding · SWANK Testimonial Evidence File

📍 To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Harley Street Mental Health, Nannette Nicholson

❌ THREE RECURRING INSTITUTIONAL FAILURES:

Defensive hospital staff who treat symptoms as accusations.
Protocol defiance and diagnostic laziness, dressed in lanyards.
Gaslighting as standard—“We don’t believe you” as a care plan.

Dr Arjumand repeated—several times—“I don’t believe you,”
while I was visibly, audibly, physiologically struggling to breathe.
My children watched. No one intervened. Again.

🫁 THE LONGEST SYMPTOM: DISBELIEF

“My whole life, I’ve had to explain my inability to breathe—and still not be believed.”
“From classrooms to clinics, I’ve been called dramatic, then blamed for being right.”
“Now my children are punished for their lungs, and I’m vilified for defending them.”

There is no gas stronger than medical contempt.
And no inhaler for institutional ego.

👁 HUMANITY REQUIRES MIRRORING—NOT SURVEILLANCE

“Blind people have blind friends. Deaf people have deaf friends.
Even racial communities seek mutual comfort.”
“We want friends who breathe like us. Who understand what it means to survive the air.”
“I breastfed all four of my children to prevent this illness. They got it anyway.
And they are still the only ones who understand me.”

This isn’t martyrdom. It’s physiology.
And you’re not listening. You’re watching with a clipboard.

💡 OUR REQUESTS (WRITTEN, AS ALWAYS):

Respect the written access adjustment.
Treat us without interrogation.
Stop requiring verbal performance to access care.
Believe the data, not your mood.
Stop punishing asthmatic existence.

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT: STILL VALID. STILL IGNORED.

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

This is not ambiguity.
This is refusal to perform your preferred pantomime of health.

Polly Chromatic
Mother of four. Truth-teller by breath. Refuser of bureaucratic delusion.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Disbelief Cross-Examined.

Belief as Treatment: Why Refusing to Trust Disabled Patients Is a Public Health Crisis

⟡ “This Is THE Problem” ⟡
A Multi-Generational Asthma Testimony on Medical Disbelief, Social Misfit, and the Right to Be Believed While Suffocating

Filed: 23 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-05
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-23_SWANK_Email_Reid_HospitalDisbelief_DisabilityWitnessNarrative.pdf
Email sent to medical, legal, and safeguarding authorities detailing the traumatic impact of disbelief toward a disabled mother and her asthmatic children — both socially and medically.

I. What Happened

In this message, Polly Chromatic writes plainly: there are three problems —

Defensive hospital staff
Basic failure to follow protocol
Being treated like a liar while trying to breathe

This email was sent to Dr. Philip Reid, Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Laura Savage, and others. It documents:

A direct quote from a doctor who said: “I don’t believe you” during a respiratory flare
The recurrence of disbelief across schools, hospitals, and social work settings
A refusal to have her children endure the same
The social need for peers who share their condition — not just tolerate it

It closes with a statement of grief, resolve, and perspective:

“I feel blessed that they have it. I can’t however stand to see them suffer the way I have.”

II. What the Complaint Establishes

Medical trauma from being dismissed in the middle of acute breathing distress
Chronic disbelief of both verbal and non-verbal disability symptoms
Social exclusion as a direct outcome of medical scepticism
Cultural insight into why affinity-based communities matter for marginalised health conditions
Witness-level account of procedural neglect, generational asthma, and institutional cruelty

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this email is not about one doctor, or one A&E visit.
It is about disbelief as policy, and the violence of being told “you’re fine” while gasping for air.

It’s also a sociological diagnosis: of why children raised in systems that deny disability must form private worlds — not for retreat, but for survival.

SWANK logs it not as a grievance, but as a testimonial archive — one that collapses law, health, and anthropology into a single witness statement.

IV. SWANK’s Position

This wasn’t overreaction. It was resistance from someone who’s spent a lifetime explaining why she can’t talk — to people who never listen.

We do not accept that verbal disability must be disbelieved until collapse.
We do not accept that asthma must be proven through trauma to qualify for care.
We will document every doctor who said “I don’t believe you” — and every breath that had to answer them.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

The Email Before the Complaint Flood: How One Sentence Documented a Plan for Retaliatory Truth

⟡ “Maybe You Could Call That Evil Doctor” ⟡
When A Disabled Mother Had to Crowdsource Accountability Because Breathing Wasn’t Enough

Filed: 23 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-06
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-23_SWANK_Email_Reid_StMarysDisbelief_DoctorEscalationWarning.pdf
Email to Dr. Philip Reid and safeguarding officials naming Dr. Arjumand at St Mary’s Hospital for disbelief during respiratory crisis and announcing formal protest escalation.

I. What Happened

On 23 November 2024, Polly Chromatic emailed social workers, legal contacts, and her GP stating that Dr. Arjumand at St Mary’s refused to believe her medical condition during an A&E visit. She did not scream. She did not threaten. She asked:

“Maybe you could call that evil doctor and ask her why she didn’t believe me.”

Then she added what the state calls inappropriate and what SWANK calls strategic documentation escalation:

“I’m planning an email attack of St Thomas’, St Mary’s, and Westminster and Chelsea that will set things straight.”

The email is brief. But it contains everything: the disability barrier, the disbelief, the rage — and the resolve to formalise it all through written record.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

Continued verbal disability declaration amid medical escalation
Named hospital and clinician responsible for disbelief
Refusal to endure verbal confrontation due to health limitations
Announced plan to use email as legal escalation and documentation
Precise moment where the personal shifted into formal resistance

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when institutions deny people care, they also criminalise the tone of their response.

This message is not unprofessional. It’s a logistical warning. It documents intent to escalate through formal correspondence — not violence, not aggression, but written outrage. It is what due process looks like when no other process is left.

SWANK logs it because disabled women are expected to stay calm while being blamed for the harm done to them.

IV. SWANK’s Position

This wasn’t a tantrum.
It was a redirection of force — from breathless desperation to bureaucratic warfare.

We do not accept that disbelief is a clinical opinion.
We do not accept that self-advocacy must be phrased like an apology.
We will document every email written because speaking would have killed her.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

The Doctor Who Chose Doubt Over Breath

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 23 November 2024

📍 Evil Identified. Response Prepared.

When I Say I Can’t Breathe, I Don’t Mean Emotionally.

To:

🧬 THREE SIMPLE FAILURES (THAT DESTROY BREATH AND DIGNITY):

💬 A BREATHLESS TESTIMONY:

👁 A LIFETIME OF NON-BELIEF:

🫁 WE WANT ASTHMATIC FRIENDS, NOT GASLIGHTERS:

⚠️ SOCIETY IS THE ISOLATOR. NOT US:

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT (FOR THE RECORD, AGAIN):

Three Problems, One Condition, No Compassion.

📍 To:

❌ THREE RECURRING INSTITUTIONAL FAILURES:

🫁 THE LONGEST SYMPTOM: DISBELIEF

👁 HUMANITY REQUIRES MIRRORING—NOT SURVEILLANCE

💡 OUR REQUESTS (WRITTEN, AS ALWAYS):

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT: STILL VALID. STILL IGNORED.

Belief as Treatment: Why Refusing to Trust Disabled Patients Is a Public Health Crisis

I. What Happened

II. What the Complaint Establishes

III. Why SWANK Logged It

IV. SWANK’s Position

The Email Before the Complaint Flood: How One Sentence Documented a Plan for Retaliatory Truth

I. What Happened

II. What the Complaint Establishes

III. Why SWANK Logged It

IV. SWANK’s Position

Documented Obsessions