“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label GP documentation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GP documentation. Show all posts

The Email Before the Complaint Flood: How One Sentence Documented a Plan for Retaliatory Truth


⟡ “Maybe You Could Call That Evil Doctor” ⟡
When A Disabled Mother Had to Crowdsource Accountability Because Breathing Wasn’t Enough

Filed: 23 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-06
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-23_SWANK_Email_Reid_StMarysDisbelief_DoctorEscalationWarning.pdf
Email to Dr. Philip Reid and safeguarding officials naming Dr. Arjumand at St Mary’s Hospital for disbelief during respiratory crisis and announcing formal protest escalation.

I. What Happened

On 23 November 2024, Polly Chromatic emailed social workers, legal contacts, and her GP stating that Dr. Arjumand at St Mary’s refused to believe her medical condition during an A&E visit. She did not scream. She did not threaten. She asked:

“Maybe you could call that evil doctor and ask her why she didn’t believe me.”

Then she added what the state calls inappropriate and what SWANK calls strategic documentation escalation:

“I’m planning an email attack of St Thomas’, St Mary’s, and Westminster and Chelsea that will set things straight.”

The email is brief. But it contains everything: the disability barrier, the disbelief, the rage — and the resolve to formalise it all through written record.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • Continued verbal disability declaration amid medical escalation

  • Named hospital and clinician responsible for disbelief

  • Refusal to endure verbal confrontation due to health limitations

  • Announced plan to use email as legal escalation and documentation

  • Precise moment where the personal shifted into formal resistance

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when institutions deny people care, they also criminalise the tone of their response.

This message is not unprofessional. It’s a logistical warning. It documents intent to escalate through formal correspondence — not violence, not aggression, but written outrage. It is what due process looks like when no other process is left.

SWANK logs it because disabled women are expected to stay calm while being blamed for the harm done to them.

IV. SWANK’s Position

This wasn’t a tantrum.
It was a redirection of force — from breathless desperation to bureaucratic warfare.

We do not accept that disbelief is a clinical opinion.
We do not accept that self-advocacy must be phrased like an apology.
We will document every email written because speaking would have killed her.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Breathless Is Not Unreasonable: How NHS Staff Abuse Disabled Families, Then Call Them Difficult


⟡ “I Don’t Fight Like a Wild Animal. I Email Until You Lose Your Job.” ⟡
Medical Neglect, Hospital Misconduct, and the Anatomy of Verbal Retaliation When You Can’t Breathe

Filed: 23 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-03
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-23_SWANK_Email_Reid_NHSMisconduct_ChildNeglectThreatReport.pdf
Email documenting abusive NHS conduct toward disabled parent and children, failed A&E procedures, and verbal disability assertion — with a formal threat to escalate publicly and legally.

I. What Happened

On 23 November 2024, Polly Chromatic sent a structured, blistering email to GP Philip Reid and a group of social services and legal recipients. It contained:

  • Dosage and health updates for multiple children (prednisone use)

  • Observations about neglectful NHS staff who mishandled intake tests

  • First-hand documentation of emotional and physical abuse in A&E settings

  • A written refusal to continue tolerating hospital-based maltreatment

When King’s lungs were visibly struggling, the staff told him to “breathe with his mouth closed,” and took his temperature by placing the device beside — not in — his ear.

And when Polly complained, they accused her of racism.

This was not a meltdown. It was a case file.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • Repeated NHS neglect of a disabled parent and her children

  • Mistreatment framed as clinical policy, not bias

  • Weaponised accusations (racism, non-compliance) used to deflect accountability

  • Disability dismissal: severe asthma and verbal impairment treated as irritants

  • Verbal retaliation criminalised, while institutional abuse remained protected

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because what gets called an “angry email” is often a legal archive in its purest form.

This message is strategic, evidentiary, and fully aware of the consequences. It does not plead — it indicts. Every sentence is an affidavit in disguise. Every word is a rebuttal to the fantasy that “reasonable” patients get treated fairly.

SWANK logged it because no parent should have to diagnose their own child while defending their legal right not to suffocate in silence.

IV. SWANK’s Position

This was not aggression.
It was survival, forwarded.

We do not accept that hospitals can fail four children and then ask for politeness.
We do not accept that accusations of racism erase acts of clinical cruelty.
We will document every time a parent was forced to write their own discharge summary because the state refused to care.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions