⟡ This Is Not a Leak. It’s a Verified Crime Scene. ⟡
Filed: May 2025
Reference: SWANK/HSE/ELGIN-EVIDENCE-BUNDLE
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05_SWANK_HSE_AttachmentsBundle_ElginCrescent_ToxicExposure_DisabilityEndangerment_VerifiedEvidence.pdf
I. The Gas Was Real. So Was the Silence. We Filed the Evidence.
This verified bundle of supporting attachments, submitted to the Health and Safety Executive, consolidates what others preferred to ignore:
Toxic exposure at 37 Elgin Crescent
Known risks to disabled residents — left unmitigated
Deliberate non-intervention by RBKC Environmental Health
Utility negligence from Thames Water
Landlord failure, legal breach, and silent indifference
The gas leak wasn’t hypothetical.
It was documented, ignored, and filed in multi-column exhibit index.
II. What They Refused to Investigate, We Annotated
Within this bundle:
Respiratory collapse timelines
Structural maps of unresolved hazard
Medical documentation confirming exacerbation of illness
Chronology of RBKC emails, unread or evaded
Internal contradictions between departments — now catalogued by PDF, not excuse
Their failure was cumulative.
Our evidence — symmetrical.
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because safety is not rhetorical.
Because “we’re looking into it” is not a statutory defence.
Because gas exposure in a known vulnerable household is not an oversight — it is a form of breathable cruelty.
Let the record show:
The fumes were real
The responses were performative
The negligence was cross-agency
And SWANK — bound it all for court and archive
This is not a dispute.
It is proof — formatted, footnoted, and pre-litigation ready.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not permit structural neglect to be hidden behind “ongoing investigation.”
We do not allow landlords to price human harm into their tenancies.
We do not redact silence when it causes damage.
Let the record show:
The gas came in.
The help didn’t.
The council waited.
And SWANK — filed everything they didn’t.
This isn’t repairable.
It’s indictable — and the attachments are verified.