“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Disability Disregarded. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Disability Disregarded. Show all posts

My Lungs Failed the System. So the System Failed to Acknowledge Them.



SWANK Access Denial Record

I Asked for Oxygen. They Asked for Compliance.

Filed: 1 March 2024

Labels: Disability DisregardedAsthma as DefianceForced Speech Under DistressAccess Denied by ProcessMotherhood Under Medical SiegeSystemic Retaliation for Self-Advocacy


♖ WELCOME TO SWANK ♖
An Archive of ✦ Elegance, ✦ Complaint, ✦ and Unapologetic Standards
from a Mother Harassed by the State in Two Countries for Over a Decade.


✦ What I Said

“I have asked repeatedly for accommodations due to my severe eosinophilic asthma; however, you seem to be unable to understand.”

This is not confusion.
This is a choice—
to ignore medical evidence
and call it noncompliance.

“I cannot talk due to shortness of breath… When I am forced to talk… I am unable to remain polite.”

You treat breathlessness as a behaviour.
You treat health boundaries as defiance.
You mistake oxygen deprivation for attitude.


✦ How I Am Treated

“Society continues to use social work as a weapon to attack me when I am unable to comply with their requests due to my disability.”

This is not support.
This is punishment for not performing wellness.
This is a coercive loop:
• If I stay silent—I’m withholding.
• If I speak—I’m erratic.
• If I write—you don’t read it.

“You and others misinterpret my advocacy… and call it aggressive/erratic.”

Because the system expects compliance, not communication.
Especially not written, documented, factual communication.


✦ My Physician’s Words

“The doctor explained to me… that when a human is unable to breathe, it’s very scary, and they do act erratic because of the urgency…”

This is not behavioural misconduct.
This is biology under threat.
This is a neurochemical cascade, not parenting style.

“Lack of oxygen to the brain impedes cognitive function.”

But to you, this reads as “attitude.”
You’ve replaced medical insight with moral judgement.


✦ The Simple Ask

“What accommodations have you decided to employ…?”

You were told—clearly, repeatedly—that I cannot speak.
You still demanded oral participation.
You scheduled meetings I could not attend.
You are not making accommodations.
You are enforcing barriers.


✦ Final Word

I can’t walk.
I can’t breathe.
And yet, I’m the one accused of being difficult.

You say you’re here to support families.
But what you’re doing is trying to make me collapse in public—
so you can say I was unfit.


Filed under: Procedural InaccessibilityWeaponised MeetingsPunishment for Medical HonestyForced VerbalismWhen Asthma Becomes a Referral


The Warning Came First. The Harm Came After.



⟡ “We Warned Them. They Ignored Us. Then They Retaliated.” ⟡

Polly Chromatic Sends Formal Warning About Social Worker Conduct and Health Harm — CCs Legal and Medical Contacts, Including NHS and Kirsty Hornal

Filed: 17 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-06
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-17_SWANK_EmailChain_Nannette_CC_UrgentHealth_SocialWorkerConduct_Kirsty.pdf
Summary: Early warning email from Polly Chromatic forwarding serious health and safeguarding concerns to Sarah Newman, Kirsty Hornal, and legal-medical representatives. Sent the day before the police report.


I. What Happened

On 17 February 2025, Polly Chromatic (then using legal name) emailed a letter titled “Urgent Concerns Regarding Health and Social Worker Conduct” to:

– Sarah Newman (Westminster)
– Kirsty Hornal (named recipient)
– Legal counsel: Simon O’Meara (Blackfords), Laura Savage (Merali Beedle)
– NHS contact Philip Reid
– Forwarded with full context to Nannette Nicholson for external confirmation

The email stated that a letter outlining these concerns was attached — this letter became a precursor to both:

  • Your refusal notice

  • Your police complaint against Kirsty Hornal


II. What the Record Establishes

• A formal medical-safeguarding warning was submitted to senior social work staff and lawyers
• Kirsty Hornal was made aware of medical risk and institutional danger
• NHS and legal professionals were in the chain — making the Council’s silence actionable
• This message was sent 24 hours before the police complaint
• Timeline confirms PLO retaliation followed multiple lawful warnings


III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because warnings aren’t rhetorical when lives are at risk.
Because it proves they knew — and escalated anyway.
Because the silence after this message wasn’t just cruel. It was coordinated neglect.

SWANK archives every ignored warning that turned into evidence.


IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that health warnings can be overwritten by protocol.
We do not accept that safeguarding starts after injury.
We do not accept that retaliation can masquerade as concern.

This wasn’t a help request. It was a last chance to act — and they didn’t.


This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd.

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


Documented Obsessions