Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): Chelsea & Westminster

Showing posts with label Chelsea & Westminster. Show all posts

If You Refuse to Treat Us, At Least Do It Quietly.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
I CAN’T ARGUE. I’M BREATHING. PICK ONE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Respiratory Endangerment · A&E Hostility · Medical Gaslighting · Child Treatment Refusal · Verbal Disability · NHS Bullying · SWANK Pre-Litigation Catalogue

To: Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman
Cc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Doyenne of Telepathic Correspondence

💬 THE LINES THEY STILL PRETEND NOT TO HEAR:

“No one will tell me what the ‘erratic’ behaviour was, given that I’ve only said I want treatment and can’t argue due to respiratory strain.”
“When a woman in the waiting area was abusing me, they blamed me.”
“All the hospitals share the same hatred and ignorance of asthma.”
“They refuse to treat my kids more than they refuse to treat me.”
“I’m going to sue them. It’s child neglect.”

🧠 VERBAL AUSTERITY STATEMENT:

I do not argue.
I breathe.

If you want to help—help.
If you don’t—move.
I will not waste oxygen proving my suffering to those who monetise disbelief.

🧬 ACCESS STATEMENT (STAMPED, SENT, IGNORED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Every refusal is now a receipt.
Every conversation denied is a case number pending.

📎 PRE-SUIT REMINDER:

You refused access.
You denied medical care.
You blamed me for needing it.

And now you’re logged.
Publicly. Permanently. Procedurally.

Polly Chromatic
Gaslit, blamed, untreated—and now suing.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com

Search Description:
A&E refused to treat asthmatic mother and children, then blamed them for needing care. Polly Chromatic files pre-litigation documentation.

Labels:
Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Philip Reid, NHS asthma refusal, St Thomas’, St Mary’s, Chelsea & Westminster, A&E abuse, verbal disability, child neglect, SWANK legal threat file

I Withdrew from the System Because the System Withdrew from Me

⟡ SWANK Trust Termination Notice ⟡

20 February 2024

You Don’t Get to Fail Me and Still Call It Support

I. The Line That Severs the Cord

Sent from director@swanklondon.com at 08:57 GMT, this dispatch from Polly Chromatic delivers a surgical severance to Samira Issa, and—by carbon copy—to every institution complicit in her mistreatment:

“I am not interested in your support or that of Guys’ and St Thomas’ hospital or Westminster and Chelsea hospital as you have all betrayed my trust (several times) and shown me that you are not trustworthy at all.”

There is no elaboration.
No justification.
Just precision, delivery, and closure.

II. Copied for the Record, Not for Discussion

Cc’d:

🏥 Chelsea & Westminster Complaints
🏥 CWPALS
🏥 Guys & St Thomas’ Complaints
🗂️ Eric Wedge-Bull
📁 RBKC Complaints
🧾 Glen Peache

Bcc’d:

💼 Nannette Nicholson (for legal witnessing and archival inclusion)

This was not an invitation to dialogue.
It was a notification of revocation, archived on arrival.

III. Closure Is Not Silence—It’s Precision

This is not a cry for help.
It is a disengagement notice issued with clarity.

Polly does not seek to be “heard.”
She writes to ensure she can never again be misquoted.

This is not mutual trust ending—it is a unilateral correction of false assumption.

🏷️ Court Labels:

revoked trust, medical betrayal, safeguarding collapse, Chelsea & Westminster, GSTT misconduct, RBKC overreach, SWANK closure dispatch

(Total: 178 characters) ✅

🔍 Search Description (under 150 characters):

Polly Chromatic terminates all trust in RBKC, GSTT, and C&W. No further contact invited. Institutions formally dismissed.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

Support Revoked. Trust Withdrawn.

⟡ SWANK Trust Revocation Dispatch ⟡

20 February 2024

I Am No Longer Available for Your Scripted Concern.

I. A Final Email, Carbon Copied with Precision

From: Polly Chromatic
To: Samira Issa (RBKC)
Cc: Chelsea & Westminster Complaints, PALS, GSTT Complaints, Eric Wedge-Bull, RBKC Complaints, Glen Peache

“I am not interested in your support or that of Guys’ and St Thomas’ Hospital or Westminster and Chelsea Hospital, as you have all betrayed my trust (several times) and shown me that you are not trustworthy at all.”

The list is long because the betrayals were layered.
Each recipient receives the same verdict: you are no longer welcome.

II. A Revocation of Institutional Relationship

This is not outrage.
This is withdrawal of consent and termination of false alliance.
A line is drawn—neither arbitrarily nor emotionally.

It declares:

❌ You are not qualified to “support”
❌ You have violated trust repeatedly
❌ You are not owed further explanation, presence, or performance

This isn’t avoidance.
It’s exit with receipts.

III. Filed With Elegance, Not Rage

No theatrics.
No attachments re-sent.
No revisiting the injuries—because they were already itemised and ignored.

The sentence is the summary.
The dispatch is the closure.
The trust is revoked.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

The False Record Becomes the Real Threat: NHS Misuse of Medical Data as Safeguarding Fuel

⟡ “They Called It Care. They Used It As Evidence.” ⟡
Formal Complaint to the National Data Guardian: Medical Records Were Misused to Justify Retaliation, Not Treatment

Filed: 31 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/NHS-DATA/EMAIL-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-31_SWANK_Email_NationalDataGuardian_MedicalRecordMisuseAcrossNHS.pdf
Summary: Complaint alleging systemic misuse of medical records by multiple NHS bodies and social services to justify safeguarding action, in breach of data ethics and written communication rights.

I. What Happened

On 31 May 2025, Noelle Bonnee Annee Simlett (Polly Chromatic) submitted a formal complaint to the National Data Guardian. The complaint outlines how multiple NHS bodies — including Pembridge Villas Surgery, Chelsea & Westminster, Guy’s & St Thomas’, and Westminster Children’s Services — misused or failed to correct personal medical records.

The key allegations:
– False or misleading data was used to justify coercive safeguarding
– Written-only communication adjustments were ignored
– Records were not updated despite formal correction requests
– These errors directly impacted care, safety, and dignity

II. What the Complaint Establishes

• NHS and social services violated Caldicott Principles 4, 6, and 7 — data accuracy, justified use, and duty to prevent harm
• Medical records became tools of administrative control and institutional gaslighting
• Disabling health conditions were turned into safeguarding triggers
• Correction requests were treated as non-events, giving institutions plausible deniability
• The NHS’s record-handling system functioned as a weapon, not a safeguard

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this isn’t a documentation error — it’s a structural failure that collapses trust, care, and consent.
Because written-only medical requests are not “preferences” — they are lifelines.
Because recordkeeping isn’t neutral when what gets recorded is what gets used against you.

SWANK logs the misuse of records not just as negligence — but as narrative control.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that records can be manipulated to justify coercive state involvement.
We do not accept that falsehoods can outlive formal correction.
We do not accept that any medical record system — NHS or otherwise — can ignore certified disability adjustments.

This wasn’t a data breach. This was a data weaponisation.
And SWANK will archive every document they hoped would be forgotten behind a firewall.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.