Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): asthma protocol

Showing posts with label asthma protocol. Show all posts

No Phone, No Office, No Verbal Anything—Not Now, Not Ever

⟡ SWANK Closure Dispatch, Final Addendum ⟡

9 February 2024

When Your System Requires Sound to Hear, It’s Already Broken

I. Verbal Closure, Written with Finality

A week of repeated refusals culminates in one line, issued via iPhone:

“I will not speak verbally anywhere.”
— Polly Chromatic

It is not an option.
It is a legal boundary, an access doctrine, a quiet refusal in perfect defiance.

Not in-person.
Not on the phone.
Not for you.

II. Institutional Ignorance in Four Easy Steps

What did RBKC Children’s Services ignore?

❌ No verbal phone calls
❌ No in-person meetings
❌ Documented asthma = communication disability
❌ Legal representation confirmed
❌ Referral already addressed, nothing new disclosed

Samira Issa read it all. Then asked again.
That isn’t care. That’s systemic recursion with a badge.

III. Written Sovereignty in a Spoken-World System

This isn’t defiance.
It’s functional autonomy under duress.

Written communication is participation.
Verbal coercion is exclusion.

Polly doesn’t owe another explanation.
She wrote it once. It now enters the permanent legal record.

© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
You don’t need to raise your voice when the law already speaks for you.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

No Phone. No Office. No More.

⟡ SWANK Final Boundary Dispatch: Verbal Refusal Edition ⟡

9 February 2024

Verbal Communication Is Not Required to Comply with the Law

I. The Simplest Legal Boundary in a System Addicted to Talking

Following Samira Issa’s latest pivot from phone to in-person meeting, Polly Chromatic ends the procedural spiral with seven words that require no further performance:

“I will not speak verbally anywhere.”

Not by phone.
Not in person.
Not for show.
Not for anyone’s comfort.

It is not avoidance.
It is juridical restraint with medical cause.

II. The Pattern Reiterated

Samira’s insistence echoes the systemic refrain:

“A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

Despite:

Documented asthma
A written-only communication directive
Ongoing solicitor involvement
Repeated refusals lodged in writing

This isn’t care.
It’s ableist coercion by insistence.

III. Assertive Clarity Is the New Formal Protocol

Polly’s refusal isn’t a mood.
It’s a communication doctrine.

Written is not lesser.
Refusal is not defiance.
Silence is not avoidance—it is survival.

She does not need to justify her medical reality every time a new social worker joins the thread.

She says:

“No. Not like that.”

That is the whole sentence.

© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
Silence is not avoidance—it’s survival. And clarity is the highest form of no.