“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label PLO Precursor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PLO Precursor. Show all posts

The Warning Came First. The Harm Came After.


⟡ “We Warned Them. They Ignored Us. Then They Retaliated.” ⟡

Polly Chromatic Sends Formal Warning About Social Worker Conduct and Health Harm — CCs Legal and Medical Contacts, Including NHS and Kirsty Hornal

Filed: 17 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-06
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-17_SWANK_EmailChain_Nannette_CC_UrgentHealth_SocialWorkerConduct_Kirsty.pdf
Summary: Early warning email from Polly Chromatic forwarding serious health and safeguarding concerns to Sarah Newman, Kirsty Hornal, and legal-medical representatives. Sent the day before the police report.

I. What Happened

On 17 February 2025, Polly Chromatic (then using legal name) emailed a letter titled “Urgent Concerns Regarding Health and Social Worker Conduct” to:

– Sarah Newman (Westminster)
– Kirsty Hornal (named recipient)
– Legal counsel: Simon O’Meara (Blackfords), Laura Savage (Merali Beedle)
– NHS contact Philip Reid
– Forwarded with full context to Nannette Nicholson for external confirmation

The email stated that a letter outlining these concerns was attached — this letter became a precursor to both:

  • Your refusal notice

  • Your police complaint against Kirsty Hornal

II. What the Record Establishes

• A formal medical-safeguarding warning was submitted to senior social work staff and lawyers
• Kirsty Hornal was made aware of medical risk and institutional danger
• NHS and legal professionals were in the chain — making the Council’s silence actionable
• This message was sent 24 hours before the police complaint
• Timeline confirms PLO retaliation followed multiple lawful warnings

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because warnings aren’t rhetorical when lives are at risk.
Because it proves they knew — and escalated anyway.
Because the silence after this message wasn’t just cruel. It was coordinated neglect.

SWANK archives every ignored warning that turned into evidence.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that health warnings can be overwritten by protocol.
We do not accept that safeguarding starts after injury.
We do not accept that retaliation can masquerade as concern.

This wasn’t a help request. It was a last chance to act — and they didn’t.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

They Got the Report. Then Sent the Threat.


⟡ “We Told Our Lawyers. Then We Told the Council. Then Kirsty Sent a Threat.” ⟡

Polly Chromatic Forwards Refusal Notice and Police Report to Blackfords and Merali Beedle After Sending to Westminster and RBKC

Filed: 18 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-07
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-18_SWANK_EmailChain_Blackfords_RefusalNotice_PoliceReport_Kirsty.pdf
Summary: Email chain confirming legal service of refusal notice and police complaint regarding Kirsty Hornal to solicitors and safeguarding personnel across multiple boroughs.

I. What Happened

On 18 February 2025 at 09:50 AM, Polly Chromatic forwarded the following documents:

– Her Formal Refusal to Cooperate Notice
– A police report against Kirsty Hornal

These were sent to:

  • Simon O'Meara (Blackfords)

  • Laura Savage (Merali Beedle)

  • Sarah Newman (Westminster)

  • Samira Issa, Glen Peache, Rhiannon Hodgson, and others at RBKC

  • NHS contact Philip Reid

  • Additional cc to government accounts

The forwarding email clearly references attachment of both files and provides full service trail.

II. What the Record Establishes

• The refusal notice and police complaint were formally submitted and disseminated
• Kirsty Hornal was under active police complaint before issuing any PLO letter
• Legal counsel (Blackfords, Merali Beedle) was in the loop — ensuring chain of custody
• Safeguarding leads and borough management received documentation
• Timeline confirms retaliation occurred after formal legal notification

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because retaliation isn't just unethical — it's traceable.
Because every email sent before the PLO becomes a defence against its legality.
Because legal counsel receipt makes the silence louder.

SWANK logs the moment legal and safeguarding systems were told — and did nothing.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that PLOs can be issued against police complainants.
We do not accept that silence after notice equals innocence.
We do not accept that the archive has no memory.

This wasn’t just an email. It was a legal marker — and they ignored it.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions