⟡ “This Is THE Problem” ⟡
A Multi-Generational Asthma Testimony on Medical Disbelief, Social Misfit, and the Right to Be Believed While Suffocating
Filed: 23 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-05
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-23_SWANK_Email_Reid_HospitalDisbelief_DisabilityWitnessNarrative.pdf
Email sent to medical, legal, and safeguarding authorities detailing the traumatic impact of disbelief toward a disabled mother and her asthmatic children — both socially and medically.
I. What Happened
In this message, Polly Chromatic writes plainly: there are three problems —
Defensive hospital staff
Basic failure to follow protocol
Being treated like a liar while trying to breathe
This email was sent to Dr. Philip Reid, Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Laura Savage, and others. It documents:
A direct quote from a doctor who said: “I don’t believe you” during a respiratory flare
The recurrence of disbelief across schools, hospitals, and social work settings
A refusal to have her children endure the same
The social need for peers who share their condition — not just tolerate it
It closes with a statement of grief, resolve, and perspective:
“I feel blessed that they have it. I can’t however stand to see them suffer the way I have.”
II. What the Complaint Establishes
Medical trauma from being dismissed in the middle of acute breathing distress
Chronic disbelief of both verbal and non-verbal disability symptoms
Social exclusion as a direct outcome of medical scepticism
Cultural insight into why affinity-based communities matter for marginalised health conditions
Witness-level account of procedural neglect, generational asthma, and institutional cruelty
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because this email is not about one doctor, or one A&E visit.
It is about disbelief as policy, and the violence of being told “you’re fine” while gasping for air.
It’s also a sociological diagnosis: of why children raised in systems that deny disability must form private worlds — not for retreat, but for survival.
SWANK logs it not as a grievance, but as a testimonial archive — one that collapses law, health, and anthropology into a single witness statement.
IV. SWANK’s Position
This wasn’t overreaction. It was resistance from someone who’s spent a lifetime explaining why she can’t talk — to people who never listen.
We do not accept that verbal disability must be disbelieved until collapse.
We do not accept that asthma must be proven through trauma to qualify for care.
We will document every doctor who said “I don’t believe you” — and every breath that had to answer them.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.